Skip to main content

Games Within Games

The Two (or More) Fictional Levels of Video Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Videogame Sciences and Arts (VJ 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1164))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Video games that incorporate other games in their game-world create interlacing fictional levels. These can be used to engage with concepts of “gameness” from within the game itself without abandoning the aesthetic illusion created by the macrogame, in which the minigame is embedded. In my paper, I delve into the question why we are willing to immerse ourselves in video game worlds even if they contain elements that overtly emphasise the fictionality of these games. I explore concepts of illusion as well as interlacing fictional levels from a theoretical perspective before I research various modes of games within games with or without an impact on the gameplay of the macrogame as well as their relationship to illusion. The outcome of my paper will be a comprehensive study of the critical potential of minigames, which is accomplished by discussing a large corpus of different video games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the context of my paper, “we” is used to denote players of video games.

  2. 2.

    Following Grant Tavinor [1], narrative video games are regarded as fiction and defined as a work ‘in which the characters, places, events, objects, and actions referred to are fictional rather than real. A strong fictive thesis might claim that videogames are essentially fictions in that they necessarily depict fictional characters, places, objects, events, and actions’ [1]. The world created in (narrative) video games consequently differs from reality due to its status of being fictional, yet might be referred to by other terms than fiction, such as Roger Caillois’s description of them as ‘a second reality or […] a free unreality’ [2].

  3. 3.

    The defining characteristic of minigames is that they are embedded in another game, wherefore they differ from independent minigames as, for example, defined by Clark Aldrich [3].

  4. 4.

    My understanding of “gameness” is based on Sébastien Genvo’s argument that ‘gaming-oriented devices must convince the recipient of their playfulness through pragmatic markers that meet certain cultural representations of the activity and incite to consider this object as a game’ [4]. In other words, the game must contain elements that suggest to the player that it is a game. These characteristics are further defined and discussed by Genvo, particularly with regard to the concept of “ludic ethos”, which ‘invites us to understand how individuals are guided in their play activity by some “pragmatic markers”, and how structures build a universe of specific values to be accepted as a game’ [4].

  5. 5.

    Following Werner Wolf [5], illusion is not to be understood as a deceptive mode but as the aesthetic process of creating a world that differs from reality. While the immersion of the recipient in this illusion created by the medium is desired, an awareness of its difference from reality and, thus, a reflective, conscious, and critical stance counterbalances a potential delusion.

  6. 6.

    These five features are shared by play, games, sports, theatre, and rituals [7]. As Fernández-Vara notes, there are exceptions to this definition, such as, for example, online poker, which includes monetary gain and, hence, productivity.

  7. 7.

    The similarity between the real and the game-world depends on the game’s deviation from reality. Games can depart from reality to a large extent while they are still being perceived as believable; this, however, is only the case if they follow their own inner logic, regardless of how much they differ from reality.

  8. 8.

    Similar concepts are Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “willing suspension of disbelief” [9], Kendall L. Walton’s “make-believe” [10], Peter Lamarque’s “Thought Theory” [11], and, yet more extensive, Wayne C. Booth’s “fictional pact” [12]. These theories were developed to describe the relationship between a fictional text and the reader, yet for video games, the situation is entirely different, mainly due to the agency of the player in the creation of the story. In order to avoid terminological ambiguities, Wolf’s concepts of distance and participation are therefore more beneficial to a description of the potential interaction with illusion.

  9. 9.

    Although I focus on narrative video games, illusion is also possible in non-narrative games. In Tetris [16], for example, players are still willing to accept that the purpose of the world they enter is to put blocks of various shapes atop each other. However, no (complex) narrative is told.

  10. 10.

    Brian McHale describes narrative structures of ‘forking paths’ as ‘nesting or embedding, as in a set of Chinese boxes or Russian babushka dolls’ [18]. Wolf [5] also speaks of “Chinese-box structure”. This metaphor is adopted here since it depicts the relationship between the individual fictional levels and their interdependence.

  11. 11.

    These added levels can but need not be hypodiegetic. Games within games are hypodiegetic if they possess their own narrative elements, i.e. if they fulfill all elements of narrative as defined by Gerald Prince: ‘The representation (as product and process, object and act, structure and structuration) of one or more real or fictive events communicated by one, two, or several (more or less overt) narrators to one, two, or several (more or less overt) narratees’ [19]. The inclusion of Maniac Mansion in Day of the Tentacle generates a hypodiegetic narrative structure due to the minigame’s fulfilment of Prince’s definitional aspects, while the game of connecting pipes in BioShock does not.

  12. 12.

    The metaphor of the mirror is later also utilised by Lucien Dällenbach: ‘the mise en abyme is any internal mirror reflecting the narrative as a whole by simple, repeated or specious duplication’ [21]. Mieke Bal suggests to abandon the term mise-en-abyme as it does not depict ‘the totality of an image, but only a part of the text, or a certain aspect. […] I suggest we use the term “mirror-text” for mise en abyme’ [22].

  13. 13.

    Abbreviated to GTA hereafter.

  14. 14.

    The minigames in GTA Vice City are unplayable.

  15. 15.

    The game also occurs in GTA V, yet it is not playable.

  16. 16.

    The high scores can be seen and are saved on every machine of the same type. This would not happen in reality unless the machines are connected.

  17. 17.

    Abbreviated to Zelda hereafter.

  18. 18.

    It is important to note that for Link, these activities are real-life practices, wherefore they are termed “simulations” and not “games”.

  19. 19.

    A Clawshot is a latching device with which Link can hang off suspended objects such as trees or walls. A Double Clawshot allows him to shoot a second latch once hanging on the first.

  20. 20.

    In Final Fantasy VIII, Quezacotl is a winged Guardian Force.

  21. 21.

    Easter Eggs – “treasures” hidden within games – need not be games per se. They can be, for example, extra money as in The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past [48], where a hidden room, “The Chris Houlihan Room” [49], contains extra Rupees. While Easter Eggs need not be games, their discovery follows game-like structures because they are hidden and not actually part of the main game. Their detection is akin to a treasure hunt and very often treasures are awaiting the inquisitive player.

References

  1. Tavinor, G.: Videogames and fictionalism. In: Sageng, J.R., Fossheim, H., Larsen, T.M. (eds.) The Philosophy of Computer Games, vol. 7, pp. 185–199. Springer, Dordrecht (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4249-9_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Caillois, R.: Man, Play and Games. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (2001). Translated by Barash, M.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aldrich, C.: The Complete Guide to Simulations & Serious Games: How the Most Valuable Content Will Be Created in the Age Beyond Gutenberg to Google. Pfeiffer, San Francisco (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Genvo, S.: Defining and Designing Expressive Games: The Case of Keys of a Gamespace, pp. 90–106. Kinephanos (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wolf, W.: Ästhetische Illusion und Illusionsdurchbrechung in der Erzählkunst: Theorie und Geschichte mit Schwerpunkt auf englischem illusionsstörenden Erzählen. Niemeyer, Tübingen (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. Angelico Press, Kettering (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fernández-Vara, C.: Play’s the thing: a framework to study videogames as performance. In: Proceedings of DiGRA 2009, Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory, vol. 5. Brunel University, London (2009). http://www.digra.org/digital-library/publications/plays-the-thing-a-framework-to-study-videogames-as-performance/

  8. Consalvo, M.: There is no magic circle. Games Cult. 4(4), 408–417 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412009343575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coleridge, S.T.: Biographia Literaria, vol. 2. Claredon Press, Oxford (1907)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walton, K.L.: Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Harvard University Press, Harvard (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lamarque, P.: The Philosophy of Literature. Blackwell, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Booth, W.C.: The Rhetoric of Fiction. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Waugh, P.: Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. Methuen, London (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goffman, E.: Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  15. 2K Games: BioShock (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Infogrames, et al.: Tetris (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nintendo: Mario Party (1998–2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McHale, B.: Postmodernist Fiction. Routledge, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prince, G.: A Dictionary of Narratology, Rev edn. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cohn, D.: Metalepsis and Mise En Abyme. Narrative 20(1), 105–114 (2012). Translated by Gleich, L.S.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dällenbach, L.: The Mirror in the Text. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1989). Translated by Whiteley, J., Hughes, E.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bal, M.: Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Foucault, M.: The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. Routledge, London (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Rockstar Games: Grand Theft Auto: Vice City (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rockstar Games: Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rockstar Games: Grand Theft Auto IV (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rockstar Games: Grand Theft Auto V (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rockstar Games: Grand Theft Auto Online (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tehkan: Bomb Jack (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rockstar Games: Grand Theft Auto IV: The Lost and Damned (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rockstar Games: Grand Theft Auto IV: The Ballad of Gay Tony (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Compile, Sega: Puyo Puyo (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bethesda Softworks: Fallout 4 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nintendo: Donkey Kong (1981–2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. LucasArts: Day of the Tentacle (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lucasfilm Games: Maniac Mansion (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment: Batman: Arkham City (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment: Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rockstar Games: Red Dead Redemption (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sony Computer Entertainment: Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sony Computer Entertainment, Vivendi Games, Activision: Crash Bandicoot (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nintendo: The Legend of Zelda (1986–2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nintendo: The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Square: Final Fantasy VIII (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Atlus: Catherine (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ubisoft: Far Cry 3 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Eidos Interactive, Giant Interactive Entertainment, Aspyr: LEGO Star Wars (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nintendo: The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Fandom: Top Secret Room. https://zelda.fandom.com/wiki/Top_Secret_Room

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Regina Seiwald .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Seiwald, R. (2019). Games Within Games. In: Zagalo, N., Veloso, A., Costa, L., Mealha, Ó. (eds) Videogame Sciences and Arts. VJ 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1164. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37983-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37983-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37982-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37983-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics