Abstract
The recovery of the concept of reification in Marx’s work claims a theoretical reordering of the concepts related to it, always under the frame of the real character of abstraction. Within this conceptual field, which is a problematic trope, the author stops at the semantic variations that were produced in Marx regarding the concept of alienation. While in his earlier works the concept of alienation appeared as the domination of the thing and wealth by an estranged power, in his later works it is further enriched from the point of view of abstract labor, the conditions of possibility of which are given by the process of autonomization and objectification of labor’s social form.
This text is the revised version of an article that will appear shortly in Garofalo and Quante (2017): Attualitá di Marx in Italian.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
‘As use values or goods, commodities are corporeally distinct things. Their existence as value, in contrast, constitutes their unity. This unity does not originate in nature, but rather in society’ (MEGA II/5: 19). Things are similar with regard to the ‘substance’ of value: ‘As useful activity directed to the appropriation of natural factors in one form or another, labour is a natural condition of human existence, a condition of material interchange between man and nature, quite independent of the form of society. On the other hand, the labour which posits exchange value is a specific social form of labour. For example, tailoring if one considers its physical aspect as a distinct productive activity produces a coat, but not the exchange value of the coat. The exchange value is produced by it not as tailoring as such but as abstract universal labour, and this belongs to a social framework not devised by the tailor’ (Marx and Engels 2010b: 278).
- 5.
See: ‘by equating their different products to each other in exchange as values, they equate their different kinds of labour as human labour’ (Marx 1976: 166).
- 6.
‘Tailoring and weaving’ both ‘therefore possess the general property of being human labour, and they therefore have to be considered in certain cases, such as the production of value, solely from this point of view’ (Marx 1976: 150). ‘In every social form of labor, individual acts of labor of different individuals are also related to each other as human labor, but here, this relationship itself counts as the specific social form of the acts of labor’ (MEGA II/5 1983: 41).
- 7.
See: ‘The validation of concern here is neither one agreed upon by those engaging in exchange, nor imposed by the state. Rather, it is a relation structurally given in an economy based upon exchange’ (Heinrich 2008: 119).
- 8.
This state of affairs arises from a passage in Capital that is usually not understood, in which Marx on the one hand emphasizes that it’s only a specific social relationship between people ‘which assumes here, for them, the fantastic form of a relation between things’ (Marx 1976: 165) and on the other hand writes that ‘to the producers, therefore, the social relations between their private labours appear as what they are, i.e. they do not appear as direct social relations between persons in their work, but rather as material [dinglich] relations between persons and social relations between things’ (ibid.: 166). On this, see Wolf (1985: 217).
- 9.
What ‘vanishes’ in the empirical forms of wealth is not the fact that labor is necessary to create its material bearers, but rather that the form itself is the exclusive result of a specific social relation, abstract labor as the substance of value.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
See also: ‘the effects of a certain social form of labour are ascribed to objects, to the products of this labour; the relationship itself is imagined to exist in material form. We have already seen that this is a characteristic of labour based on commodity production, on exchange value, and this quid pro quo is revealed in the commodity, in money […] and to a still higher degree in capital’ (Marx and Engels 2010c: 428).
- 13.
See also: ‘this fetishism of the world of commodities arises from the peculiar social character of the labour which produces them’ (Marx 1976: 165).
- 14.
References
Bitterolf, M., & Maier, D. (Eds.). (2012). Verdinglichung, Marxismus, Geschichte. Von der Niederlage der Novemberrevolutionzurkritischen Theorie. Freiburg i. Br.: Ca Ira.
Brentel, H. (1989). Soziale Form und ökonomisches Objekt. Studienzum Gegenstands- und Methodenverständnis der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Colletti, L. (1977). Marxismus und Dialektik. Frankfurt M.; Berlin; Wien: Ullstein.
Dannemann, R. (1987). Das Prinzip Verdinglichung. Studiezur Philosophie Georg Lukács. Frankfurt/M: Sendler.
Deutsche Zeitschriftfür Philosophie. (2011). Schwerpunkt Verdinglichung, 59 (5).
Elbe, I. (2008). Marxismus-Mystizismus – oder: Die Verwandlung der Marxschen Theorie in deutsche Ideologie. In Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen des Berliner Vereinszur Förderung der MEGA-Edition, Heft 6: Gesellschaftliche Praxis und ihrewissenschaftliche Darstellung. Beiträgezur ‘Kapital’-Diskussion (pp. 187–209). Berlin: Argument.
Elbe, I. (2010). Marx im Westen. Die neue Marx-Lektüre in der Bundesrepublik, zweitekorr. Aufl. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Ellmers, S. (2016). Abstrakte Arbeit und Anerkennung. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.
Esfeld, M. (2002). Holismus. In der Philosophie des Geistes und in der Philosophie der Physik. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
Fischer, A. M. (1978). Der reale Schein und die Theorie des Kapitals bei Karl Marx. Zürich: Europa Verlag.
Friesen, H., & Lotz, C. (Eds.). (2012). Ding und Verdinglichung: Technik- und Sozialphilosophie nach Heidegger und der Kritischen Theorie. Wilhelm Fink.
Garofalo, P., & Quante, M. (Eds.). (2017). Lo spettro è tornato! Attualità della filosofia di Marx. Milano; Udine: Mimesis.
Grigat, S. (2007). Fetisch und Freiheit. Über die Rezeption der Marxschen Fetischkritik, die Emanzipation von Staat und Kapital und die Kritik des Antisemitismus. Freiburg i. Br.: Ca Ira.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1999). Wissenschaft der Logik. Zweites Buch: Die Lehrevom Wesen. In Id., Hauptwerke in 6 Bänden. Hamburg: Meiner.
Heinrich, M. (1994). Abstrakte Arbeit. In W. F. Haug (Ed.), Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus (pp. 56–64). Band 1. Hamburg: Argument.
Heinrich, M. (2008). Wie das Marxsche Kapital lesen? Hinweisezur Lektüre und Kommentarzum Anfang von “Das Kapital”. Stuttgart: Schmetterling.
Heinrich, M. (2013). Wie das Marxsche Kapital lesen? Leseanleitung und Kommentarzum Anfang des “Kapital”. Teil 2. Stuttgart: Schmetterling.
Honneth, A. (2005). Verdinglichung. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
Iorio, M. (2010). Fetisch und Geheimnis. Zur Kritik der Kapitalismuskritik von Karl Marx. In Deutsche Zeitschriftfür Philosophie (pp. 241–256). 58/Heft 2.
Jappe, A. (2005). Die Abenteuer der Ware. Füreineneue Wertkritik. Münster: Unrast.
Lindner, U. (2013). Marx und die Philosophie. Wissenschaftlicher Realismus, ethischer Perfektionismus und kritische Sozialtheorie. Stuttgart: Schmetterling.
Lukács, G. (1970). Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein. Studienübermarxistische Dialektik. Neuwied; Berlin: Luchterhand.
Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse (Martin Nicolaus, Trans.). London: Penguin.
Marx, K. (1976). Capital, Vol. 1 (Ben Fowkes, Trans.). London: Penguin.
Marx, K. (1981). Capital, Vol. 3 (David Fernbach, Trans.). London: Penguin.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2010a). Marx-Engels Collected Works (Vol. 3). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2010b). Marx-Engels Collected Works (Vol. 29). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2010c). Marx-Engels Collected Works (Vol. 32). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
MEGA II/5. (1983). Das Kapital. Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie. Erster Band, Hamburg 1867.
MEGA II/6. (1987). Das Kapital. Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie. Erster Band, Hamburg 1872.
Postone, M. (1993). Time, Labor and Social Domination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reichardt, T. (2008). Aporien der soziologischen Erkenntnistheorie Alfred Sohn-Rethels. In Wissenschaftliche Mitteilungen des Berliner Vereinszur Förderung der MEGA-Edition, Heft 6: Gesellschaftliche Praxis und ihrewissenschaftliche Darstellung. Beiträgezur ‘Kapital’-Diskussion (pp. 242–266). Berlin: Argument.
Sohn-Rethel, A. (1973). Geistige und körperliche Arbeit. Zur Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Synthesis, Erg.u. überarb. Aufl. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
Wallat, H. (2009). Der Begriff der Verkehrungim Denken von Marx. In Marx-Engels-Jahrbuch 2008 (pp. 68–102).
Wolf, D. (1985). Ware und Geld. Der dialektische Widerspruchim Kapital. Hamburg: VSA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elbe, I. (2020). Reification and Real Abstraction in Marx’s Critique of Political Economy. In: Oliva, A., Oliva, Á., Novara, I. (eds) Marx and Contemporary Critical Theory. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39954-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39954-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39953-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39954-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)