Skip to main content

The Assessment Landscape in the United States: From Then to the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Monitoring Student Achievement in the 21st Century

Abstract

What is the state of assessment in the United States? The answer, as always, depends upon test purposes, specifically who is being tested. The goal of this chapter is to substantially review this question principally for accountability purposes in the pre-collegiate (excluding early childhood) educational level as well as a brief discussion of workforce contexts. In this chapter, we will focus on external rather than teacher-made examinations, and where relevant, we reference pertinent federal policy changes governing or influencing widespread assessment practices. Because of space limitations, we emphasize pre-collegiate assessment. Part of our discussion addresses societal influences and, in particular, new technologies and their benefits. Based on our current work on assessments in technical domains, we will highlight important practices and close with summary thoughts about trends influencing assessment. We will use the terms test, assessment, and exam relatively interchangeably. Throughout the chapter as important subtext, we reflect on the level of evidence routinely provided about examination quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. L. (2005). Aligning curriculum, standards, and assessments: Fulfilling the promise of school reform. In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), Measurement and research in the accountability era (pp. 315–335). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. L. (2012). Standards for educational and psychological testing. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity in education (Vol. 4, pp. 2076–2081). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. L. (2015, May). Feature analysis: Improving the validity of competency tests. Presentation at the colloquium on assessment and accountability implications of competency and personalized learning systems. Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E., & Cai, L. (2014, August). CRESST analysis of the quality of a state assessment (Technical slide report). Los Angeles: CRESST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. L., & Choi, K. C. (2018). Training Assessment Framework (Report to funder). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, National Center on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, D., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L., Ravitch, D., Rothstein, R., Shavelson, R. J., & Shepard, L. A. (2010, August). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers (Briefing Paper #278). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. Available at http://epi.3cdn.net/724cd9a1eb91c40ff0_hwm6iij90.pdf

  • Baker, E. L., Chung, G., & Cai, L. (2016). Assessment gaze, refraction, and blur: The course of achievement testing in the last hundred years. Review of Research in Education (Centennial Issue), 40, 94–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewley, W. L., Chung, G. K. W. K., Delacruz, G. C., & Baker, E. L. (2009). Assessment models and tools for virtual environment training. In D. Schmorrow, J. Cohn, & D. Nicholson (Eds.), The PSI handbook of virtual environments for training and education: Developments for the military and beyond (pp. 300–313). Westport: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, J. (2003). The e-rater scoring engine: Automated essay scoring with natural language processing. In M. D. Shermis & J. C. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross disciplinary approach (pp. 113–121). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Oxford: U.S. Department of Health, Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 as amended, 20 U.S.C. §241 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gareis, C. R. (2017). Assessment leadership: Leveraging performance-based assessments for deeper learning. Presented at the 21st Annual School-University Research Network Leadership Conference at the College of William & Mary, Williamsburg VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 108, Stat. 3518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaschik, S. (2016, March). The shrinking humanities major. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/03/14/study-shows-87-decline-humanities-bachelors-degrees-2-years

  • Madni, A., Kao, J. C., Rivera, N. M., Baker, E. L., & Cai, L. (2018). Exploring career-readiness features in high school test items through cognitive laboratory interviews (CRESST Report 857). Los Angeles: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE). (2014). NACE 2013–2014 career services benchmark survey for colleges and universities. Bethlehem: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). Nation at risk. Washington, DC: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Education Standards and Testing. (1992, January 24). Raising standards for American education: A report to Congress, the Secretary of Education, the National Education Goals Panel, and the American People. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Education Goals Panel. (1999). The national education goals report: Building a nation of learners, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, §115, Stat. 1425 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, H. F., & Chung, G. K. W. K. (2011, April). Use of knowledge mapping in computer-based assessment. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, H. F., Perez, R. S., & Baker, E. L. (Eds.). (2014). Teaching and measuring cognitive readiness. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva L. Baker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baker, E.L., O’Neil, H.F. (2020). The Assessment Landscape in the United States: From Then to the Future. In: Harju-Luukkainen, H., McElvany, N., Stang, J. (eds) Monitoring Student Achievement in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38969-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38969-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38968-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38969-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics