Abstract
This chapter describes the philosophy and approach of Reginald Revans (1907–2003), a UK scientist and educational innovator. It traces the influences on his thinking, from his early imbibing of Christian and Quaker traditions to the later impact of world philosophies especially including Buddhism. His contribution to our understanding of change management processes gives a central place to learning, both personal and institutional. Revans’ approach emphasizes the practical and moral significance of personal involvement in action and learning, as a means of resolving the intractable social and organizational problems that we find around us. Over a long life, Revans was ceaselessly active in testing his ideas which were always in a state of emergence. He leaves a rich heritage of proposals and possibilities for present practitioners. Five of the legacies of his work are discussed in this paper: Virtual Action Learning, Critical Action Learning, The Wicked Problems of Leadership, Unlearning, and the Paradox of Innovation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2010). Managing innovation paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Planning, 43(1), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.08.003.
Antonacopolou, E. P. (2009). Impact and scholarship: Unlearning and practicing to co-create actionable knowledge. Management Learning, 40(4), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609336708.
Attwood, M. (2007). Challenging from the margins into the mainstream: Improving renal services in a collaborative and entrepreneurial spirit. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 4(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767330701592904.
BIS. (2014). Annual report on innovation (p. 3). UK Department of Business, Innovation & Skills
Boshyk, Y., & Dilworth, L. (2010). Action learning: History and evolution. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250734
Bourner, T. (2011). Self-managed action learning. In M. Pedler (Ed.), Action learning in practice (4th ed., pp. 113–123). Gower.
Brook, C., Pedler, M., Abbott, C., & Burgoyne, J. (2016). On stopping doing those things that are not getting us to where we want to be: Unlearning, wicked problems and critical action learning. Human Relations, 69(2), 369–389. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0018726715586243
Burgoyne, J. (1994). Managing by learning. Management Learning, 25(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507694251003.
Casey, D., & Pearce, D. (Eds.). (1977). More than management development: Action learning at GEC. Gower Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429452567.
Caulat, G. (2012a). Virtual leadership: Learning to lead differently. Libri.
Caulat, G. (2012b). Virtual action learning: A new genre for powerful learning. In S. Voller, E. Blass, & V. Culpin (Eds.), The future of learning: Insights and innovations from executive development (pp. 72–87). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306356_7
Clark, P. A. (1972). Action research & organisational change. Harper & Row.
Conger, J., & Toegel, G. (2002). Action learning and multi-rater feedback as leadership development interventions: Popular but poorly deployed. Journal of Change Management, 3(4), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/714023841.
Dickenson, M., Burgoyne, J., & Pedler, M. (2010). Virtual action learning: Practices and challenges. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 7(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767330903576978.
Dixon, N. (1997). More than just a task force. In M. Pedler (Ed.), Action learning in practice (3rd ed., pp. 329–338). Gower Press.
Dotlich, D., & Noel, J. (1998). Action learning: How the world’s top companies are re-creating their leaders and themselves. Jossey-Bass.
Dovey, K., & Rembach, M. (2015). Invisible practices, innovative outcomes: Intrapreneurship within the academy. Action Learning: Research & Practice, 12(3), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2015.1074885.
Grint, K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of ‘leadership’. Human Relations, 58(11), 1467–1494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705061314.
Grint, K. (2008). Leadership, management and command – Rethinking D-day. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230590502.
Hsu, S.-W. (2013). Alternative learning organization. In A. Örtenblad (Ed.), Handbook of research on the learning organization: Adaptation and context (pp. 358–371). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781004906.0003.
Kalling, T. (2007). The lure of simplicity: Learning perspectives on innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710720555.
Kuhn, J., & Marsick, V. (2005). Action learning for strategic innovation in mature organizations: Key cognitive, design and contextual considerations. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 2(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767330500041236.
Leonard, S., & Marquardt, M. (2010). The evidence for the effectiveness of action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 7(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2010.488323.
Marquardt, M. (2004). Optimizing the power of action learning. Davies-Black.
Mclaughlin, H., & Thorpe, R. (1993). Action learning – A paradigm in emergence: The problems facing a challenge in traditional management education and development. British Journal of Management, 4(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1993.tb00158.x.
Meyerson, D. (2003). Tempered radicals: How everyday leaders inspire change at work. Harvard Business School Press.
Olssen, A., Wadell, C., Odenrick, P., & Norell Bergendahl, M. (2010). An action learning method for increasing innovation capability in organisations. Action Learning: Research & Practice, 7(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2010.488328.
Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J. G., & Brook, C. (2005). What has action learning learned to become? Action Learning: Research & Practice, 2(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767330500041251.
Raelin, J. (1999). Preface to a special issue “The Action Dimension in Management”: Diverse approaches to research, teaching and development. Management Learning, 30(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507699302001.
Raelin, J. (2008). Emancipatory discourse and liberation. Management Learning, 39(5), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507608096039.
Revans, R. (2011). ABC of action learning. Gower. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315263533.
Revans, R. W. (1971). Developing effective managers. Praeger.
Revans, R. W. (1980). Action learning: New techniques for managers. Blond & Briggs.
Revans, R. W. (1982). The origins & growth of action learning. Charwell Bratt.
Reynolds, M. (2011). Reflective practice: Origins and interpretations. Action Learning: Research & Practice, 8(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2011.549321.
Reynolds, M., & Vince, R. (Eds.). (2004). Organizing reflection. Ashgate/Gower. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315247502.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.
Stiglitz, J., & Greenwald, B. (2014). Creating a learning society: A new approach to growth, development, and social progress. Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.7312/stig15214.
Vince, R. (2001). Power and emotions in organizational learning. Human Relations, 54(10), 1325–1351. https://doi.org/10.1177/a019197.
Vince, R. (2004). Action learning and organizational learning: Power, politics, and emotion in organizations. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1476733042000187628.
Vince, R. (2008). ‘Learning-in-action’ and ‘learning inaction’: Advancing the theory and practice of critical action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 5(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767330802185582.
Vince, R., Abbey, G. Bell, D., & Langenhan, M. (2016) Finding critical action learning through paradox: The role of action learning in the suppression and stimulation of critical reflection (Working Paper). University of Bath.
Wieland, G. F. (1981). Improving health care management. Health Administration Press.
Wieland, G. F., & Leigh, H. (Eds.). (1971). Changing hospitals: A report on the hospital internal communications project. Tavistock.
Willis, V. (2004). Inspecting cases: Prevailing degrees of action learning using Revans’ theory and rules of engagement as standard. Action Learning: Research & Practice, 1(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1476733042000187592.
Wilmott, H. (1994). Management education: Provocations to a debate. Management Learning, 25(1), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507694251008.
Wilmott, H. (1997). Critical management learning. In J. Burgoyne & M. Reynolds (Eds.), Management learning: Integrating perspectives in theory & practice (pp. 161–176). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250488.n10.
Wyton, & Payne. (2014). Exploring the development of competence in Lean management through action learning groups: A study of the introduction of Lean to a facilities management function. Action Learning: Research & Practice, 11(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2013.873015.
Further Reading
Heifetz, R. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Pedler, M. (2021). Revans, Reginald: The Pioneer of Action Learning. In: Szabla, D.B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38324-4_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38324-4_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38323-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38324-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences