Abstract
Activities of translation often look to shift meaning or form from one state to another and, as a consequence, a range of potential transformations can often take place. This essay discusses the material traces of linguistic invention as a means to examine the disruptive and transformative possibilities of translation as a distinct ‘designerly’ activity. Critical design is employed as a method through which ideas and practices of translation can be applied through automatic or machine-derived methods which seek to embrace the inherent mistakes, errors or unintended consequences of such approaches. The results of these activities raise questions relating to a particular value of critical approaches within design and specifically in terms of the characteristics of outcomes that might result from such an enquiry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bardzell, J., and S. Bardzell. 2013. “What Is So Critical About Critical Design?” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 3297–3306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466451.
Bellos, D. 2011. Is That a Fish in Your Ear: Translation and the Meaning of Everything. London: Particular Books.
Dunne, A., and F. Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.
Eichhorn, K. 2016. Adjusted Margin: Xerography, Art and Activism in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.
Emerson, L. 2014. Reading Writing Interfaces: From the Digital to the Bookbound. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Kuijpers, E. 2013. And/Or—On the Contradiction in the Work of Jan van Toorn Extended. Nah Oi.
Kyes, Z., and M. Owens. 2009. “Forms of Agency.” In The Reader—IAPSIS Forum on Design and Critical Practice. Berlin, Germany and New York, NY: Sternberg Press.
Malpass, M. 2015. “Criticism and Function in Critical Design Practice.” Design Issues 31 (2): 59–71.
———. 2016. “Critical Design Practice: Theoretical Perspectives and Methods of Engagement.” The Design Journal 19 (3): 473–489.
———. 2017. Critical Design in Context: History, Theory, and Practices. London: Bloomsbury.
Sword, H. 2002. Ghostwriting Modernism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
van Toorn, J. (ed.). 1998. Design Beyond Design—Critical Reflection and the Practice of Visual Communication. The Netherlands: Jan van Eyck Akadamie.
———. 2010. “A Passion for the Real.” Design Issues 26 (4): 45–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson, P. (2020). Perhaps This Cannot Be Anything (on Exercises in Text Production and Critical Typography, Which Make Use of Machine-Made Errors in Processes of Visual and Semantic Translation). In: Popat, S., Whatley, S. (eds) Error, Ambiguity, and Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39755-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39755-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39754-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39755-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)