Skip to main content

Distance as Determinant of FDI in Transition Countries. The Case of Serbia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Economic and Financial Challenges for Balkan and Eastern European Countries

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

  • 524 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to define the meaning and the role of distance in determining cross-border investment transactions. Specifically, it aims to use Serbia as an individual country case demonstrating the implementation of a model based on Ghemawat’s culture, administrative, geographic, and economic distances (CAGE) framework for testing the key distance-related determinants of the foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows to a country. Since 2000, Serbia has embarked on an extensive political and economic reforms program, having achieved democratic stability by now. Its economic growth has been mainly driven by foreign direct investments. This paper analyzes how each one of distance dimensions, i.e., cultural, administrative, geographic, and economic, affects FDI inflows to Serbia. The empirical application of the model shows that cultural distance affects FDI flows negatively, while administrative, geographic, and economic distances have a positive effect on FDI inflows to Serbia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arslan, A., & Larimo, J. (2010). Ownership strategy of multinational enterprises and the impacts of regulative and normative institutional distance: Evidence from finnish foreign direct investments in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of East-West Business, 16(3), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W. (1956). Distance and the pattern of intra-European trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 28, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, H., Guillén M. F., & Zhou N. (2010). An institutional approach to cross-national distance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1460–1480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D., & Brouthers, L. E. (2001). Explaining the national cultural distance paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, B. G., Le, Q. V., & Rishi, M. (2012). Foreign direct investment and institutional quality: Some empirical evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21, 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse, M., & Hefeker, C. (2007). Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(2), 397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, M. C. H., & Kumar, V. (2010). The impact of institutional distance on the international diversity–performance relationship. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daude, C., & Stein, E. (2007). The quality of institutions and foreign direct investment. Economics and Politics, 19(3), 317–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikova, D., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2007). Foreign direct investment mode choice: entry and establishment modes in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 1013–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drogendijk, R., & Slagengen, A. (2006). Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choice by multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 15, 361–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9, 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (2001). The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: Past, present and future. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2), 173–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger, P., & Winner, H. (2005). Evidence on corruption as an incentive for foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(4), 932–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erramilli, M. (1996). Nationality and subsidiary ownership patterns in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., Baghdasaryan, D., & Meyer, K. E. (2009). The impact of institutional and human resource distance on international entry strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 46(7), 1171–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat Statistics Database. (2017). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Foreign_direct_investment_statistics. Accessed June 1, 2017.

  • FDI Markets database. (2017). Available https://www.fdimarkets.com/. Accessed April 11, 2017.

  • Filipovic, M., Hadzic, M., & Pavic, M. (2006). Privatisation process and the role of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Serbia-montentegro. Agora Without Frontiers, 12(2), 218–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A. S., Delios, A., & Singh, K. (2007). Institutional environments, staffing strategies and subsidiary performance. Journal of Management, 33(4), 611–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaur, A. S., & Lu, W. (2007). Ownership strategies and survival of foreign subsidiaries: Impacts of institutional distance and experience. Journal of Management, 33(1), 84–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2007). Redefining global strategy: Crossing borders in a world where differences still matter. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, P. (2010). The globalization of markets. In Globalization note series. Available http://www.ghemawat.com/management/files/AcademicResources/Globalization%20of%20Markets.pdf.

  • Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (2002). Global foreign direct investment flows: The role of governance infrastructure. World Development, 30(11), 899–1919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habib, M., & Zurawicki, L. (2002). Corruption and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 33, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M., & Lovas, B. (2004). How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8:4), 801–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, P., & Ursprung, H. W. (2002). Do civil and political repression really boost foreign direct investments? Economic Inquiry, 40(4), 651–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2002). Illusory border effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. CEPII working paper 2002-01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennart, J. F., & Larimo, J. (1998). The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Does national origin affect ownership decisions? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 515–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences, international differences in work- related values. Abridged edition, SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (1991). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. USA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. (1976, 1960 dissertation). The international operations of nation firms: A study of foreign direct investments. Cambridge: MLP Press. Available at: http://teaching.ust.hk/~mgto650p/meyer/readings/1/01_Hymer.pdf.

  • Iyer, G. R. (1997). Comparative marketing: An interdisciplinary framework for institutional analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(3), 531–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javorcik, B. S. (2004). The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. European Economic Review, 48(1), 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, N. M. (2003). Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization, 57(3), 587–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. L., Cullen, J. B., & Sakano, T. (1991). Cultural congruency in international joint ventures: Does it matter? In Proceedings of the Eastern Academy of Management Fourth Biennial International Conference. Nice, France, June 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne J. E. (1977). The internalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, Spring/Summer, 8, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (1999). Aggregating governance indicators. In Policy research paper 2195, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Hwang, P. (1992). Global strategy and multinational entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad, I., & Villanger, E. (2008). Determinants of foreign direct investment in services. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(2), 518–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. (1997). Country institutional profiles: Concept and measurement. In Academy of Management Proceedings (pp. 180–184).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. T., & Guisinger, S. (1991). Comparative business failures of foreign-controlled firms in the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(2), 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, T, & Zignago, S. (2005). Market access in global and regional trade. CEPII working paper 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith—A failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mengistu, A. A., & Adhikary, B. K. (2011). Does good governance matter for FDI inflows? Evidence from Asian Economies, Asia Pacific Business Review, 17(3), 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom, K. A., & Vahlne, J. E. (1994). Is the world shrinking? Psychic distance and the establishment of Swedish sales subsidiaries during the last 100 years. In Landeck, M. (Eds.), International Trade: Regional and Global Issues (pp. 41–56). New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa, T. (1979). International investment and industrial structure: New theoretical implications from the Japanese experience. Oxford Economic Papers, 31(1), 72–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (1997). The effect of national culture, organizational complementarity, and economic motivation on joint venture dissolution. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 279–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., Takeuchi, E., & Sakakibara, H. M. (2000). Can Japan compete?. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quazi, R. (2007). Economic freedom and foreign direct investment in East Asia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 12(3), 329–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1975). The economics of corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 4(2), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H. S. (2008). Cultural value orientations: Nature & implications of national differences. Moscow: Publishing House of SU HSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(3), 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solocha, A., & Soskin, M. D. (1994). Canadian direct investment, mode of entry, and border location. MIR: Management International Review, 34(1), 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2001). The role of national culture in international marketing research. International Marketing Review, 18(1), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (WIIW). (2016). Available https://data.wiiw.ac.at/. Accessed December 5, 2016.

  • Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., & Russell, C. J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. J., & Mixon, F. G. (2004). Strategic factors affecting foreign direct investment decisions by multi- national enterprises in Latin America. Journal of World Business, 39(2), 233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, E., & Yip, P. (2007). Economic distance and the survival of foreign direct investments. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1156–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuman, J. P., & Emmert, C. E. (1999). Explaining Japanese foreign direct investment in Latin America, 1979–1992. Social Science Quarterly, 80(3), 539–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voyer, P. A., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). The effect of corruption on Japanese foreign direct investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(30), 211–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, S. J. (2000). How taxing is corruption on internal investors? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, D., & Mody, A. (1992). International investment location decisions: The case of U.S. firms. Journal of International Economics, 33(1–2), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2005). Available http://www.worldbank.org/. Accessed April 20, 2017.

  • Xu, D. (2001). The effect of institutional distance on multinational enterprise strategy. York University, Toronto: PhD Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., Pan, Y., & Beamish, P. W. (2004). The effect of regulative and normative distances on MNE ownership and expatriate strategies. Management International Review, 44(3), 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., & Shenkar, O. (2002). Institutional distance and multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 608–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W. C. (1997). Business networks and transnational corporations: A study of Hong-Kong firms in the ASEAN region. Economic Geography, 73(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, D., & Makino, S. (2002). The choice between joint venture and wholly owned subsidiary: An institutional perspective. Organization Science, 13(6), 667–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino, M. Y. (1976). Japan’s multinational enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, S., & Zaheer, A. (1997). Country effects on information seeking in global electronic networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1), 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitrios Kyrkilis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1

Aggregation of the manufacturing industry according to technological intensity and based on NACE Rev.2

High technology

• Manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products and pharmaceutical preparations

• Manufacture of computer, electronic, and optical products

• Manufacture of air and spacecraft and related machinery

Medium-high technology

• Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products

• Manufacture of weapons and ammunition

• Manufacture of electrical equipment

• Manufacture of machinery and equipment n.e.c.

• Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers, and semi-trailers

• Manufacture of other transport equipment excluding building of ships and boats and excluding manufacture of air and spacecraft and related machinery

• Manufacture of medical and dental instruments and supplies

Medium-low technology

• Reproduction of recorded media

• Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products

• Manufacture of rubber and plastic products

• Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products

• Manufacture of basic metals

• Manufacture of fabricated metal products, except machinery and equipment excluding manufacture of weapons and ammunition

• Building of ships and boats

• Repair and installation of machinery and equipment

Low technology

• Manufacture of food products

• Manufacture of beverages

• Manufacture of tobacco products

• Manufacture of textiles

• Manufacture of wearing apparel

• Manufacture of leather and related products

• Manufacture of wood and of products of wood and cork, except furniture; manufacture of articles of straw and plaiting materials

• Manufacture of paper and paper products

• Printing and reproduction of recorded media excluding reproduction of recorded media

• Manufacture of furniture

• Other manufacturing excluding manufacture of medical and dental instruments and supplies

  1. Source Eurostat, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Glossary:High-tech_classification_of_manufacturing_industries

High tech knowledge-intensive services

· Motion picture, video and television program production, sound recording, and music publishing activities

· Programming and broadcasting activities

· Telecommunications

· Computer programming, consultancy, and related activities

· Information service activities

· Scientific research and development

  1. Source Eurostat, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Knowledge-intensive_services_(KIS)

Appendix 2

World Bank Governance Indicators to measure ID

 

Name of the WGI

Definition

Component of ID

1.

Government effectiveness

The quality of public services; the capacity of the civil service and its independence from political pressures; and the quality of policy formulation

Regulative

2.

Regulatory quality

The ability of the government to provide sound policies and regulations that enable and promote private sector development

Regulative

3.

Rule of law

The extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, including the quality of contract enforcement and property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence

Regulative

4.

Voice and accountability

The extent to which country’s citizens are able to participate in selecting their government, as well as freedom of expression, freedom of association, and a free media

Normative

5.

Quality political stability and absence of violence

The likelihood that the government will be destabilized by unconstitutional or violent means, including terrorism

Normative

  1. Source Kaufmann et al. (1999)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kyrkilis, D., Grujic, N. (2020). Distance as Determinant of FDI in Transition Countries. The Case of Serbia. In: Janowicz-Lomott, M., Łyskawa, K., Polychronidou, P., Karasavvoglou, A. (eds) Economic and Financial Challenges for Balkan and Eastern European Countries. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39927-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics