Skip to main content

The Development of an Artificial Intelligence Assistant for Participatory Design in the Engineering Design Educational Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education (ICL 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1134))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Participatory design (PD) is a method that focuses on the nature of collaboration, enabling users to participate actively in the design process and assess the feasibility of the design and give feedback. The characteristics make it suitable for application in the field of education, to train students to explore the user’s needs for products and participate in the solution of the problem. However, applying PD in the educational environment is not easy because it is difficult to find product users to participate in the teaching process throughout the school. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to design, construct, and develop a smart voice assistant. It can act like a product user to have a smooth conversation with students. The intelligent voice assistant will give feedback to students. This study has analyzed the dialogue between users and designers by the past PD research and found out the intention in the process of dialogue based on the engineering design process. And based on these intentions, the experience in the use of products, product requirements, unmet, and other information was collected into the database. The developed intelligent voice assistant can partially replace the real user in the PD. An experiment will be conducted to confirm the effectiveness of the developed intelligent voice assistant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tomiyama, T., Gu, P., Jin, Y., Lutters, D., Kind, C., Kimura, F.: Design methodologies: industrial and educational applications. CIRP Ann. 58, 543–565 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schön, D.A.: Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Wiley, Hoboken (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hennessy, S., Murphy, P.: The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 9, 1–36 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shen, W., Ghenniwa, H.: Multidisciplinary design optimization: a framework for technology integration (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wu, S., Ghenniwa, H., Shen, W.: User model of a personal assistant in collaborative design environments. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia, pp. 39–54 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halskov, K., Hansen, N.B.: The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002–2012. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 74, 81–92 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanders, E.B.N.: From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In: Design and the Social Sciences, pp. 18–25 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P., Hillgren, P.A.: Design things and design thinking: contemporary participatory design challenges. Des. Issues 28, 101–116 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang, M., Choo, P., Watters, C.E.: Design for experiencing: participatory design approach with multidisciplinary perspectives. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 174, 830–833 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kvan, T.: The pedagogy of virtual design studios. Autom. Constr. 10, 345–353 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P.: The weaving-design process as a dual-space search. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P.: Towards participatory design in craft and design education. CoDesign 1, 103–117 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nabiyev, V.V.: Yapay zeka: problemler-yöntemler-algoritmalar. Seçkin Yayıncılık (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Canbek, N.G., Mutlu, M.E.: On the track of artificial intelligence: learning with intelligent personal assistants. J. Hum. Sci. 13, 592–601 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mauldin, M.L.: CHATTERBOTS, TINYMUDS, and the turing test: entering the Loebner prize competition. In: AAAI, pp. 16–21 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Joyner, D.: Squeezing the limeade: policies and workflows for scalable online degrees. In: L@ S, Article no. 53, p. 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shawar, B.A., Atwell, E.: Using dialogue corpora to train a ChatBot. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Corpus Linguistics 2003, pp. 681–690 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Toth, P., Rudas, I., Ali, S.: Web-based learning and web mining. In: The Asian Conference on Technology in the Classroom: The Impact of Innovation: Technology and You, pp. 101–113 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gogh, E., Kovari, A.: Examining the relationship between lifelong learning and language learning in a vocational training institution. J. Appl. Tech. Educ. Sci. 8, 52–69 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. André, E., Rist, T., Müller, J.: WebPersona: a life-like presentation agent for educational applications on the world-wide web. In: Proceedings of Workshop “Intelligent Educational Systems on the World Wide Web” at AI-ED, pp. 78–85 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw, E., Johnson, W.L., Ganeshan, R.: Pedagogical agents on the web. In: Agents, pp. 283–290 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Person, N.K.: AutoTutor improves deep learning of computer literacy: is it the dialog or the talking head. Artif. Intell. Educ. Shap. Future Learn. Intell. Technol. 97, 47 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lester, J.C., Stone, B.A., Stelling, G.D.: Lifelike pedagogical agents for mixed-initiative problem solving in constructivist learning environments. User Model. Useradapted Interact. 9, 1–44 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kerlyl, A., Hall, P., Bull, S.: Bringing chatbots into education: towards natural language negotiation of open learner models. In: International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 179–192. Springer, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Han, K.W., Lee, E., Lee, Y.: The impact of a peer-learning agent based on pair programming in a programming course. IEEE Trans. Educ. 53, 318–327 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Atman, C.J., Adams, R.S., Cardella, M.E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., Saleem, J.: Engineering design processes: a comparison of students and expert practitioners. J. Eng. Educ. 96, 359–379 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Kai Yao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chien, YH., Hsiao, HS., Chang, YS., Yao, CK. (2020). The Development of an Artificial Intelligence Assistant for Participatory Design in the Engineering Design Educational Environment. In: Auer, M., Hortsch, H., Sethakul, P. (eds) The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education. ICL 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1134. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40274-7_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics