Abstract
Roman Ingarden is one of the most well known phenomenological ontologists. Yet his phenomenological ontology is very different from Heidegger’s. Ingarden rather follows Husserlian formal ontology and, in a wider perspective, post-Brentanian theories of the object. He held that one of the tasks of a proper theory of the object was to overcome the empiricist bundle theories. His mature neo-Aristotelian substantialism is a strong response to empiricism. Ingarden began working out his position very early on. In his phenomenological manifesto—The Aims of Phenomenologists—he sketched a theory of the object as an alternative to the simple bundle theory of Ernst Mach and his followers. This early doctrine is the topic of the current chapter. I present this theory, classify it in contemporary terms and compare it to his mature substantialism. My thesis is that Ingarden’s early view is a sort of sophisticated bundle theory or a sui generis doctrine which should be placed somewhere between sophisticated bundle theories and full-blooded substantialism. In The Aims the basic structure of a thing is a Gestalt-qualities structure, differing in many respects from a subject-properties structure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
See his letter of 28th March 1922 to Twardowski (Ingarden and Twardowski 2016, pp. 207–212).
- 3.
Ingarden thought there are possible Gestalts grounded in mutually dependent qualities.
- 4.
- 5.
References
Chrudzimski, Arkadiusz. 1999. Die Erkenntnistheorie von Roman Ingarden. Dordrecht: Springer.
———, ed. 2005. Existence, culture, and persons. The ontology of Roman Ingarden. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
Ingarden, Roman. 1919a. Dążenia fenomenologów. Przegląd Filozoficzny 22: 118–156.
———. 1919b. Dążenia fenomenologów. Dokończenie. Przegląd Filozoficzny 22: 315–351.
———. 1922. Intuition und Intellekt bei Henri Bergson. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 5: 285–461.
———. 1925. Essentiale Fragen. Ein Beitrag zum Wessensproblem. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 7: 125–304.
———. 1929. Bemerkungen zum Problem Idealismus-Realismus. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 11: 159–190.
———. 1931a. Das literarische Kunstwerk. Eine Untersuchung aus dem Grenzgebiet der Ontologie, Logik und Literaturwissenschaft. Halle: Niemeyer.
———. 1931b. Niektóre założenia idealizmu Berkeleya. In Księga Pamiątkowa Polskiego Towarzystwa Filozoficznego, 215–258. Lvov: Polskie Towarzystwo Filozoficzne.
———. 1935. Vom formalen Aufbau des individuellen Gegenstandes. Studia Philosophica 1: 29–106.
———. 1946. Esencjalne zagadnienie formy i jej podstawowe pojęcia. Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 1946: 101–164.
———. 1963. Dążenia fenomenologów. In Z badań nad filozofią współczesną, ed. Roman Ingarden, 269–379. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
———. 1972. O pytaniach esencjalnych. In Z teorii języka i filozoficznych podstaw logiki, ed. Roman Ingarden, 327–507. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
———. 1976. The letter to Husserl about the VI. [Logical] Investigation and “idealism.” Analecta Husserliana 4: 419–438.
———. 1999. Dzieje mojej “kariery uniwersyteckiej.” Kwartalnik Filozoficzny 27: 183–201.
———. 2013. Controversy over the existence of the world, vol. I. Trans. Arthur Szylewicz. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
———. 2016. Controversy over the existence of the world, vol. II. Trans. Arthur Szylewicz. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Ingarden, Roman, and Kazimierz Twardowski. 2016. Korespondencja Romana Witolda Ingardena z Kazimierzem Twardowskim. Kęty: Wydawnictwo Marek Derewiecki.
Loux, Michael J. 2006. Metaphysics. A contemporary introduction. London/New York: Routledge.
Macdonald, Cynthia. 2005. Varieties of things. Foundations of contemporary metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Malherbe, Olivier, and Sébastien Richard. 2016. Forme(s) et modes d'etre: L’ontologie de Roman Ingarden/Form(s) and Modes of Being: The ontology of Roman Ingarden. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.
Mitscherling, Jeff. 1997. Roman Ingarden’s ontology and aesthetics. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Płotka, Witold. 2017. Early phenomenology in Poland (1895–1945): Origins, development, and breakdown. Studies in East European Thought 69 (1): 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-017-9274-0.
Simons, Peter. 1994. Particulars in particular clothings: Three trope theories. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 553–575.
———. 2005. The ties that bind: What holds individuals together? In Substanz. Neue Überlegungen zu einer klassischen Kategorie des Seienden, ed. Kathe Trettin, 229–243. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.
Thomasson, Amie. 2017. Roman Ingarden. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/ingarden/.
Acknowledgments
The project is financed by the National Science Centre, Poland (no. 2017/27/B/HS1/02455).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Piwowarczyk, M. (2020). Roman Ingarden’s Early Theory of the Object. In: Płotka, W., Eldridge, P. (eds) Early Phenomenology in Central and Eastern Europe. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 113. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39623-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39623-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39622-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39623-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)