Skip to main content

Engagement in Learning Through Design and Experimentation with Robots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education (ICL 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1135))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this research we characterize students’ engagement in learning in robotic environments and factors that influence engagement. We observed robotics activities of a group of 20 eleventh graders from a technological school, majoring in mechanical engineering. We searched for repeated learning behaviors and elicited patterns of student’s engagement. For the analysis of these patterns we applied Goldin’s theory of engagement structures. To determine the factors affecting students’ engagement, we took teachers’ explanations of possible reasons behind the observed students’ behaviors. The explanations and student interviews were used to determine factors of student engagement. Our study explores and extends the group of known engagement structures related to learning in robotic environment. The knowledge of factors of student engagement can facilitate selecting proper strategies of robotics education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Johnson, J.: Children, robotics, and education. Artif. Life Robot. 7(1), 16–21 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-003-0265-5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bers, M.U., Ponte, I., Juelich, K., Viera, A., Schenker, J.: Teachers as designers: integrating robotics in early childhood education. Inf. Technol. Childhood Educ. 2002, 123–145 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schermerhorn, P., Scheutz, M., Crowell, C.R.: Robot social presence and gender: do females view robots differently than males? In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 263–270 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldin, G.A., Epstein, Y.M., Schorr, R.Y., Warner, L.B.: Beliefs and engagement structures: behind the affective dimension of mathematical learning. ZDM – Int. J. Math. Educ. 43(4), 547–560 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trowler, V.: Student engagement literature review. High. Educ. Acad. 11(1), 1–15 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Newmann, F.M.: Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools. Teachers College Press, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lei, H., Cui, Y., Zhou, W.: Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J. 46(3), 517–528 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hand, V., Penuel, W.: Engagement vs motivation: creating and sustaining learning in STEM. University of Colorado Boulder, 25 January 2018

    Google Scholar 

  9. Verner, I., Massarwe, K., Bshouty, D.: Constructs of engagement emerging in an ethnomathematically-based teacher education course. J. Math. Behav. 32(3), 494–507 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Verner, I.M., Revzin, L.B.: Robotics in School Chemistry Laboratories, vol. 630, pp. 127–135 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaburlasos, V.G., Vrochidou, E.: Social robots for pedagogical rehabilitation: trends and novel modeling principles. In: Cyber-Physical Systems for Social Applications, pp. 1–21. IGI Global (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., Pezalla-Granlund, M.: New pathways into robotics: strategies for broadening participation. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 17(1), 59–69 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kynigos, C.: Black-and-white-box perspectives to distributed control and constructionism in learning with robotics. In: Proceedings of SIMPAR Workshops, pp. 1–9 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barco, A., Albo-Canals, J., Garriga, C.: Engagement based on a customization of an iPod-LEGO robot for a long-term interaction for an educational purpose. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 124–125. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. FluidSurveys Team. Exploratory research: what is it? And 4 ways to implement it in your research (2014). http://fluidsurveys.com/university/exploratory-research-4-ways-implement-research/

  16. Hatch, J.A.: Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. State University of New York Press, Albany (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

A greatest acknowledge Leonid Revzin and Gilad Benski for the generous collaboration and support throughout this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Verner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perez, H., Verner, I. (2020). Engagement in Learning Through Design and Experimentation with Robots. In: Auer, M., Hortsch, H., Sethakul, P. (eds) The Impact of the 4th Industrial Revolution on Engineering Education. ICL 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1135. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40271-6_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics