Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impacts of Consumption and the Role of Business

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability

  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

Dominant unsustainable consumption patterns in developed countries have led to increasing climate and biodiversity issues. Through consumption-based accounting, at least 70% of the environmental footprint (carbon emissions, blue water extraction, resource use, and land use) can be attributed to food, housing, the use of appliances, and transport. Total consumption of dominant consumer goods such as clothing and electronics is only on the rise, also leading to increasing levels of waste. Given these adverse trends, and the key role of business in society, this chapter focuses on a potential positive role by business and investigates the following question: Can business have a positive role in supporting or even driving sustainable consumption, and if so, how? First, a Business for Sufficiency framework is introduced – based on the top strategies in the waste hierarchy and the four “lessens” – to map possible business-driven strategies. Second, this framework is applied to the sectors of food, housing, appliances, and transport. Based on this analysis, it was found that business indeed has a plethora of options, including green alternatives, service-driven business models, platforms, and strategies to moderate consumption. However, green alternatives were most prevalent. While some businesses also operate in the refuse (do not overconsume) option, it is likely that new policies are needed to drive sustainable consumption. The EU Circular Economy Package is an important lever for policy change, but a specific focus on sufficiency may help guide even more stringent policies to curb unsustainable consumption patterns that are detrimental to the environment and ultimately society itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander S (2012) The sufficiency economy. Retrieved from http://simplicityinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/TheSufficiencyEconomy3.pdf

  • Bocken N (2017) Business-led sustainable consumption initiatives: impacts and lessons learned. J Manag Dev 36(1):81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken NM, Short SW (2016) Towards a sufficiency-driven business model: experiences and opportunities. Environ Innov Soc Trans 18:41–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken NM, Short SW (2021) Unsustainable business models – recognising and resolving institutionalised social and environmental harm. J Clean Prod 312:127828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken NM, De Pauw I, Bakker C, Van Der Grinten B (2016) Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J Ind Prod Eng 33(5):308–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocken N, Mugge R, Bom CA, Lemstra H-J (2018) Pay-per-use business models as a driver for sustainable consumption: evidence from the case of HOMIE. J Clean Prod 198:498–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken N, Morales LS, Lehner M (2020) Sufficiency business strategies in the food industry – the case of Oatly. Sustainability 12(3):824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Circular X (2020) Case study: Fairphone – modular, long-life smartphones. https://www.circularx.eu/en/cases/36/fairphone-modular-long-life-smartphones. Accessed 9 July 2021

  • Cohen MJ (2021) New conceptions of sufficient home size in high-income countries: are we approaching a sustainable consumption transition? Hous Theory Soc 38(2):173–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis SK, Mont O (2020) Sharing economy business models for sustainability. J Clean Prod 266:121519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauvergne P (2008) The shadows of consumption – consequences for the global environment. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis SJ, Caldeira K (2010) Consumption based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(12):5687–5692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman A, Gatersleben B (2019) A time-use approach: high subjective wellbeing, low carbon leisure. J Public Ment Health 18(2):85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enerdata (2019) The future of air-conditioning. https://www.enerdata.net/publications/executive-briefing/the-future-air-conditioning-global-demand.html. Accessed 13 July 2021

  • European Environmental Agency (2021) Rail and waterborne – best for low-carbon motorised transport. Briefing no. 01/2021. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/rail-and-waterborne-transport. Accessed 31 Mar 2021

  • European Union (2020) Circular Economy Action Plan. For a cleaner and more competitive Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/pdf/circular-economy/new_circular_economy_action_plan.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2021

  • FAO (2011) Global food losses and food waste. Extent causes and prevention. http://www.fao.org/3/mb060e/mb060e00.htm. Accessed 9 July 2021

  • Freudenreich B, Schaltegger S (2020) Developing sufficiency-oriented offerings for clothing users: business approaches to support consumption reduction. J Clean Prod 247:119589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frick V, Gossen M, Santarius T, Geiger S (2021) When your shop says #lessismore. Online communication interventions for clothing sufficiency. J Environ Psychol 75:101595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego B, Lenzen M (2005) A consistent input−output formulation of shared producer and consumer responsibility. Econ Syst Res 17(4):365–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haucke FV (2018) Smartphone-enabled social change: evidence from the Fairphone case? J Clean Prod 197:1719–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry M, Schraven D, Bocken N, Frenken K, Hekkert M, Kirchherr J (2021) The battle of the buzzwords: a comparative review of the circular economy and the sharing economy concepts. Environ Innov Soc Trans 38:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich EG, van der Voet E, Suh S et al (2010) Assessing the environmental impacts of consumption and production: priority products and materials. UNEP, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • IRP (2019) Global Resources Outlook 2019: natural resources for the future we want. https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/global-resources-outlook. Accessed 1 Apr 2019

  • Ivanova D, Stadler K, Steen-Olsen K, Wood R, Vita G, Tukker A, Hertwich EG (2016) Environmental impact assessment of household consumption. J Ind Ecol 20(3):526–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova D, Vita G, Steen-Olsen K, Stadler K, Melo PC, Wood R, Hertwich EG (2017) Mapping the carbon footprint of EU regions. Environ Res Lett 12(5):054013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson T (2009) Prosperity without growth: economics for a finite planet. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones N (2018) How to stop data centres from gobbling up the world’s electricity. Nature News Feature, 12 September 2018. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06610-y. Accessed 13 July 2021

  • Kander A, Jiborn M, Moran DD, Wiedmann TO (2015) National greenhouse-gas accounting for effective climate policy on international trade. Nat Clim Chang 5(5):431–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanyama J, Benders R (2021) Shifting expenditure on food, holidays, and furnishings could lower greenhouse gas emissions by almost 40%. J Ind Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13176

  • Lansink A (1979) Tweede Kamer, 1979–1980, Rijksbegroting voor het jaar 1980, Hoofdstuk XVII, 15800, nr. 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen M, Murray J (2010) Conceptualising environmental responsibility. Ecol Econ 70:261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang S, Qu S, Zhu Z, Guan D, Xu M (2017) Income-based greenhouse gas emissions of nations. Environ Sci Technol 51:346–355. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marques A, Rodrigues J, Lenzen M, Domingos T (2012) Income-based environmental responsibility. Ecol Econ 84:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFall-Johnsen M (2021) The fashion industry emits more carbon than international flights and maritime shipping combined. Here are the biggest ways it impacts the planet. Business Insider, 21 Oct 2019. https://www.businessinsider.com/fast-fashion-environmental-impact-pollution-emissions-waste-water-2019-10?r=US&IR=T. Accessed 9 July 2020

  • Niessen L, Bocken N (2021a) Business action for sufficiency – towards viable business strategies. Product Lifetimes and the Environment (PLATE), Halmstadt

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niessen L, Bocken N (2021b) How can businesses drive sufficiency? The business for sufficiency framework. Sustain Prod Consum 28:1090–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill DW, Fanning AL, Lamb WF, Steinberger JK (2018) A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nat Sustain 1(2):88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papargyropoulou E, Lozano R, Steinberger JK, Wright N, bin Ujang, Z. (2014) The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. J Clean Prod 76:106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira Heath MT, Chatzidakis A (2012) “Blame it on marketing”: consumers’ views on unsustainable consumption. Int J Consum Stud 36(6):656–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinero P, Bruckner M, Wieland HP, Pongracz E, Giljum S (2018) The raw material basis of global value chains: allocating environmental responsibility based on value generation. Econ Syst Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2018.1536038

  • Prendeville S, Cherim E, Bocken N (2018) Circular cities: mapping six cities in transition. Environ Innov Soc Trans 26:171–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke J, Donaghey J, Bocken N, Lauriano L (2019) Business model and labour standards: making the connection. Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder G, Houlin Z (2019) The world’s e-waste is a huge problem. It’s also a golden opportunity. World Economic Forum, 24 January 2019. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/how-a-circular-approach-can-turn-e-waste-into-a-golden-opportunity/. Accessed 13 July 2021

  • Sachs W (1993) Die vier E’s. Merkposten für einen massvollen Lebensstil. Polit Ökol 33:69–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg M (2018) Downsizing of housing. J Macromark 38(2):154–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146717748355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg M (2021) Sufficiency transitions: a review of consumption changes for environmental sustainability. J Clean Prod 293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126097

  • Scherer L, de Koning A, Tukker A (2019) BRIC and MINT countries’ environmental impacts rising despite alleviative consumption patterns. Sci Total Environ 665:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit J (2019) Het grote gevecht: & het eenzame gelijk van Paul Polman. Prometheus, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahel W (1994) The utilization-focused service economy: resource efficiency and product-life extension. In: The greening of industrial ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington. DC, pp 178–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Jansen B (2006) Environmental impacts of products: a detailed review of studies. J Ind Ecol 10(3):159–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Cohen MJ, Hubacek K, Mont O (2010) The impacts of household consumption and options for change. J Ind Ecol 14(1):13–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Bulavskaya T, Giljum S, de Koning A, Lutter S, Simas M, Stadler K, Wood R (2016) Environmental and resource footprints in a global context: Europe’s structural deficit in resource endowments. Glob Environ Chang 40:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Pollitt H, Henkemans M (2020) Consumption based carbon accounting: sense and sensibility. Clim Pol 20(Supp 1):S1–S13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1728208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunn VSC, Bocken NMP, van den Hende EA, Schoormans JPL (2019) Business models for sustainable consumption in the circular economy: an expert study. J Clean Prod 212:324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon LJ, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera JA, Vries DW, Majele Sibanda L, … Murray CJL (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet, 393(10170):447–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood R, Moran D, Stadler K, Ivanova D, Steen-Olsen K, Tisserant A, Hertwich EG (2018) Prioritizing consumption-based carbon policy based on the evaluation of mitigation potential using input–output methods. J Ind Ecol 22(3):540–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynes S, Nicholas KA (2017) The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environ Res Lett 12(7):074024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocken NM, Short SW (2020) Transforming business models: towards a sufficiency-based circular economy. In Handbook of the Circular Economy. Edward Elgar Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Creutzig F, Roy J, Lamb WF, Azevedo IM, De Bruin WB, Dalkmann H, Edelenbosch OY, Geels FW, Grubler A, Hepburn C Hertwich EG (2018) Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change 8(4):260–263

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Nancy Bocken and Laura Niessen were funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020s European Research Council (ERC) funding scheme [grant agreement no. 850159], as part of project Circular X (www.circularx.eu).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Economics, Maastricht Sustainability Institute (MSI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    N. Bocken & L. Niessen

  2. Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

    A. Tukker

  3. Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), The Hague, The Netherlands

    A. Tukker

Authors
  1. N. Bocken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Niessen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Tukker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Bocken .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bocken, N., Niessen, L., Tukker, A. (2022). Impacts of Consumption and the Role of Business. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_136-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_136-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38948-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38948-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation