Skip to main content

Don’t Block the Path of Inquiry”: Imagination, Inquiry, and Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Theory of Imagining, Knowing, and Understanding

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSTHEORET))

Abstract

This chapter builds on the book topic using Peirce’s semiotic theory. It illustrates how perception integrates semiosis and, therefore, is abductive because it can be corrected and, consequently, criticized. For this reason, the path of investigation is not lived only by the science of the laboratory, but also by all those who experience the continuum of time, space, language, and limits of life extension.

A concept is a symbol present to the imagination, — that is, more correctly speaking, of which a particular instance might be present to the imagination.

Charles S. Peirce, The Basis of Pragmaticism in the Normative Sciences, Peirce 1906, p. 387

The authors of this essay were benefited from financial support from CAPES-PRINT-UFBA. Waldomiro Silva Filho also received support from the CNPq Research Productivity Grant (Proc. n. 312111/2016-9). Some points presented here were first developed in M. V. Dazzani (Dazzani 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almeder, R. (1980). The philosophy of Charles S. Peirce: A critical introduction. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiasson, P. (2001). Peirce’s pragmatism: The design for thinking. Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dazzani, M. V. (2004). Pragmatismo e Aprendizagem: Uma abordagem semiótica. Salvador, Brazil: Tese de Doutorado. Programa de Pós-graduação de Educação – UFBA. 246pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, C. (1992). Peirce. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneller, J. (2007). Kant and the power of imagination. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, F. (1997). Peirce, signs, and meaning. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, F. (2004). Abdução: Uma razão sem lógica? In ROUANET, Luiz P. e SILVA FILHO, Waldomiro J. (Org.). Razão mínima. Unimarco: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misak, C. J. (1991). Truth and the end of inquiry: A peircean account of truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1868). Some consequences of four incapacities. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 1 (1867–1893) (pp. 28–55). Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1872-73). Toward a logic book. In C. S. Peirce (Ed.), Writings of Charles Sanders Peirce: A Chronological Edition (Vol. 3, pp. 14–108). Indianapolis, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1877). The fixation of belief. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 1 (1867–1893) (pp. 109–123). Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1878). Deduction, induction and abduction the law of mind. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 1 (1867-1893) (pp. 186–199). Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1892). The law of mind. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 1 (1867-1893) (pp. 312–333). Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1893). Immortality in the light of synechism. In The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 2 (1893-1913).. Peirce Edition Project (pp. 1–3). Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1898). The first rule of logic. In The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 2 (1893-1913).. Peirce Edition Project (pp. 42–56). Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1903). Pragmatism as a principle method of right thinking. In P. Turissi (Ed.), The 1903 Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1906). The basis of pragmatism in the normative sciences. In The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 2 (1893-1913).. Peirce Edition Project (pp. 371–397). Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1931-5). In C. Harstshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles S. Peirce (Vol. 1-6). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1958). In A. W. Burks (Ed.), Collected papers of Charles S. Peirce (Vol. 7-8). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 2 (1893-1913).. Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition. Peirce Edition Project. Indianapolis, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Vol 1 (1857-1866), 1982; Vol. 2 (1867-1871), 1984; Vol. 3 (1872-1878), 1986; Vol. 4 (1879-1884), 1989; Vol. 5 (1884-1886), 1993; Vol. 6 (1886-1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tateo, L. (2016). What imagination can teach us about higher mental functions. In J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, N. Chaudhary, T. Sato, & V. Dazzani (Eds.), Psychology as the science of human being: The Yokohama Manifesto (pp. 149–164). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Virginia Dazzani .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dazzani, M.V., Filho, W.S. (2020). “Don’t Block the Path of Inquiry”: Imagination, Inquiry, and Knowledge. In: A Theory of Imagining, Knowing, and Understanding. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38025-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics