Abstract
This volume presents our analysis of five elementary mathematics curriculum programs from three perspectives that have implications for teachers’ use of them: mathematical emphasis, pedagogical approaches, and how authors communicate with teachers. In this chapter, we offer perspectives on these design features from the vantage point of three teams of curriculum authors. Drawing on extensive conversations with the author teams, we describe their reflections on several major design decisions, including mathematical goals and sequencing, pedagogical approach, and communicating intentions to teachers. Our aim is to highlight the relationship between curriculum authors’ intention, their subsequent design decisions, and the resulting curriculum resource. By using the curriculum authors’ voices, we attempt to highlight their intentions, positions, and reflections. We also describe the ongoing process of curriculum development and the evolving nature of curriculum, along with challenges the curriculum authors faced. In doing so, we seek to juxtapose our analysis of the designed curriculum materials with the authors’ intentions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We made efforts to contact all curriculum authors, but our requests were not returned from the authors of Math in Focus (MIF) and Scott Foresman–Addison Wesley Mathematics (SFAW).
References
Charles, R. I., Crown, W., Fennell, F., et al. (2008). Scott Foresman–Addison Wesley Mathematics. Glenview, IL: Pearson.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Marulis, L. M., & Iwashyna, A. K. (2014). Designing educative curriculum materials: A theoretically and empirically driven process. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 24–52.
Marshall Cavendish International. (2010). Math in focus: The Singapore approach by Marshall Cavendish. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2004). The math wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 253–286.
Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Standards based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
TERC. (2008). Investigations in Number, Data, and Space (2nd edition). Glenview, IL: Pearson Education Inc.
TERC. (2008a). Investigations in number, data, and space: Implementing investigations in grade 3 (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Pearson Education.
TERC. (2008b). Investigations in number, data, and space: Implementing investigations in grade 4 (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Pearson Education.
TERC. (2008c). Investigations in number, data, and space: Implementing investigations in grade 5 (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Pearson Education.
TIMS Project (2008). Math Trailblazers (3rd Edition). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
TIMS Project. (2008a). Math trailblazers teacher implementation guide grade 3. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
TIMS Project. (2008b). Math trailblazers teacher implementation guide grade 4. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
TIMS Project. (2008c). Math trailblazers teacher implementation guide grade 5. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. (2008). Everyday Mathematics (3rd Edition). Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill.
University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. (2008a). Third grade everyday mathematics assessment handbook. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill.
University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. (2008b). Fourth grade everyday mathematics assessment handbook. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill.
University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. (2008c). Fifth grade everyday mathematics assessment handbook. Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, OK., Remillard, J.T. (2020). Authors Retrospective Reflections on Designing Opportunities for Student Learning. In: Elementary Mathematics Curriculum Materials. Research in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38588-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38588-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38587-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38588-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)