Skip to main content

Caring Democracy as a Solution Against Neoliberalism and Populism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Care Ethics, Democratic Citizenship and the State

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

Abstract

Many countries around the world are experiencing a crisis of care. It consists both in challenging welfare state spending and in international migrations from the Global South to the Global North to perform poorly paid domestic work. Care is considered as not a productive activity and as overly feminized. There is a great risk in many countries of restricting care to only a part of the population: those who are rich or powerful in neoliberal regimes, nationals in populist regimes. This chapter analyzes an alternative to these regimes that separate insiders and outsiders. A “caring democracy” (Tronto, 2013, Caring Democracy. Market, Equality, and Justice, New York University Press; 2017, International Journal of Care and Caring 1 (1): 27–43) can be understood as an inclusive society based on the idea that we are all more or less vulnerable, that all relations have to take into account collective responsibilities and to criticize hierarchy, verticality, and individualism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term “care ethics” includes not only the theoretical dimension of care but all the practices that are invested by the possibility of good care.

References

  • Barnes, Marian. 2012. Care in Everyday Life: An Ethic of Care in Practice. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, Seyla. 1986. The Generalized and the Concrete Other. In Feminism as Critique: Essays on the Politics of Gender in Late-Capitalist Societies, ed. Seyla Benhabib and Drucilla Cornell. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonelli, Laurent, and Willy Pelletier, eds. 2010. L’État démantelé. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2003. Neo-liberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy. Theory and Event 7 (1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugère, Fabienne. 2009. Pour une théorie générale du care. http://www.laviedesidees.fr/Pour-une-theorie-generale-du-care.html. Accessed 8 May 2009.

  • ———. 2019. Care Ethics. The Introduction of Care as a Political Category. Leuven: Peeters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubet, François. 2002. Le déclin de l’institution. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engster, Daniel. 2007. The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Justice, Care, and the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, Didier. 2012. Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Berenice, and Joan C. Tronto. 1990. Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring. In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, ed. Emily Abel and Margaret Nelson. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, Nancy. 2001. The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraisse, Geneviève. 1979. Femmes toutes mains. Essai sur le service domestique. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrau, Marie. 2006. La théorie politique à l’épreuve de la vulnérabilité. Intersections philosophiques. Cahiers de l’ED 139: 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol, and Naomi Snider. 2018. Why Does Patriarchy Persist? New York: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care. Personal, Political, and Global. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, Alison. 2019. The Crisis in Care. BBC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, Eva Feder, and Licia Carlson, eds. 2010. Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, Thomas. 2002. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism 14 (3): 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, Avishai. 1992. The Decent Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Jan-Werner. 2017. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Alondra. 2013. After Obamacare: The New Stakes of US Healthcare Policy. In La Clé des Langues, 25–32. Lyon: ENS de LYON/DGESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 2018. The Monarchy of Fear: A Philosopher Looks at Our Political Crisis. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghuram, Parvati. 2016. Locating Care Ethics Beyond the Global North. ACME, An International Journal for Critical Geography 15 (3): 511–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Fiona. 1999. Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory, and International Relations. Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 1998. Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality, and Politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Jason. 2018. How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. New York: Penguin Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Caring Democracy. Market, Equality, and Justice. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. There Is an Alternative: Homines Curans and the Limits of Neoliberalism. International Journal of Care and Caring 1 (1): 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrancken, Didier. 2010. Le Nouvel ordre protectionnel. Lyon: Parangon/Vs.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Anne Julie. 2001. Democracy, Justice, and the Welfare State. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris Marion. 2010 [2000]. Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, Mary K., Jacquelyn S. Litt, and Christine E. Bose. 2006. Global Dimensions of Gender and Carework. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabienne Brugère .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brugère, F. (2020). Caring Democracy as a Solution Against Neoliberalism and Populism. In: Urban, P., Ward, L. (eds) Care Ethics, Democratic Citizenship and the State. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41437-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics