Skip to main content

Diverting Linguistic Diversity: The Politics of Multilingualism in the European Parliament

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multilingualism and Politics

Abstract

The European Union (EU) motto ‘united in diversity’ encompasses a rich variety of languages. Both the treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights commit the Union to respecting linguistic diversity. Yet, what such linguistic diversity concretely entails remains unclear. This chapter draws on original fieldwork (debates on resolutions, European Parliament activities and interactions with Members of the European Parliament), including over 150 interviews conducted as part of a larger project on the contestation of minority rights in the EU. It shows that everyone appears to be a champion of linguistic diversity inside the European Parliament. But whereas minority rights activists use this value to motivate Brussels to act where their national governments would not, their opponents instead interpret in a way that helps them maintain the domestic status quo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A possible Brexit would not affect the number of official languages.

  2. 2.

    The analysis covers oral and written statements, including explanations of votes.

  3. 3.

    According to Nanz (2006, p. 4), a European public sphere consists of “a multiplicity of continuous and overlapping civic dialogues conducted across cultural and national boundaries that lead to the mutual formation and change of individual perspectives.”

  4. 4.

    Consider, for example: “There can be no European democracy because there is no European public sphere; there can be no European public sphere because there is no European people […]; and there can be no European people because there is no common European language” (Kraus 2000, pp. 14–15).

  5. 5.

    Recognition varies both across and within states. Within the United Kingdom, for instance, Irish, Scottish Gaelic and Welsh receive more official support than Cornish, Channel Island French and Scots (Hornsby and Agarin 2012, p. 100). Basque is a regional language in France and Spain, but the rights of its speakers are different across the two countries (see Trenz 2007). See Liu (2017) for an account of how group size affects the recognition of minority languages.

  6. 6.

    The European Language Equality Network replaced EBLUL in 2011.

  7. 7.

    Interview, Davyth Hicks.

  8. 8.

    Interview, Davyth Hicks.

  9. 9.

    The European Commission’s (2005, p. 3) multilingualism policy aimed to promote “a climate that is conducive to the full expression of languages, in which the teaching and learning of a variety of languages can flourish.”

  10. 10.

    It only mentioned that “standards of teaching and development in respect of other languages not assessed by the indicator” should not be undermined (European Parliament 2006c).

  11. 11.

    Other examples, of course, exist (e.g. Blok 2008; Groß 2015; Welsh 2013).

  12. 12.

    “[It] stresses that the European Union has to be an area where respect for ethnic, cultural and linguistic diversity prevails, and where people are neither excluded nor marginalized in any way; points out that the EU needs to adopt a systematic approach to the preservation and protection of minority languages and cultures” (European Parliament Intergroup for Traditional Minorities, National Communities and Languages 2014).

  13. 13.

    See Krausneker (2000).

References

  • Ammon, U. (2006). Language conflicts in the European Union. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 319–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2017). Minority SafePack Initiative: You Are Not Alone. One Million Signatures for Diversity in Europe. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/citizens-initiative/public/documents/1721.

  • Arzoz, X. (2008). Introduction: Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union. In X. Arzoz (Ed.), Respecting Linguistic Diversity in the European Union (pp. 1–13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • AThEME. (2016). Understanding What It Means to Speak More Than One Language. Retrieved from https://www.atheme.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Flyer_AThEME_def.pdf.

  • Birdsall, A. (2016). But We Don’t Call It ‘Torture’! Norm Contestation During the US ‘War on Terror.’. International Politics, 53(2), 176–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, A. (2008). Contesting Global Norms: Politics of Identity in Japanese Pro-Whaling Countermobilization. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheneval, F., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2013). The Case for Demoicracy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 334–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cianetti, L., & Nakai, R. (2017). Critical Trust in European Institutions: The Case of the Russian-Speaking Minorities in Estonia and Latvia. Problems of Post-Communism, 64(5), 276–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Climent-Ferrando, V. (2016). Linguistic Neoliberalism in the European Union: Politics and Policies of the EU’s Approach to Multilingualism. Revista de Llengua i Dret, 66, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2005). Council Conclusion of 13 June 2005 on the Official Use of Additional Languages within the Council and Possibly Other Institutions and Bodies of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, C(148), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csergő, Z., & Goldgeier, J. M. (2009, November 17). Virtual Nationalism. Retrieved August 18, 2017, from https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/11/17/virtual-nationalism/.

  • Deitelhoff, N., & Zimmermann, L. (2013). Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Validity of International Norms. PRIF Working Paper No. 18, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • DLDP. (2015). The Digital Language Diversity Project. Retrieved from http://www.dldp.eu/en/content/project.

  • Doerr, N. (2012). Translating Democracy: How Activists in the European Social Forum Practice Multilingual Deliberation. European Political Science Review, 4(3), 361–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • EurActiv. (2009, March 25). Parliament Split Over Language Teaching. Retrieved from http://www.euractiv.com/section/languages-culture/news/parliament-split-over-language-teaching/.

  • European Commission. (2005). A New Framework Strategy for Multilingualism. COM (2005) 596 Final: Brussels, 22 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2008). Multilingualism: An Asset for Europe and a Shared Commitment. COM (2008) 566 Final: Brussels, 18 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). State of the Union Address 2013. SPEECH/13/684: Strasbourg, 11 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2014). Linguistic Diversity: The Heart of Europe’s DNA. SPEECH/14/492: Brussels, 24 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Communities. (2004). Promoting Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity: An Action Plan 2004–06. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council. (2002). Presidency Conclusions. SN 100/1/02 REV 1: Barcelona, 15–16 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Court of Justice. (1999, February 23). European Parliament v Council of the European Union, No. C-42/97.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (1981). Resolution on a Community Charter of Regional Languages and Cultures and on a Charter of Rights of Ethnic Minorities. Official Journal of the European Communities, C(287), 106–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2006a). A New Framework Strategy for Multilingualism (Debate). A6-0372/2006: Strasbourg, 14 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2006b). Framework Strategy for Multilingualism. P6_TA(2006)0488: Strasbourg, 15 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2006c). Promoting Multilingualism and Language Learning in the EU. P6_TA(2006)0184: Brussels, 27 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2006d). Promoting Multilingualism and Language Learning in the EU (Debate). A6-0074/2006: Brussels, 26 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2009a). Explanations of Vote: Report: Vasco Graça Moura (A6-0092/2009). A6-0092/2009: Strasbourg, 24 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2009b). Multilingualism: An Asset for Europe and a Shared Commitment. P6_TA(2009)0162: Strasbourg, 24 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2009c). Multilingualism: An Asset for Europe and a Shared Commitment. A6-0092/2009: Brussels, 24 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2009d). Multilingualism: An Asset for Europe and a Shared Commitment (Short Presentation). A6-0092/2009: Strasbourg, 23 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2013a). Endangered European Languages and Linguistic Diversity. P7_TA(2013)0350: Strasbourg, 11 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2013b). Explanations of Votes: Endangered European Languages and Linguistic Diversity. A7-0239/2013: Strasbourg, 11 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament Intergroup for Traditional Minorities, National Communities and Languages. (2014, April 17). The Strasbourg Manifesto on the Protection of National Minorities and Languages within the Framework of the European Union. Retrieved from http://www.e-f-a.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Studies_on_EFA_and_other_texts/Strasbourg_Manifesto_Intergroup.pdf.

  • Faingold, E. D. (2015). Language Rights in the European Union and the Treaty of Lisbon. Language Problems and Language Planning, 39(1), 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, D. (1995). Does Europe Need a Constitution? European Law Journal, 1(3), 282–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groß, L. (2015). The Journey from Global to Local: Norm Promotion, Contestation and Localisation in Post-war Kosovo. Journal of International Relations and Development, 18(3), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2015.16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2001). Why Europe Needs a Constitution. New Left Review, 11, 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häggman, J. (2010). Multilingualism and the European Union. Europäisches Journal Für Minderheitenfragen, 4(2), 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2013, March 6). Learning Languages a Way Out of Crisis, Says Vassiliou. EurActiv. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/languages-culture/news/learning-languages-a-way-out-of-crisis-says-vassiliou/.

  • Hoffmann, M. J. (2010). Norms and Social Constructivism in International Relations. In R. A. Denemark (Ed.), The International Studies Encyclopedia (Vol. 8, pp. 5410–5426). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan-Brun, G., & Wolff, S. (2003). Minority Languages in Europe: An Introduction to the Current Debate. In G. Hogan-Brun & S. Wolff (Eds.), Minority Languages in Europe: Frameworks, Status, Prospects (pp. 3–15). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzscheiter, A. (2011). Power of Discourse or Discourse of the Powerful?: The Reconstruction of Global Childhood Norms in the Drafting of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Journal of Language & Politics, 10(1), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, M., & Agarin, T. (2012). The End of Minority Languages? Europe’s Regional Languages in Perspective. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 11(1), 88–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, I. (2005). The Strategic Use of Liberal Internationalism: Libya and the UN Sanctions, 1992–2003. International Organization, 59(3), 495–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose, B. (2018). Norm Contestation: Insights into Non-Conformity with Armed Conflict Norms. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). In P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. (2010). The European Bureau for Lesser-Used Languages. European Journal of Language Policy, 2(1), 138–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, P. A. (2000). Political Unity and Linguistic Diversity in Europe. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 41(1), 138–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, P. A. (2007). Intercultural Recognition and Linguistic Diversity in Europe. In D. Castiglione & C. Longman (Eds.), The Language Question in Europe and Diverse Societies: Political, Legal and Social Perspectives (pp. 61–80). Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, P. A., & Kazlauskaitė-Gürbüz, R. (2014). Addressing Linguistic Diversity in the European Union: Strategies and Dilemmas. Ethnicities, 14(4), 517–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausneker, V. (2000). Sign Languages and the Minority Language Policy of the European Union. In M. Metzger (Ed.), Bilingualism and Identity in Deaf Communities (pp. 142–160). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2011). Political Strategies and Language Policies: The European Union Lisbon Strategy and Its Implications for the EU’s Language and Multilingualism Policy. Language Policy, 10(2), 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liese, A. (2009). Exceptional Necessity: How Liberal Democracies Contest the Prohibition of Torture and Ill-Treatment when Countering Terrorism. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 5(1), 17–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, A. H. (2017). Democracy and Minority Language Recognition: Tyranny of the Majority and the Conditional Effects of Group Size. Democratization, 24(3), 544–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, P. (2017). Language Rights and the Council of Europe: A Failed Response to a Multilingual Continent? Ethnicities, 17(5), 603–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. (1996). “Unity in Diversity”. Some Tensions in the Construction of Europe. Social Anthropology, 4(1), 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C. (1999). Political Legitimacy and the Invisibility of Politics: Exploring the European Union’s Communication Deficit. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4), 617–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mos, M. (2018). Normative Ties That Bind? Contesting National and Sexual Minority Rights in a Post-Enlargement Europe. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanz, P. (2006). Europolis: Constitutional Patriotism Beyond the Nation-State. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nic Craith, M. (2006). Europe and the Politics of Language: Citizens, Migrants and Outsiders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nic Shuibhne, N. (2007). Minority Languages, Law and Politics: Tracing EC Action. In D. Castiglione & C. Longman (Eds.), The Language Question in Europe and Diverse Societies: Political, Legal and Social Perspectives (pp. 123–147). Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • NPLD. (n.d.). The European Roadmap for Linguistic Diversity: Towards a New Approach on Languages as Part of the European Agenda 2020. Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.npld.eu/uploads/publications/313.pdf.

  • Ó Riagáin, D. (2001). The European Union and Lesser Used Languages. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 3(1), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke, B. (2011). Galician and Irish in the European Context: Attitudes Towards Weak and Strong Minority Languages. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, W. (2008). Dynamics of International Norm Change: Rules Against Wartime Plunder. European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), 101–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput.’. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolfo, M. (2009). Unity in Diversity: The Role of the European Parliament in Promoting Minority Languages in Europe. In S. Pertot, T. M. S. Priestly, & C. H. Williams (Eds.), Rights, Promotion and Integration Issues for Minority Languages in Europe (pp. 32–43). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman, E. N. (2003). Dilemmas of Democracy in the European Union. In T. K. Rabb & E. N. Suleiman (Eds.), The Making and Unmaking of Democracy: Lessons from History and World Politics (pp. 134–159). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1998). The Dynamics of Democratic Exclusion. Journal of Democracy, 9(4), 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenz, H.-J. (2007). Reconciling Diversity and Unity: Language Minorities and European Integration. Ethnicities, 7(2), 157–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakatika, M. (2007). Governance vs. Politics: The European Union’s Constitutive ‘Democratic Deficit.’. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(6), 867–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Steeg, M. (2002). Rethinking the Conditions for a Public Sphere in the European Union. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(4), 499–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Els, T. (2005). Multilingualism in the European Union. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 263–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, P. (2011). Linguistic Justice for Europe and for the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venzke, I. (2009). Legal Contestation about “Enemy Combatants”: On the Exercise of Power in Legal Interpretation. Journal of International Law and International Relations, 5(1), 155–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M., & Lombardo, E. (2007). Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach. In M. Verloo (Ed.), Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe (pp. 21–49). Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vizi, B. (2016). Territoriality and Minority Language Rights. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 23(4), 429–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J. M. (2013). Norm Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5, 365–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, A. (2004). Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 10(2), 189–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, A. (2014). A Theory of Contestation. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, A. (2018). Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. H. (2008). Linguistic Minorities in Democratic Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. H. (2009). Let Freedom Reign: The Impress of EU Integration on Minority Survival. In E. Prügl & M. Thiel (Eds.), Diversity in the European Union (pp. 185–203). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2012). Language, Power and Identity. Language Teaching, 45(2), 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2009). The Elephant in the Room: Language Issues in the European Union. European Journal of Language Policy, 1(2), 93–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zappettini, F. (2014). ‘A Badge of Europeanness’: Shaping Identity Through the European Union’s Institutional Discourse on Multilingualism. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(3), 375–402.

    Google Scholar 

Interviews

  • Climent-Ferrando, Vicent. European Network to Promote Linguistic Diversity, face-to-face interview, Brussels, 26 February 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfmann, Herbert. MEP (EPP/Italy), face-to-face interview, Brussels, 20 April 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giménez Barbat, María Teresa. MEP (ALDE/Spain), face-to-face interview, Brussels, 23 May 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Davyth. European Language Equality Network, phone interview, 26 April 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sógor, Csaba. MEP (EPP/Romania), face-to-face interview, Brussels, 18 February 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Helga. MEP (ECR/Belgium), face-to-face interview, Brussels, 15 March 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martijn Mos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mos, M. (2020). Diverting Linguistic Diversity: The Politics of Multilingualism in the European Parliament. In: Strani, K. (eds) Multilingualism and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40701-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40701-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40700-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40701-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics