Abstract
The maritime industry has been working to apply unique solutions capable of improving design and development performance to ensure competitiveness [ 1–4]. Over the past several decades, the industry has faced changes related to the increasing complexity of the dynamic global market. Activities to meet these challenges have been carried out in the marine space (e.g. aquaculture, renewable energy, environmental monitoring, accident response and clean up), however, design methodologies have remained rather unchanged, regardless of demand for the incorporation of new technologies and materials. Literature and multiple case studies have been utilized to present a design methodology and its preliminary results, which aim to help transform the design process for the extension of serviceability and reduction of design time. This paper describes an innovative maritime design framework, based on the comprehensive usage of design methodologies and advanced technology integration in vessel design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Koenig PC, Narita H, Baba K (2002) Lean production in the Japanese shipbuilding industry? J Ship Prod 18(3):167–174
Milanovic V (2016) Application of set-based concurrent engineering to shipbuilding projects. MS Engineering and ICT. Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Liker J, Lamb T (2001) Lean Shipbuilding. In: Ship Production Symposium, Ypsilanti, MI
Radovic I, Macclaren BJ (2004) Lean six sigma in shipbuilding. In: European shipbuilding and repair conference, London, 2 November 2004
Corbett JJ, Winebrake J (2008) The impacts of globalisation on international maritime transport activity. In: Global forum on transport and environment in a globalising world
Markit IHS (2016) Five trends shaping the global maritime industry
Thanopoulou H, Strandenes SP (2017) A theoretical framework for analysing long-term uncertainty in shipping. Case Stud Transp Policy 5(2)
Luglietti R, Wurst S, Sassanelli C, Terzi S, Martín CM (2018) Towards the definition of specialized vessels’ model. In: 2018 IEEE international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC)
Womack JP, Jones DT (1996) Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon & Schuster, New York
Whalen M (2014) Low cost, big return. JPL - Universe, Pasadena
León HCM, Farris JA (2011) Lean product development research: current state and future directions. EMJ Eng Manag J 23(1):29–51
Welo T (2011) On the application of lean principles in product development: a commentary on models and practices. Int J Prod Dev 13(4):316
Rossi M et al (2011) Proposal of a method to systematically identify wastes in new product development process. In: 2011 17th international conference on concurrent enterprising, (Ice), pp 1–9
Oehmen J, Rebentisch E (2010) Waste in lean product development. Lean.Mit.Edu 19(1): 471–473
Morgan JM, Liker JK (2006) The Toyota product development system: integrating people, process and technology, vol 24
Krishnan V, Ulrich KT (2001) Product development decisions: a review of the literature. Manage Sci. 47(1):1–21
Browning TR (2003) On customer value and improvement in product development processes. Syst Eng 6(1):49–61
Rebentisch E, Rhodes DH, Murman E (2004) Lean systems engineering: research initiatives in support of a new paradigm. Syst Eng 4(1)
Chase JP (2001) Value creation in the product development process. M.Sc. thesis, pp 1–133
Oppenheim BW (2011) Lean enablers for system engineering. Syst Eng 14(3):305–326
Liker JK, Morgan J (2011) Lean product development as a system: a case study of body and stamping development at ford. EMJ Eng Manag J 23(1):16–28
Rossi M, Morgan J, Shook J (2017) Lean product and process development. In: The Routledge companion to lean management
Garcia P, Drogosz J (2007) Lean engineering—best practice in the automotive industry. SAE Tech Pap
Khan M et al (2013) Towards lean product and process development. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 26(12):1105–1116
Kerga E, Taisch M, Terzi S, Bessega W, Rosso A (2014) Set-based concurrent engineering innovation roadmap (SBCE IR): a case on adiabatic humidification system. Int J Des Creativity Innovation 2(4):224–255
Mascitelli R (2004) The lean design guidebook: everything your product development team needs to slash manufacturing cost
Oppenheim BW (2004) Lean product development flow. Syst Eng 7(4):352–376
Browning TR et al (2002) Adding value in product development by creating information and reducing risk. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 49(4):443–458
Longva KK (2009) Warehouse management in a lean shipbuilding perspective—an exploratory case study of Ulstein Verft. Høgskolen Molde
Salem O, Solomon J, Genaidy A, Minkarah I (2006) Lean construction: from theory to implementation. J Manag Eng 22(4)
Hamann R, Peschmann J (2013) Goal-based standards and risk-based design. Sh Technol Res 60(2):46–56
Molland AF (2008) The maritime engineering reference book, 1st edn. Butterworth-Heinemann
Papanikolaou A (2009) Risk-based ship design: methods, tools and applications. Springer
Liker JK, Lamb T (2002) What is lean ship construction and repair. J Sh Prod 18(3):121–142
Phogat S (2013) An introduction to applicability of lean shipbuilding. Int J Latest Res Sci Technol 2(6):85–89
Dugnas K, Oterhals O (2008) State-of-the-art shipbuilding: towards unique and integrated lean production systems. In: Proceedings of IGLC16: 16th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, 6411, pp 321–331
Nunamaker J, Chen M, Purdin T (1991) Systems development in Information systems research. J Manag Inf Syst 7:89–106
DG for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (2009) The role of maritime clusters and development executive summary ECO
Rossi M, Terzi S (2017) CLIMB: maturity assessment model for design and engineering processes. Int J Prod Lifecycle Manag 10(1)
Rossi M, Terzi S, Taisch M (2014) Engineering and design best practices in new product development: an empirical research. Procedia CIRP 21:2.
Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1)
Shook J (2018) The lean transformation framework. The Lean Enterprise Institute. https://www.lean.org/WhatsLean/TransformationFramework.cfm
Sullivan BP, Rossi M, Terzi S (2018) A customizable lean design methodology for maritime. In: 5th IFIP WG 5.1 international conference, Turin, Italy. https://doi.org/0.1007/978-3-030-01614-2_47
Rossi M, Taisch M, Terzi S (2012) Lean product development: a five-steps methodology for continuous improvement. In: 2012 18th international conference on engineering, technology and innovation, ICE 2012—conference proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2012.6297704
Acknowledgements
The content of this paper is based on the LINCOLN project (EU H2020 727982) that is currently under development (www.lincolnproject.eu). We wish to express our deep gratitude to all LINCOLN partners.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sullivan, B.P., Rossi, M., Ramundo, L., Terzi, S. (2020). Maritime Design Process Improvement Through a Lean Transformation. In: Rossi, M., Rossini, M., Terzi, S. (eds) Proceedings of the 6th European Lean Educator Conference. ELEC 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 122. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41429-0_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41429-0_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41428-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41429-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)