Skip to main content

Tactical Ambiguity: Materiality, Representation and Interaction in Evan Meaney’s Glitched Portraits

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Error, Ambiguity, and Creativity

Abstract

This essay analyses how an ambiguous experience of art online enables a tactical user position. It does so with a rare combination of media theory on technological dependence and disruption with art historical image readings informed by semiotics and phenomenology, applied in a qualitative case study on Evan Meaney’s video installation To Hold a Future Body so Close to One’s Own (2008). The artwork consists of glitched recordings presented on the artist’s website, analysed together to articulate the positioning of the user. Both empirical and methodological considerations thus engage a multidisciplinary perspective on error, ambiguity and creativity. The essay homes in on materiality, representation and interaction to argue for ambiguity as key to developing user tactics, i.e. a critical stance towards the pervasive socio-digital condition.

This essay is a rewritten and expanded version of a case study in the author’s doctoral thesis, defended in May 2016 and published in September 2016 as a revised edition entitled Flow and Friction: On the Tactical Potential of Interfacing with Glitch Art—see References.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alloa, E. 2011. “Verktyg – skrift – element. Från en fenomenologi om medier till en medial fenomenologi.” In Fenomenologi, teknik och medialitet, edited by L. Dahlberg and H. Ruin, 117–142. Huddinge: Södertörn University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C. 2012. “Automatism and Agency Intertwined: A Spectrum of Photographic Intentionality.” Critical Inquiry 38 (4): 705–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atencia-Linares, P. 2012. “Fiction, Nonfiction, and Deceptive Photographic Representation.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (1): 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. 1977. Image—Music—Text. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.1980. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betancourt, M. 2014. “Critical Glitches and Glitch Art.” HZ Journal 19: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Glitch Art in Theory and Practice: Critical Failures and Post-Digital Aesthetics. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D., and R. Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1988. “Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory.” Theatre Journal 40 (4): 519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 1996–1998. The Information Age I–III. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. 1988. “Sign Event Context.” In Limited Inc, 1–23. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellcessor, E. 2016. Restricted Access: Media, Disability, and the Politics of Participation. New York and London: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K., and G. Goggin. 2015. Disability and the Media. London and New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, E. 2017. What Algorithms Want: Imagination in the Age of Computing. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2011. “Case Study.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 301–316. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, A. R. 2004. Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Interface Effect. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, A. R., and E. Thacker. 2007. The Exploit: A Theory of Networks. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, D. 2013. “Re-reading de Certeau: Invisible Tactics.” Tactical Media Files, May 20, n.p. blog.tacticalmediafiles.net.

  • Grundell, V. 2016. Flow and Friction: On the Tactical Potential of Interfacing with Glitch Art. Stockholm: Art & Theory Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert-Rolfe, J. 2015. “Abstract Video.” In Abstract Video: The Moving Image in Contemporary Art, edited by G. Jennings, 66–78. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–181. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. 2006. “Unfinished Work.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (7–8): 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. K. 2012. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, M. 2007. “Following Pieces: On Performative Photography.” In Photography Theory, edited by J. Elkins, 91–108. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, G. 2015. “Preface: Abstract Video Art” and “Introduction: On the Horizon.” In Abstract Video: The Moving Image in Contemporary Art, edited by G. Jennings, xvii–xx, 1–16. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C. 2009. Cracked Media: The Sound of Malfunction. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, S., and J. Zylinska. 2012. Life After New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kostakis, V., and M. Bauwens. 2014. Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, P. 2011. Noise Channels: Glitch and Error in Digital Culture. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuc, K., and J. Zylinska, eds. 2016. Photomediations: A Reader. London: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagerkvist, A. 2018. Digital Existence: Ontology, Ethics and Transcendence in Digital Culture. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manon, H. S., and D. Temkin. 2011. “Notes on Glitch.” World Picture 6: n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meaney, E. 2019. evanmeaney.com, and Internet Archive Wayback Machine. archive.org/web.

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 2004. “Cézannes tvivel” (“Le doute de Cézanne”) and “Ögat och anden” (“L'oeil et l’esprit”). In Lovtal till filosofin: Essäer i urval, Translated by Anna Petronella Fredlund, 105–125 and 281–319. Stockholm and Stehag: Symposion.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012 [1945]. Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster (MW), Search Terms: Interface. Glitch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montfort, N. 2017. The Future. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moradi, I. 2004. “Gtlch Aesthetics.” BA thesis, School of Design Technology, Department of Architecture, University of Huddersfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, A. 2015. Strange Tools: Art and Human Nature. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, M., ed. 2011. Error: Glitch, Noise and Jam in New Media Cultures. London and New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikka, J. 2012. What Is Media Archeology? Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, R. 2011. Performing Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. 2012. “Photography as Performative Process” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (1): 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundén, J. 2015. “On Trans-, Glitch, and Gender as Machinery of Failure” First Monday 20 (4–6): n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinman, G. 2015. “Getting Messy: Chance and Glitch in Contemporary Video Art.” In Abstract Video: The Moving Image in Contemporary Art edited by G. Jennings, 98–115. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vendela Grundell Gachoud .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grundell Gachoud, V. (2020). Tactical Ambiguity: Materiality, Representation and Interaction in Evan Meaney’s Glitched Portraits. In: Popat, S., Whatley, S. (eds) Error, Ambiguity, and Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39755-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics