Skip to main content

Effects of In- and Out-of-Plane Nonlinear Modelling of Masonry Infills on the Seismic Response of R.C. Framed Buildings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of XXIV AIMETA Conference 2019 (AIMETA 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

The present work is aimed at identifying the effects of in-plane (IP) and out-of-plane (OOP) damage of unreinforced masonry infills (MIs) on the nonlinear seismic response of r.c. framed buildings. To this end, the state secondary school De Gasperi-Battaglia in Norcia (Italy) is considered for the numerical investigation. The school is a reinforced concrete framed structure with a long-shaped rectangular plan, due to the ex-post structural linking of three adjacent blocks originally separated by Gerber saddles, and regular elevation. Composed of a basement and three storeys above the ground level, the structure was built in the early 1960s in compliance with the 1939 Royal Decree Law. The infill typologies consist of: (i) two leaves of hollow clay bricks, for the interior frames; (ii) one leaf with solid bricks and the other leaf similar to the previous MI, for the exterior frames. Partial height infill walls inducing short column effects are placed along the long side of the perimeter, where the low height is attributed to window openings. First a five-element macro-model comprising four diagonal nonlinear beams and one (horizontal) central nonlinear truss for the prediction of the OOP and IP behaviour of MIs, respectively, is implemented in a C++ computer code for the nonlinear dynamic analysis of r.c. infilled framed structures. The proposed algorithm addresses the issue of nonlinear interaction by modifying stiffness and strength values of the MI in the OOP direction on the basis of simultaneous or prior IP damage. Three-dimensional models of the test structure are subjected to biaxial spectrum-compatible accelerograms, assuming: (i) bare structure with non-structural MIs; (ii) infilled structure with structural MIs. Moreover, three assumptions are made for the behaviour of MIs: i.e. elastic both IP and OOP; inelastic IP and elastic OOP; inelastic both IP and OOP. The numerical results confirm the validity of the five-element macro-model in simulating IP and OOP failure mechanisms of MIs in De Gasperi-Battaglia school, and highlight the importance of including nonlinear OOP behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dolce, M., Goretti, A.: Building damage assessment after the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 13(8), 2241–2264 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Braga, F., Manfredi, V., Masi, A., Salvatori, A., Vona, M.: Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L’Aquila, 2009 earthquake. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 9(1), 307–324 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Di Domenico, M., Ricci, P., Verderame, G.M.: Experimental assessment of the out-of-plane strength of URM infill walls with different slenderness and boundary conditions. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17, 3959–3993 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00604-5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hak, S., Morandi, P., Magenes, G., Sullivan, T.J.: Damage control for clay masonry infills in the design of RC frame structures. J. Earthquake Eng. 12(S1), 1–35 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mohammad Noh, N., Liberatore, L., Mollaioli, F., Tesfamariam, S.: Modelling of masonry infilled RC frames subjected to cyclic loads: state of the art review and modelling with OpenSees. Eng. Struct. 150, 599–621 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ricci, P., Di Domenico, M., Verderame, G.M.: Empirical-based out-of-plane URM infill wall model accounting for the interaction with in-plane demand. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47(3), 802–827 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Di Trapani, F., Shing, P.B., Cavaleri, L.: Macroelement model for in-plane and out-of-plane responses of masonry infills in frame structures. J. Struct. Eng. 144(2), 04017198 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mazza, F.: In-plane–out-of-plane non-linear model of masonry infills in the seismic analysis of R.C.‐framed buildings. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 48(4), 432–453 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Di Trapani, F., Macaluso, G., Cavaleri, L., Papia, M.: Masonry infills and RC frames interaction: literature overview and state of the art of macromodeling approach. Eur. J. Environ. Civil Eng. 19(9), 1059–1095 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Asteris, P.G., Cavaleri, L., Di Trapani, F., Tsaris, A.K.: Numerical modelling of out-of-plane response of infilled frames: state of the art and future challenges for the equivalent strut macromodels. Eng. Struct. 132, 110–122 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ricci, P., Di Domenico, M., Verderame, G.M.: Experimental assessment of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction in unreinforced masonry infill walls. Eng. Struct. 173, 960–978 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Basha, S.H., Kaushik, H.B.: A novel macromodel for prediction of shear failure in columns of masonry infilled RC frames under earthquake loading. Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17, 2219–2244 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-00537-5

    Google Scholar 

  13. Royal Decree-Law No. 2229 Regulations for the construction of not reinforced and reinforced buildings (1939). (In Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Updating of the Technical Regulations for the Constructions. Italian Ministry of the Infrastructures, D.M., 17 Jan 2018. (In Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mainstone, R.J.: Supplementary note on the stiffness and strength of infilled frames. Current Paper CP 13/74, Building Research Station, U.K. (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Papia, M., Cavaleri, L., Fossetti, M.: Infilled frames: developments in the evaluation of the stiffening effect of infills. Struct. Eng. Mech. 16, 675–693 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dawe, J.L., Seah, C.K.: Out-of-plane resistance of concrete masonry infilled panels. Can. J. Civil Eng. 16(6), 854–864 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bertoldi, S.H., Decanini, L.D., Gavarini, C.: Telai tamponati soggetti ad azione sismica, un modello semplificato: confronto sperimentale e numerico. In: Proceedings of the VI National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, ANIDIS, Perugia, Italy (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mazza, F., Mazza, M.: Nonlinear modeling and analysis of R.C. framed buildings located in a near-fault area. Open Const. Build. Technol. J. 6, 346–354 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ESD: European Strong Motion database. http://esm.mi.ingv.it/

  21. N.T.C. 2018: Updating of the Technical Regulations for the Constructions. Italian Ministry of the Infrastructures, D.M., 17 Jan 2018

    Google Scholar 

  22. Acunzo, G., Pagliaroli, A., Scasserra, G.: In-Spector: un software di supporto alla selezione di accelerogrammi naturali spettrocompatibili per analisi geotecniche e strutturali. In: 33° Convegno Nazionale GNGTS, Bologna, Italy, vol. 2, pp. 107–114 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mazza, F., Labernarda, R.: Structural and non-structural intensity measures for the assessment of base-isolated structures subjected to pulse-like near-fault earthquakes. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 96, 115–127 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. C.E.N., European Committee for Standardization (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present work was financed by Re.L.U.I.S. (Italian network of university laboratories of earthquake engineering), in accordance with the “Convenzione D.P.C.-Re.L.U.I.S. 2019–2021, WP15, Code Revisions for Isolation and Dissipation”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Mazza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mazza, F., Donnici, A. (2020). Effects of In- and Out-of-Plane Nonlinear Modelling of Masonry Infills on the Seismic Response of R.C. Framed Buildings. In: Carcaterra, A., Paolone, A., Graziani, G. (eds) Proceedings of XXIV AIMETA Conference 2019. AIMETA 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41057-5_148

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41057-5_148

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41056-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41057-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics