Skip to main content

Electronic Data Capture Systems for Breast Cancer Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Breast MRI for High-risk Screening

Abstract

Traditionally, clinical studies relied on collecting data by hands in paper case report forms (CRFs), which were later entered into an electronic database for statistical analysis. Clearly, this method was time-consuming, prone to misinterpretation, and basically inefficient. These limitations can be currently avoided using electronic data capture (EDC) systems, powerful tools reducing study times and costs and, importantly, enhancing the quality of collected data. Generally, EDC systems use a web-based platform, accessible from any computer or mobile device connected to the Internet. Investigators of a multicenter clinical trial can access the system at any time and at any location, with only the possibility to enter patient data of their own center, being blinded to the other institutions’ data. The administrator has total access to all subjects enrolled by all centers, exclusive rights to extract patient data, and the ability to modify the content of any CRF at any time. EDC systems are still poorly used in breast imaging research and imaging research in general, as handling of images is still insufficiently supported. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the current information technology systems to gather data in the framework of a multicenter clinical trial. A working example is discussed in the specific setting of the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for breast cancer screening of high-risk women. In addition, the experience of a large international study on preoperative breast MRI is reported. Radiologists and imaging specialists, especially when carrying out spontaneous and/or low-budget research, should be aware of the possibilities offered by these systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ACS:

American Cancer Society

CDISC:

Clinical data interchange standards consortium

CONSORT:

Consolidated standards of reporting trials

CRF:

Case report form

DICOM:

Digital imaging and communication in medicine

EDC:

Electronic data capture

FTPS:

File transfer protocol secure

GUI:

Graphical user interface

HIBCRIT:

High breast cancer risk Italian (study)

MIPA:

Preoperative breast MRI in clinical practice: multicenter international prospective analysis

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PACS:

Picture archiving and communication system

PDF:

Portable document format

References

  1. Sardanelli F, Di Leo G (2009) Biostatistics for radiologists. Springer, Milan, pp 150–153

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) (1996) Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R1). https://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6/E6_R1_Guideline.pdf. Accessed 30 Jun 2020

  3. Hemminki A, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL (2006) Harmful impact of EU clinical trials directive. BMJ 332:501–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grimes DA, Hubacher D, Nanda K et al (2005) The good clinical practice guideline: a bronze standard for clinical research. Lancet 366:172–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pocock SJ (2006) The simplest statistical test: how to check for a difference between treatments. BMJ 332:1256–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357:1191–1194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) (2016) Integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2). http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6/E6_R2_Step_4_2016_1109.pdf. Accessed 30 Jun 2020

  8. Sardanelli F, Podo F, Santoro F et al (2011) Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk Italian 1 study): final results. Invest Radiol 46:94–105

    Google Scholar 

  9. European Parliament (2002) Directive 2002/58/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32002L0058:EN:pdf. Accessed 30 Jun 2020

  10. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration (2007) Guidance for industry—computerized systems used in clinical investigations. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm070266.pdf. Accessed 30 Jun 2020

  11. Shah J, Rajgor D, Pradhan S, McCready M, Zaveri A, Pietrobon R (2010) Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: open source versus commercial systems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2664–2671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Staziaki PV, Kim P, Vadvala HV, Ghoshhajra BB (2016) Medical registry data collection efficiency: a crossover study comparing web-based electronic data capture and a standard spreadsheet. J Med Internet Res 18:e141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Walther B, Hossin S, Townend J, Abernethy N, Parker D, Jeffries D (2011) Comparison of electronic data capture (EDC) with the standard data capture method for clinical trial data. PLoS One 6:e25348

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dillon DG, Pirie F, Rice S et al (2014) Open-source electronic data capture system offered increased accuracy and cost-effectiveness compared with paper methods in Africa. J Clin Epidemiol 67:1358–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller CG, Krasnow J, Schwartz LH (2014) Medical imaging in clinical trials. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Gentili A, Chung CB, Hughes T (2007) Use of the MIRC DICOM service for clinical trials to automatically create teaching file cases from PACS. Radiographics 27:269–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao Y, Burns SS, Lauzon CB et al (2013) Integration of XNAT/PACS, DICOM, and research software for automated multi-modal image analysis. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 8674: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2007621

  18. van Herk M (2014) Integration of a clinical trial database with a PACS. JPCS 489:12099

    Google Scholar 

  19. Skripcak T (2014) Lessons learned from integrating OpenClinica with other IT systems. https://community.openclinica.com/sites/fileuploads/akaza/cms-community/Tomas%20Skripcak%20-%20Lessons%20learned.pdf. Accessed 30 Jun 2020

  20. Haak D, Page CE, Reinartz S, Krüger T, Deserno TM (2015) DICOM for clinical research: PACS-integrated electronic data capture in multi-center trials. J Digit Imaging 28:558–566

    Google Scholar 

  21. Date CJ (2012) Database design and relational theory: normal forms and all that jazz, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol

    Google Scholar 

  22. de Haan L, Koppelaars T (2007) Applied mathematics for database professionals, 1st edn. Apress Media LLC, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. VanderClute S (2003) How the information highway can help manage medical equipment. Biomed Instrum Technol Suppl:7–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cadick R (2004–2005) Implementing Citrix: weighing the pros and cons. Biomed Instrum Technol Suppl:23–24

    Google Scholar 

  25. Afrin LB, Kuppuswamy V, Slater B, Stuart RK (1997) Electronic clinical trial protocol distribution via the World-Wide Web: a prototype for reducing costs and errors, improving accrual, and saving trees. J Am Med Inform Assoc 4:25–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fegan GW, Lang TA (2008) Could an open-source clinical trial data-management system be what we have all been looking for? PLoS Med 5:e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ngari MM, Waithira N, Chilengi R, Njuguna P, Lang T, Fegan G (2014) Experience of using an open source clinical trials data management software system in Kenya. BMC Res Notes 7:845

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

AcknowledgementsAuthors thank Dr. Paolo Roazzi (National Center for Health Technology Assessment, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy) and Dr. Mariano Santaquilani (Informatics Service, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy) for having designed and developed the EDC system used in the HIBCRIT-2 study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Di Leo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Di Leo, G., Sacchetto, D., Santoro, F. (2020). Electronic Data Capture Systems for Breast Cancer Research. In: Sardanelli, F., Podo, F. (eds) Breast MRI for High-risk Screening. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41207-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41207-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41206-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41207-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics