Skip to main content

Dynamic Identification and Damage Detection on Masonry Buildings Using Shaking Table Tests

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of XXIV AIMETA Conference 2019 (AIMETA 2019)

Abstract

In the year 2016 Central Italy has been struck by a series of massive earthquakes of significant intensity, highlighting the need to improve the knowledge on the dynamic behavior of masonry structures excited by ground motions in order to develop useful design solutions to mitigate the seismic vulnerability. For this reason, a research program aimed to improve the dynamic performance of masonry structures by using confined masonry technique was started. A shaking table experimental investigation has been carried out on both unreinforced and confined masonry building models at the ENEA laboratory in Casaccia, Rome, in order to compare the dynamic behavior of the two different construction types.

The masonry models modal parameters characterization has been obtained from full-scale Ambient Vibration Tests (AVTs) outside and inside the shaking table through classical contact sensors. It is well known that the dynamic identification of a model fixed on a shaking table is a crucial task, due to the interaction between the complex dynamic actuators system and the model itself producing similar effects to the well known soil–structure interaction problem. For this reason the experimental modal parameters of the two masonry models outside the table have been compared to those obtained when the structural model were bound to the table and subjected to random loads having almost white noise characteristics.

The dynamic investigation was then extended to gather information on the possible influence of the damage patterns observed in the two models on changes in the modal parameters (both natural frequencies and mode shapes). To this purpose, a reference seismic input motion characterized by significant intensity in all the three directions has been used as input and a series of seismic tests have been carried out increasing the amplitudes of the chosen reference acceleration records. At the end of each seismic test, a dynamic characterization test has been carried out applying a white noise random excitation.

The obtained results can be crucial for both calibrating reliable numerical models to be used for static and dynamic non linear analysis and for assessing the ability of the modal parameters to be used as damage detection and localization indexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cavalagli, N., Gusella, V.: Dome of the Basilica of Santa Maria Degli Angeli in Assisi: static and dynamic assessment. Int. J. Architectural Herit. 9(2), 157–175 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Candeias, P.X., Campos Costa, A., Mendes, N., Costa, A.A., Lourenço, P.B.: Experimental assessment of the out-of-plane performance of masonry buildings through shaking table tests. Int. J. Architectural Herit. 11(1), 31–58 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chácara, C., Cannizzaro, F., Pantò, B., Caliò, I., Lourenço, P.B.: Assessment of the dynamic response of unreinforced masonry structures using a macroelement modeling approach. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 47(12), 2426–2446 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Valente, M., Milani, G.: Seismic response and damage patterns of masonry churches: seven case studies in Ferrara, Italy. Eng. Struct. 177, 809–835 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Severini, L., Cavalagli, N., Gusella, V.: Dynamic response of masonry arch with geometrical irregularities subjected to a pulse-type ground motion. Nonlinear Dyn. 91(1), 609–624 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferrante, A., Clementi, F., Milani, G.: Dynamic behavior of an inclined existing masonry tower in Italy. Front. Built Environ. 5, 16 (2019). Art. No. 33

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pepi, C., Cavalagli, N., Ciano, M., Gioffré, M., Gusella, V.: Performance comparison between unreinforced and confined masonry buildings subjected to shaking table tests. In: Proceedings of the 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete, Greece (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Medeiros, P., Vasconcelos, G., Lourenço, P.B., Gouveia, J.: Numerical modelling of non-confined and confined masonry walls. Constr. Build. Mater. 41, 968–976 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klingner, R.: Behavior of masonry in the Northridge (US) and Tecomań–Colima (Mexico) earthquakes: lessons learned, and changes in US design provisions. Constr. Build. Mater. 20, 204–209 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshimura, K., Kurokii, M.: Damage to masonry buildings caused by the El Salvador Earthquake of January 13, 2001. J. Nat. Disaster Sci. 23(2), 53–63 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Su, R.K.L., Lee, Y.Y., Lee, C.L., Ho, J.C.M.: Typical collapse modes of confined masonry buildings under strong earthquake loads. Open Constr. Build. Technol. J. 5(Suppl 1–M2), 50–60 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karantoni, F., Pantazopoulou, S., Ganas, A.: Confined masonry as practical seismic construction alternative-the experience from the 2014 Cephalonia Earthquake. Front. Struct. Civil Eng. 12(3), 270–290 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tomazevic, M., Klemenc, I.: Seismic behaviour of confined masonry walls. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 26, 1059–1071 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tripathy, D., Singhal, V.: Estimation of in-plane shear capacity of confined masonry walls with and without openings using strut-and-tie analysis. Eng. Struct. 188, 290–304 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pepi, C., Gioffré, M., Comanducci, G., Cavalagli, N., Bonaca, A., Ubertini, F.: Dynamic characterization of a severely damaged historic masonry bridge. Procedia Eng. 199, 3398–3403 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pellegrini, D., Girardi, M., Lourenço, P.B., Masciotta, M.G., Mendes, N., Padovani, C., Ramos, L.F.: Modal analysis of historical masonry structures: linear perturbation and software benchmarking. Constr. Build. Mater. 189, 1232–1250 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gioffré, M., Gusella, V., Cluni, F.: Performance evaluation of monumental bridges: testing and monitoring “Ponte delle Torri” in Spoleto. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 4(2), 95–106 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marwala, F.U.: Using Computional Intelligence Techniques. Springer, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cabboi, A., Gentile, C., Saisi, A.: From continuous vibration monitoring to FEM-based damage assessment: application on a stone-masonry tower. Constr. Build. Mater. 156, 252–265 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pepi, C., Gioffré, M., Grigoriu, M.D., Matthies, H.G.: Bayesian updating of cable stayed footbridge model parameters using dynamic measurements. In: Proceedings of the 7th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Crete, Greece (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pepi, C., Gioffré, M., Grigoriu, M.D.: Parameters identification of cable stayed footbridges using Bayesian inference. Meccanica 54, 1403–1419 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brincker, R., Ventura, C., Andersen, P.: Damping estimation by frequency domain decomposition. Proc. Int. Modal Anal. Conf. - IMAC 01, 964–979 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ewins, D.: Modal Testing: Theory and Practice. Mechanical Engineering Research Studies: Engineering Dynamics Series. Research Studies Press, Hertfordshire (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Trombetti, T., Conte, J.: Shaking table dynamics: results from a test-analysis comparison study. J. Earthq. Eng. 10(6), 513–551 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pitilakis, D., Iliou, K., Karatzetzou, A.: Shaking table tests on a stone masonry building: modeling and identification of dynamic properties including soil-foundation-structure interaction. Int. J. Architectural Herit. 12(6), 1019–1037 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gentile, C., Guidobaldi, M., Saisi, A.: One-year dynamic monitoring of a historic tower: damage detection under changing environment. Meccanica 51, 2873–2889 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Masciotta, M.G., Ramos, L.F., Lourenço, P.B., Vasta, M.: Damage identification and seismic vulnerability assessment of a historic masonry chimney. Ann. Geophys. 60(4), S0442 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gioffré, M., Cavalagli, N., Pepi, C., Trequattrini, M.: Laser doppler and radar interferometer for contactless measurements on unaccessible tie-rods on monumental buildings: Santa Maria della Consolazione Temple in Todi. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 778 (2017). Art. 012008

    Google Scholar 

  29. Roselli, I., Malena, M., Mongelli, M., Cavalagli, N., Gioffré, M., De Canio, G., de Felice, G.: Health assessment and ambient vibration testing of the “Ponte delle Torri” of Spoleto during the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence. J. Civil Struct. Health Monitoring 8(2), 199–2016 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Meoni, A., D’Alessandro, A., Cavalagli, N., Gioffré, M., Ubertini, F.: Shaking table tests on a masonry building monitored using smart bricks: damage detection and localization. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 48(8), 910–928 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mongelli, M., Roselli, I., De Canio, G., Ambrosino, F.: Quasi real-time FEM calibration by 3D displacement measurements of large shaking table tests using HPC resources. Adv. Eng. Softw. 120, 14–25 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Roselli, I., De Canio, G., Rossi, M., Calderini, C., Lagomarsino, S.: Relative displacements of 3D optical markers for deformations and crack monitoring of a masonry structure under shaking table tests. Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas. 7(4), 350–362 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Allemang, R.J.: The Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC): twenty years of use and abuse. J. Sound Vibr. 37(8), 14–21 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The Authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the “Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Perugia” that funded this study through the project “Casa Sicura: tecniche antisismiche innovative nella tradizione delle costruzioni” (Project Code 2017.0233.021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Pepi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pepi, C., Cavalagli, N., Gioffré, M., Gusella, V. (2020). Dynamic Identification and Damage Detection on Masonry Buildings Using Shaking Table Tests. In: Carcaterra, A., Paolone, A., Graziani, G. (eds) Proceedings of XXIV AIMETA Conference 2019. AIMETA 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41057-5_147

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41057-5_147

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41056-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41057-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics