Skip to main content

Perhaps This Cannot Be Anything (on Exercises in Text Production and Critical Typography, Which Make Use of Machine-Made Errors in Processes of Visual and Semantic Translation)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Error, Ambiguity, and Creativity
  • 214 Accesses

Abstract

Activities of translation often look to shift meaning or form from one state to another and, as a consequence, a range of potential transformations can often take place. This essay discusses the material traces of linguistic invention as a means to examine the disruptive and transformative possibilities of translation as a distinct ‘designerly’ activity. Critical design is employed as a method through which ideas and practices of translation can be applied through automatic or machine-derived methods which seek to embrace the inherent mistakes, errors or unintended consequences of such approaches. The results of these activities raise questions relating to a particular value of critical approaches within design and specifically in terms of the characteristics of outcomes that might result from such an enquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bardzell, J., and S. Bardzell. 2013. “What Is So Critical About Critical Design?” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 3297–3306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466451.

  • Bellos, D. 2011. Is That a Fish in Your Ear: Translation and the Meaning of Everything. London: Particular Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, A., and F. Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn, K. 2016. Adjusted Margin: Xerography, Art and Activism in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, L. 2014. Reading Writing Interfaces: From the Digital to the Bookbound. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijpers, E. 2013. And/Or—On the Contradiction in the Work of Jan van Toorn Extended. Nah Oi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyes, Z., and M. Owens. 2009. “Forms of Agency.” In The Reader—IAPSIS Forum on Design and Critical Practice. Berlin, Germany and New York, NY: Sternberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, M. 2015. “Criticism and Function in Critical Design Practice.” Design Issues 31 (2): 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. “Critical Design Practice: Theoretical Perspectives and Methods of Engagement.” The Design Journal 19 (3): 473–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Critical Design in Context: History, Theory, and Practices. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sword, H. 2002. Ghostwriting Modernism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Toorn, J. (ed.). 1998. Design Beyond Design—Critical Reflection and the Practice of Visual Communication. The Netherlands: Jan van Eyck Akadamie.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. “A Passion for the Real.” Design Issues 26 (4): 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Wilson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wilson, P. (2020). Perhaps This Cannot Be Anything (on Exercises in Text Production and Critical Typography, Which Make Use of Machine-Made Errors in Processes of Visual and Semantic Translation). In: Popat, S., Whatley, S. (eds) Error, Ambiguity, and Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39755-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics