Abstract
The term “preventive justice” was first used in the late eighteenth century and linked to laws aimed at preventing future crime by intervening where, according to Blackstone (Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books. Routledge, 1753), there was a “probable suspicion, that some crime is intended or likely to happen”. The past few decades have seen preventive justice schemes reinvigorated in association with a focus on risk assessment tools aimed at predicting the risk of future harmful behavior. While there has been considerable criticism of the use of risk assessment tools to predict rather than manage behavior, “structured professional judgment”, which combines statistical or actuarial risk prediction with clinical methods, has become an accepted forensic method to help identify those who are at low, moderate or high risk of harming others. Recently, predictive machine learning algorithms have been used to inform judicial decision-making, including sentencing, in the absence of expert testimony about their proper use. These algorithmic assessments may be viewed as an extension of a previous trend toward actuarial prediction tools aimed at assessing the risk of recidivism. This chapter analyzes some of the issues raised by the use of risk assessment tools in predicting the risk of harm. It will argue that there remain serious ethical and human rights concerns with the movement toward predictive algorithms in predicting the risk of future harmful behavior and that structured professional judgment, with all its faults, may in fact be the “least worst” option.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albrecht, H-J 2012, ‘The Incapacitation of the Dangerous Offender: Criminal Policy and Legislation in the Federal Republic of Germany’, in M Malsch & M Duker (eds), Incapacitation: Trends and New Perspectives, Farnham, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, pp. 39–61.
Ashworth, A & Zedner, L 2014, Preventive Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Attorney-General (Qld) v Fardon [2003a] QCA 416.
Attorney-General (Qld) v Fardon [2003b] QSC 200.
Attorney-General (Qld) v George [2009] QSC 2.
Attorney-General (Qld) v McLean [2006] QSC 137.
Australian Government 2011, Response of the Australian Government to the Views of the Committee in Communication No. 1635/2007 Tillman v Australia and Communication No. 1629/2007 Fardon v Australia, Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra.
Baxstrom v Herold 383 US 107 (1966).
Bergman, LR & Magnussuon, D 1997, ‘A Person-Oriented Approach in Research on Developmental Psychopathology’, Development and Psychopathology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 291–319.
Blackstone, W (1753/2001), Commentaries on the Laws of England in Four Books Routledge, London.
Bottoms, AE 2009, ‘Reflections on the Renaissance of Dangerousness’, Howard Journal of Penology and Crime Prevention, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 70–96.
BVerfG (2011a) 2 BvR 2365/09 of 4.5.2011.
BVerfG (2011b) 2 BvR 2846/09 of 8.6.2011.
Campbell, TW 2000, ‘Sexual Predator Evaluations and Phrenology: Considering Issues of Evidentiary Reliability’, Behavioral Sciences and the Law, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 111–130.
Cavadino, M 1998, ‘Death to the Psychopath’, Journal of Forensic Psychiatry vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 5–8.
Davis, MR & Ogloff, JRP 2008, ‘Risk Assessment’, in K Fritzon & P Wilson (eds), Forensic Psychology and Criminology: An Australian Perspective, McGraw-Hill Australia, North Ryde, New South Wales, pp. 141–150.
Director of Public Prosecutions (WA) v Moolarvie [2008] WASC 37.
Douglas, T, Purgh, J, Singh, I, Savulescu, J & Fazek, S 2017, ‘Risk Assessment Tools in Criminal Justice and Forensic Psychiatry: The Need For Better Data,’ European Psychiatry, vol 42, pp. 134–137.
Drenkhahn, K, Morgenstern, C & van Zyl Smit, D 2012, ‘What is in a Name? Preventive Detention in Germany in the Shadow of European Human Rights Law’, Criminal Law Review, issue 3, pp. 167–187.
Ericson, RV 2007, Crime in an Insecure World, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Ewart v Canada [2018] SCC 30.
Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld) (2004) 223 CLR 575.
Farrington, DP (ed) 2005, Integrated Development and Life Course Theories of Offending, Transaction, London: Transaction.
Feeley, M & Simon, J 1992, ‘The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications’, Criminology, vol 30, no. 4, pp. 449–474.
Feeley, M & Simon, J 1994, ‘Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law’, in D Nelken (ed), The Futures of Criminology, Sage, London, pp. 173–201.
Garland, D 2003, ‘Penal Modernism and Postmodernism’, in T Blomberg & S Cohen (eds), Punishment and Social Control: Essays in Honor of Sheldon Messinger, 2nd edn, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 45–73.
Glazebrook, S 2010, ‘Risky Business: Predicting Recidivism,’ Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 88–120.
Gledhill, K 2011, ‘Preventive Sentences and Orders: The Challenges of Due Process’, Journal of Commonwealth Criminal Law, vol. 1, pp. 78–104.
Grosskopf v Germany [2010] 53 EHRR 7.
Haidn v Germany [2011] ECHR 39.
Hannah-Moffat, K 2013, ‘Actuarial Sentencing: An ‘Unsettled’ Proposition’, Justice Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 270–296.
Hare, RD 2002, ‘Psychopathy and Risk for Recidivism and Violence’, in N Gray, J Laing & L Noaks (eds), Criminal Justice, Mental Health and the Politics of Risk, Cavendish, London, pp. 27–47.
Hart, SD 2016, ‘Culture and Violence Risk Assessment: The Case of Ewert v. Canada’, Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 76–96.
Hebenton, B & Seddon T 2009, ‘From Dangerousness to Precaution: Managing Sexual and Violent Offenders in an Insecure and Uncertain Age’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 343–362.
Janus, ES 2004, ‘Sexually Violent Predator Laws: Psychiatry in Service to a Morally Dubious Enterprise’, Lancet, vol. 364, pp. 50–51.
Keyzer, P & Blay, S 2006, ‘Double Punishment? Preventive Detention Schemes Under Australian Legislation and their Consistency with International Law: The Fardon Communication,’ Melbourne Journal of International Law, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 407–424.
Lombroso, C (1876/2006). Criminal Man [L’uomo delinquent], trans. M Gibson & NH Rafter, Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina.
Loomis v Wisconsin 137 S.Ct. 2290 (2017).
Lussier, P & Davies, G 2011, ‘A Person-Oriented Perspective on Sexual Offenders, Offending Trajectories, and Risk of Recidivism: A New Challenge for Policymakers, Risk Assessors and Actuarial Prediction?’, Psychology, Public Policy and Law, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 530–561.
M v Germany [2010] 51 EHRR 41.
McCallum, D 2001, Personality and Dangerousness: Genealogies of Antisocial Personality Disorder, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
McSherry, B 2014, Managing Fear: The Law and Ethics of Preventive Detention and Risk Assessmen, Routledge, New York.
McSherry, B & Keyzer, P 2009, Sex Offenders and Preventive Detention: Politics, Policy and Practice, The Federation Press, Sydney.
Mercado, CC & Ogloff, JRP 2007, ‘Risk and the Preventive Detention of Sex Offenders in Australia and the United States’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 49–59.
Michaelsen, C 2012, ‘“From Strasbourg with Love”: Preventive Detention Before the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights’ Human Rights Law Review, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 148–167.
Mill, JS 1859 [1991], On Liberty and Other Essays, Oxford World Classics edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Monahan, J 1981, The Clinical Prediction of Violent Behavior, National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Olver, ME, Neumann, CS, Sewall, L, Lewis, K, Hare, RD & Wong, SCP 2018, ‘A Comprehensive Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in a Canadian Multisite Sample of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Offender,’ Psychological Assessment, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 779–792.
Petrila, J 2011, ‘Sexually Violent Predator Laws: Going Back to a Time Better Forgotten’, in B McSherry & P Keyzer (eds), Dangerous People: Policy, Prediction and Practice, Routledge, New York, pp. 63–72.
Pratt, J 1997, Governing the Dangerous, Sydney: Federation Press.
Pratt, J 2000, ‘The Return of the Wheelbarrow Men: Or, The Arrival of Postmodern Penality?’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 127–145.
Royal College of Psychiatrists 2005, ‘The Psychiatrist, Court and Sentencing: The Impact of Extended Sentencing on the Ethical Framework of Forensic Psychiatry’, Psychiatric Bulletin, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 73–77.
Salekin, RT, Rogers, R & Sewell, KW 1996, ‘A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist and Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: Predictive Validity of Dangerousness’, Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 203–215.
Singh, JP, Desmarais, SL, Hurducas, C, Arbach-Lucioni, K, Condemarin, C, Dean, K, Doyle, M, Folino, JO, Godoy-Cervera, V, Grann, M, Ho, RMY, Large, MM, Nielsen, LH, Pham, TH, Rebocho, MF, Reeves, KA, Rettenberger, M, de Ruiter, C, Seewald, K & Otto, RK 2014, ‘International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries,’ International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 193–206.
Re Fardon v Australia, Human Rights Committee, Communication No. 1629/2007, UN Doc. CCPR/C/98/D/1629/2007 (12 April 2010).
Re Miller and Carroll v New Zealand, Human Rights Committee, Communication No. 2502/2014, UN Doc. CCPR/C/121/D/2502/2014 (21 November 2014).
Re Tillman v Australia, Human Rights Committee, Communication No. 1635/2007, UN Doc. CCPR/C/98/D/1635/2007 (12 April 2010).
R v Peta [2007] 2 NZLR 627.
Skeem, JL & Cooke, DJ 2010a, ‘Is Criminal Behavior a Central Component of Psychopathy? Conceptual Directions for Resolving the Debate,’ Psychological Assessments, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 433–445.
Skeem, JL & Cooke, DJ 2010b, ‘One Measure Does Not a Construct Make: Directions Toward Reinvigorating Psychopathy Research – Reply to Hare and Neuman (2010)’, Psychological Assessment, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 455–459.
Slobogin, C 2012, ‘Risk Assessment’, in J Petersilia & KR Reitz (eds), Oxford Handbook of Sentencing and Corrections, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 196–214.
Smiles S & Marriner C 2007, ‘PM Defiant: No Visa and No Apology’, The Age, 31 July.
State v Loomis 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis. 2016).
Staum, M 2003, Labelling People: French Scholars on Society, Race and Empire, 1815–1848, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal.
Steadman, HJ 1973, ‘Implications from the Baxstrom Experience’, Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 189–196.
Steadman, HJ 2000, ‘From Dangerousness to Risk Assessment of Community Violence: Taking Stock at the Turn of the Century,’ Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 265–271.
Sullivan, DH, Mullen PE & Pathé MT 2005, ‘Legislation in Victoria on Sexual Offenders: Issues for Health Professionals’, Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 183, no. 6, pp. 318–320.
Thornberry, T P & Krohn, MD (eds) 2003, Taking Stock of Delinquency: An Overview of Findings from Contemporary Longitudinal Studies, Kluwer Academic, New York.
United States Government 2017, ‘Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae’, Loomis v Wisconsin, No. 16-6387.
Zedner, L 2009, Security, Routledge, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McSherry, B. (2020). Risk Assessment, Predictive Algorithms and Preventive Justice. In: Pratt, J., Anderson, J. (eds) Criminal Justice, Risk and the Revolt against Uncertainty. Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37948-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37948-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37947-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37948-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)