Abstract
The conventional DEA methodology is generally designed to evaluate the relative efficiencies of a set of comparable decision-making units (DMUs). An appropriate setting is one where all DMUs use the same inputs, produce the same outputs, experience the same operating conditions, and generally operate in similar environments. In many applications, however, it can occur that the DMUs fall into different groups or categories, where the efficiency scores for any given group may be significantly different from those of another group. Examples include sets of hospitals with different patient mixes, groups of bank branches with differing customer demographics, manufacturing plants where some have been upgraded or modernized and others not, and so on. In such settings, if one wishes to evaluate an entire set of DMUs as a single group, this necessitates modifying the DEA structure such as to make allowance for what one might deem different environmental conditions or simply inherent inequities. Such a modification is presented herein and is illustrated using a particular example involving business activities in Mexico. While we do carry out a detailed analysis of these businesses, it is important to emphasize that this paper’s principal contribution is the methodology, not the particular application to which the methodology is applied.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aparicio, J., & Santin, D. (2018). A note on measuring group performance over time with pseudo-panels. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(1), 227–235.
Banker, R., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.
Banker, R. D., & Morey, R. (1986). The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 32(12), 1613–1627.
Battase, G., Rao, D., & O'Donnell, C. (2004). A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(1), 91–103.
Byrnesa, P. E., & Storbeck, J. E. (2000). Efficiency gains from regionalization: Economic development in China revisited. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34, 141–154.
Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9, 67–88.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
Cook, W. D., Liang, L., & Zhu, J. (2010). Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective. Omega, 38, 423–430.
Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA)-thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 1–17.
Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 245–259.
Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., & Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42(3), 151–157.
Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K., Schmidt, S. S., & Yaisawarng, S. (2002). Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17(1–2), 157–174.
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografáa - INEGI. (2009). Glosario de Censos Económicos. Aguascalientes, Mexico. Retrieved from: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/glosario/default.html?p=ce09
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., & Lu, W. M. (2016). Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega, 58, 33–45.
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. Y. (2013). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41(1), 3–15.
Paradi, J., & Zhu, H. (2013). A survey on bank branch efficiency and performance research with data envelopment analysis. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 41, 61–79.
Parra Leyva, G. (2000). Economic growth in Mexico: A regional approach. (PhD.), Cornell University United States.
Seiford, L., & Zhu, J. (2003). Context-dependent data envelopment analysis-measuring attractiveness and progress. Omega, 31(5), 397–408.
Tong, L., & Liping, C. (2009). Research on the Evaluation of Innovation Efficiency for China’s Regional Innovation System by Utilizing DEA. Paper presented at the 2009 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering. http://0ieeexplore.ieee.org.millenium.itesm.mx/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5369923
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Avilés-Sacoto, S.V., Cook, W.D., Güemes-Castorena, D., Zhu, J. (2020). Evaluating Efficiency in Nonhomogeneous Environments. In: Aparicio, J., Lovell, C., Pastor, J., Zhu, J. (eds) Advances in Efficiency and Productivity II. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 287. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41618-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41618-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41617-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41618-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)