Skip to main content

Welfare Transformation and Social Work: A Learning-by-Doing Process Looking for New Balances

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Work Education

Abstract

This chapter studies the effects of the welfare crisis and the transformations that have occurred in social work, applying a street-level perspective. The decision-making process of caseworkers is analysed by examining field research conducted in a north-eastern region of Italy on the recent implementation of the minimum income measure. The research involved around 200 social service caseworkers. It highlights how they are dealing with the changes, interpreting and reinterpreting the space they have for discretion. Specifically, they are providing their own interpretations of some new and rather undefined key concepts, such as personalisation, activation, social support, and pacts with beneficiaries, introducing needed flexibility and learning by doing to absorb the change.

This chapter is the result of a joint work and exchange between the authors. However, paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 5 shall be attributed to Tatiana Saruis and paragraph 4 shall be attributed to Stella Volturo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alleanza contro la povertà. (2017). Rapporto di valutazione: dal SIA al REI. Ricerca valutativa sulla prima fase di implementazione del programma di contrasto della povertà Sostegno per l’Inclusione Attiva. https://bit.ly/2UJBXul.

  • Armingeon, K., & Bonoli, G. (Eds.). (2006). The politics of postindustrial welfare states. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahle, T., Hubl, V., & Pfeifer, M. (2011). The last safety net: A handbook of minimum income protection in Europe. Bristol: Bristol Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, J. C. (2008, September). The puzzling resilience of nations in the context of Europeanized welfare states. Communication to the RC19 Meeting “The future of social citizenship: Politics, institutions and outcomes”. Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodkin, E. Z. (2008). Accountability in street-level organizations. Journal of Public Administration, 31, 317–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 253–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodkin, E. Z., & Martson, G. (2013). Work and the welfare state. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brondani, M. A., MacEntee, M. I., Bryant, S. R., & O’Neill, B. (2008). Using written vignettes in focus groups among older adults to discuss oral health as a sensitive topic. Qualitative Health Research, 18(8), 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, K. (2005). Street-level discretion: Is there a need for control? Public Administration Quarterly, 29(2), 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1994). After the golden age: The future of the welfare state in the new global order. Geneve: UNRISD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A., & Myles, J. (Eds.). (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (2004). Transformation of the welfare state: The silent surrender of public responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICF & European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research. (2019, November 15–16). Peer Review on Minimum Income Benefits—Securing a life in dignity, enabling access to services and integration into the labour market (Synthesis Report). Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRS, CLES, Fondazione Zancan. (2001). Valutazione di efficacia della I sperimentazione dell’istituto del Reddito Minimo di Inserimento in 39 Comuni italiani (1999–2001). Roma: Presidenza del Consiglio. Dipartimento per gli Affari Sociali.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRS, CLES, Fondazione Labos. (2005). Valutazione di efficacia della II sperimentazione dell’istituto del Reddito Minimo di Inserimento in Italia (2003–2004). Roma: Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidi, R. (2012). «Effetti corrosivi?» Problematizzare l’impatto del New Public Management e della governance sui social workers del settore pubblico. Rivista Trimestrale Di Scienza Dell’Amministrazione, 3, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupe, P., Hill, M., & Buffat, A. (2015). Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J. (2004). Catching up to reality: Building the case for a new social model (CPRN Social Architecture Papers, Research Report F|35). Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc. (CPRN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazepov, Y. (Ed.). (2010). Rescaling social policies: Towards multilevel governance in Europe. Burlington: Ashgate and European Centre Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracies: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, I., & Nelson, K. (Eds.). (2013). Minimum income protection in flux. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranci, C. (Ed.). (2010). Social vulnerability in Europe social vulnerability in Europe: The new configuration of social risks. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemer, J. W. (1977). Varieties of opportunistic research. Urban Life, 5(4), 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, C., & Negri, N. (Eds.). (2003). Povertà e vulnerabilità sociale in aree sviluppate. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saruis, T. (2015). Gli operatori sociali nel nuovo welfare. Tra discrezionalità e responsabilità. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorén, K. H. (2008). Activation policy in action: A street-level study of social assistance in the Swedish welfare state. Växjö: Växjö University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifiletti, R. (2004). Towards a qualitative research design? Cross-National Research Papers, 7(2), 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana Saruis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saruis, T., Volturo, S. (2020). Welfare Transformation and Social Work: A Learning-by-Doing Process Looking for New Balances. In: S.M., S., Baikady, R., Sheng-Li, C., Sakaguchi, H. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Work Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39966-5_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39966-5_60

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39965-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39966-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics