Skip to main content

Using Theatrical Traditions to Teach Empathy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pedagogy, Empathy and Praxis
  • 777 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers traditions in the theatre as the basis for learning that transforms dimensions of teacher training including specific training in empathy. The affect and effect of the arts and creativity on pedagogy has garnered renewed scrutiny (Anderson, The Challenge of Post-Normality to Drama Education and Applied Theatre. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 19(1), 110–120, 2014) as the nature of schooling and work changes and societally we continue to grapple with concerns about the global economy, health, environment and social challenges. Critiquing theatrical traditions to activate methods to teach with, for and about empathy is the line of inquiry in this chapter. Experiencing through an artistic medium such as theatre allows us an experience that might engrave a lesson on our heart. Speculation, by contrast, leaves us untouched and disengaged from the reality of other people according to the British playwright, Sarah Kane (1971–1999).

By exploring the traditions of the theatre, specifically Stanislavski’s method acting (An Actor Prepares. New York: Theater Arts Books, 1936), process drama (Bowell & Heap, Planning Process Drama, Enriching Teaching and Learning (2nd ed.). Abingdon, England: Routledge, 1995) and drama-rich pedagogies (Ewing, Drama-Rich Pedagogy and Becoming Deeply Literate: Drama Australia Monograph No. Twelve. Brisbane: Drama Australia, 2019), teachers in training can enhance their understanding of the diverse social and cultural needs of the students in their care. Pedagogy and praxis that is firmly situated in enactment and uses the imagination as a generative tool can facilitate an understanding of multiple perspectives by ‘walking in someone else’s shoes’ (Ewing & Simons, 2004). The term process drama refers to a participatory and engaging form of theatre tailored to the task of teaching and learning, where a factual pre-text from any discipline area or domain can be used to imagine real events. In a process drama the participants assume different roles and undertake aesthetic and creative opportunities through highly structured dramatic activities. Fiorella and Mayer (2015) argue that when students receive the appropriate guidance, the act of imagining can be a powerful pedagogical tool. Key to this model is the active co-construction of meaning by teachers and students and its transformation into relevant and consequential knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, R. (2005). Empathic Intelligence: Teaching, Learning, Relating. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boler, M. (1999). Feeling Power: Emotions and Education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R. (2019a). Drama-Rich Pedagogy and Becoming Deeply Literate: Drama Australia Monograph No. Twelve. Brisbane: Drama Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R. (2019b). Embedding Arts-Rich English and Literacy Pedagogies in the Classroom. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 27(1), 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., & Saunders, J. N. (2016). The School Drama, Literature & Literacy in the Creative Classroom. Sydney: Currency Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, R., & Simons, J. (2004). Beyond the Script. Drama in the Classroom, Take, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). Learning as a Generative Activity. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970 [2007]). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., & Ewing, R. (2019, January 23). Another 4C’s: Curiosity, Compassion, Connection and Courage. Paper Presented at National Art Education Conference, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the Imagination: Essays on Education, the Arts and Social Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrath, S., O’Brien, E., & Hsing, C. (2011). Changes in Dispositional Empathy in American College Students Over Time: A Meta-Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2), 180–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2001). Legitimate Peripheral Participation in Communities of Practice. In Supporting Lifelong Learning (pp. 121–136). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., & Saxton, J. (2005). Drama: Alive and Well. A Pedagogy of Practice, of Research and of Teacher Education. Paper Presented at Canadian Teacher Education Conference, Calgary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C., & Saxton. (2016). Into the Story 2: More Stories, More Drama. Bristol, UK: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics & Moral Education. University of California Press: Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Poetic Justice: The Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Grady, A., & Smyth, C. (2017). Finding Neverland: The Affordances of Play for Teachers’ Knowledge Work. In P. O’Connor & C. R. Gomez (Eds.), Playing with Possibilities (pp. 156–170). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J. (2015, Unpublished Masters Research). School Drama: A Case Study of Student Academic and Non-Academic Achievement. Sydney: University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, J., Miller, C., Laidlaw, L., & O’Mara, J. (2018). Asking Better Questions—Teaching and Learning for a Changing World (3rd ed.). Pembroke Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanislavski, C. (1949). Building a Character. Theater Arts Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. (1964). On the Problem of Empathy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. (1998). Redcoats and Patriots: Reflective Practice in Drama and Social Studies. Dimensions of Drama Series. Heinemann, 361 Hanover Street, Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912. Retrieved from http://www.heinemann.com

  • Taylor, P. (2004). The Drama Classroom: Action, Reflection, Transformation. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verducci, S. (2000). A Moral Method? Thoughts on Cultivating Empathy through Method Acting. Journal of Moral Education, 29(1), 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamir, T. (2010). Watching Actors. Theatre Journal, 62(2), 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Grove O’Grady .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grove O’Grady, A. (2020). Using Theatrical Traditions to Teach Empathy. In: Pedagogy, Empathy and Praxis. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39526-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39526-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39525-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39526-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics