Skip to main content

Making and Keeping Stakeholders Mindful of CSR

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 1138 Accesses

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, is as prominent a core element in organizations’ performance today as is ethical behavior from each internal stakeholder. This chapter describes CSR as an essential manifestation of mindful leadership and of moral sensitivity. Mindfulness is a critical skill for any leader, in any setting, because it has a major influence on the type of decisions this leader will make. As a core element of mindfulness, this chapter also discusses respect, as this presents itself through the way we treat people and other living beings. The chapter then explains the importance of ethics in business performance, and links this to CSR. It also mentions ISO 26000 as a crucial morally responsible effort in business ethics. In order to bring the message on CSR home, the chapter further elaborates on the concept of stakeholders, clarifying the breadth of consideration needed in considering this concept. As an illustration of the interrelatedness between mindful leadership, moral behavior, and CSR, the chapter presents the case of Interface and its founding CEO, Ray Anderson.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. (2007). Doing well by doing good. In D. Church (Ed.), Einstein’s business: Engaging soul, imagination, and excellence in the workplace. Santa Rosa, CA: Elite Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arikan, E., Kantur, D., Maden, C., & Telci, E. E. (2016). Investigating the mediating role of corporate reputation on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and multiple stakeholder outcomes. Quality and Quantity, 50(1), 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedek, A., Takács, I., & Takács-György, K. (2014). Examining corporate social responsibility from a stakeholder viewpoint based on an empirical research. Zarzadzanie Publiczne, 27, 309–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, S., & Langer, E. (2004). Mindful practice for clinicians and patients. In L. Haas (Ed.), Handbook of primary care psychology (pp. 173–186). London: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, S. H., & Langer, E. J. (2006). Mindfulness and self-acceptance. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 24(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2014, September 3). Radical industrialists: 20 Years later, Interface looks back on Ray Anderson’s legacy. Greenbiz.com. Retrieved February 15, 2016, from http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2014/09/03/20-years-later-interface-looks-back-ray-andersons-legacy

  • de Mascena, K., Cunha, M., Fischmann, A. A., & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2018). Stakeholder prioritization in brazilian companies disclosing GRI reports. Brazilian Business Review, 15(1), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditlev-Simonsen, C., & Wenstøp, F. (2013). How stakeholders view stakeholders as CSR motivators. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(1), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2001). Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility (Green Paper). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pittman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob, U., & Bartlett, J. (2007). Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R., & Kuhnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interface’s Ray Anderson receives honorary doctorate for sustainability initiatives. (2011, August 11). Professional Services Close – Up.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 26000: International Organization for Standardization. (2010). Guidance for social responsibility. Geneva: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (2005). Coming to our senses. New York, NY: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khong, B. (2011). Mindfulness: A way of cultivating deep respect for emotions. Mindfulness, 2(1), 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. (2011, August 10). Ray Anderson, ‘greenest CEO in America,’ dies at 77. The Washington Post Obituaries. Retrieved February 15, 2016, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/ray-anderson-greenest-ceo-in-america-dies-at-77/2011/08/10/gIQAGoTU7I_story.html

  • Marques, J. (2012a). A global SR standard: Good, or too good to be true? The Journal for Quality and Participation, 34(4), 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J. (2012b). Ethics: Walking the talk. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 35(2), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J. (2016). Leadership and mindfulness. In J. Marques & S. Dhiman (Eds.), Leadership today: Practices for personal and professional performance. New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, A., López, C., & García-De los Salmones, M. d. M. (2017). An empirical exploration of the link between reporting to corporate social responsibility reputation in the spanish context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(3), 668–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sones, M., Grantham, S., & Vieira, E. T. (2009). Communicating CSR via pharmaceutical company web sites: Evaluating message frameworks for external and internal stakeholders. Corporate Communications, 14(2), 144–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taghian, M., D’Souza, C., & Polonsky, M. (2015). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, reputation and business performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weismann, M. F. (2017). The missing metrics of sustainability: Just how beneficial are benefit corporations? Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 42(1), 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. W. (2009). Business ethics: A stakeholder & issues management approach (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizka, L. (2017). The (mis)use of social media to communicate CSR in hospitality. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 8(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Marques .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marques, J. (2020). Making and Keeping Stakeholders Mindful of CSR. In: Marques, J., Dhiman, S. (eds) Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39676-3_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics