Abstract
Scientific and analytical advances in lighting design metrics have created a perspective that empirically defines measurable parameters of daylight. These have narrowly focused on illuminance-based metrics of light and energy efficiency of high-performance buildings and disregarded the qualitative and health-effective dimensions of daylight. Design strategies implemented should not only meet green building standards and certification guidelines, but also consider human physiological and psychological responses. The intent of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the design approach of atriums in two LEED educational buildings with regards to building performance, chronobiological benchmarks, and occupant’s behavior. To assess visual comfort and discomfort, light illuminance and spectral power distribution measurements were taken inside both atriums to analyze the spaces throughout a typical equinox day, and at different days for varying sky conditions. The results from this visual environment analysis were then translated to assess health effective light received with the use of the circadian stimulus (CS) and equivalent melanopic lux (EML) metrics. Behavioral logs and surveys were also documented to help establish any patterns that could draw attention to human responses which could identify mediating factors in the indoor environment. Results indicate that illuminance level measurements taken on horizontal planes tend to be greater than those in vertical planes facing different directions. This addresses designers’ misconception that meeting a spatial Daylighting Autonomy at the 300 lux benchmark (sDA300) on the horizontal working plane is sufficient. It is also noted that meeting the sDA300 benchmark is not a strong indicator of maintaining 0.3 circadian stimulus or 250 EML benchmark. Both circadian stimulus and equivalent melanopic lux biological benchmarks appear to be more difficult to meet than the visual task illuminance level benchmark requirements. This chapter highlights how human responses to the design of the luminous environment fit in the overarching scheme of daylighting design parameters and metrics. It emphasizes lesser known potential health effective light metrics adopted in the field for increased applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Raw G (1992) Sick building syndrome: a review of the evidence on causes and solutions. HM Stationery Office, Richmond
Frontczak, M. W., Pawel 2011. Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments. Build Environ, 46, 922-937
Mardaljevic J, Heschong L, Lee E (2009) Daylight metrics and energy savings. Light Res Technol 41:261–283
Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z (2006) Dynamic daylight performance metrics for sustainable building design. Leukos 3:7–31
Van Bommel WJM (2006) Non-visual biological effect of lighting and the practical meaning for lighting for work. Appl Ergon 37:461–466
Khademagha P, Aries M, Rosemann A, Van Loenen E (2016) Implementing non-image-forming effects of light in the built environment: a review on what we need. Build Environ 108:263–272
Serra R (1998) Daylighting. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2:115–155
Moon P (1942) Illumination from a non-uniform sky. Illum Energies (NY) 37:707–726
Reinhart CF (2004) Lightswitch-2002: a model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Sol Energy 77:15–28
Heschong L, Wymelenberg VD, Andersen M, Digert N, Fernandes L, Keller A, Loveland J, Mckay H, Mistrick R, Mosher B (2012) Approved method: IES Spatial daylight autonomy (SDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). IES-Illuminating Engineering Society, New York, NY
Nabil A, Mardaljevic J (2005) useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings. Lighting Res Technol 37:41–57
Vos JJ (1984) Disability glare-a state of the art report. CIE J 3:39–53
de l’Eclairage CI (2004) Ocular lighting effects on human physiology and behaviour. CIE Technical Report, 158
Kent M, Fotios S, Altomonte S (2018) Experimental biases in discomfort glare evaluations. 34th International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (PLEA), PLEA, 2018
Konis K, Selkowitz S (2017) The role of metrics in performance-based design. effective daylighting with high-performance facades. Springer, New York, NY
Wallace LA, Nelson CJ, Dunteman G (1991) Workplace characteristics associated with health and comfort concerns in three office buildings in Washington, DC (No. PB-91-211342/XAB). Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC (United States). Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab
Salinas JL (1982) Artificial light and occupational health. Occup Health Nurs 30:13–15
Kim A, Schiavon S, Graham L, Ko WH (2016) Lighting for circadian health: survey module and non-invasive open-source wearable sensor system. Center for the Built Environment (CBE)
Lucas RJ, Peirson SN, Berson DM, Brown TM, Cooper HM, Czeisler CA, Figueiro MG, Gamlin PD, Lockley SW, O'hagan JB, Price LLA, Provencio I, Skene DJ, Brainard GC (2014) Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age. Trends Neurosci 37:1–9
Enezi JA, Revell V, Brown T, Wynne J, Schlangen L, Lucas R (2011) A “Melanopic” spectral efficiency function predicts the sensitivity of melanopsin photoreceptors to polychromatic lights. J Biol Rhythm 26:314–323
Institute IWB (2019) Well Building Standard V2
Mariana Figueiro MR (2017) Quantifying circadian light and its impact [Online]. Architectural Lighting. Available: https://www.archlighting.com/technology/quantifying-circadian-light-and-its-impact_o
Floor Plan Database (2019) University of Oregon: The High Performance Environments Lab (HiPE)
Hraska J (2015) Chronobiological aspects of green buildings daylighting. Renew Energy 73:109–114
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Al Awadh, S., Elzeyadi, I. (2020). Atrium Design and the Science of Daylighting: A Comparative Field Study. In: Bumajdad, A., Bouhamra, W., Alsayegh, O., Kamal, H., Alhajraf, S. (eds) Gulf Conference on Sustainable Built Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39734-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39734-0_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39733-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39734-0
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)