Skip to main content

The Politics of Domestic Resource Mobilization for Social Development: Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Politics of Domestic Resource Mobilization for Social Development

Part of the book series: Social Policy in a Development Context ((SPDC))

  • 421 Accesses

Abstract

Hujo presents three overarching conclusions of the research. First, domestic resource mobilization (DRM) is a political process of contestation and bargaining, marked by power asymmetries, and shaped by historical legacies and the present economic and political context. Second, changes and reforms in resource mobilization policies impact relationships among state, civil society, donors and business actors. Third, upgrading both domestic revenue institutions and service delivery requires not only technical capacity building but also political consensus building. The chapters presented in the volume suggest four recommendations for policymakers: create inclusive resource bargains with links to social policy, diversify the financing mix in favour of sustainable instruments, support national bargains with global bargains and create an enabling environment for DRM through public policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This gap is addressed in some of the more recent literature related to Finance for Development in the context of 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. See for example UN (2019).

  2. 2.

    Levi 1988; Brautigam et al. 2008; Moore 2008; Martin et al. 2009.

  3. 3.

    Such as the Domestic Relations Bill or the Anti-Homosexuality Act in 2014, although in the case of the latter the strongest contestation came from the international community and donor countries; see Kangave and Katusiimeh (2015).

References

  • Bangura, Yusuf. 2006. Fiscal and Capacity Building Reform. In Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries: Capacity Challenges to Improve Services, ed. Yusuf Bangura and George A. Larbi, 131–160. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan and United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brautigam, Deborah, Odd-Helge Fjeldstad, and Mick Moore. 2008. Taxation and State-Building in Developing Countries: Capacity and Consent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delmelle, Guy, and Mendoza, René. 2017. Reformas Estatales, Fortalecimiento Institucional y Políticas de Movilización de Recursos en Nicaragua: El Caso del Sector de la Salud. PDRM Working Paper No. 2017-9. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hujo, Katja, and Shea McClanahan, eds. 2009. Financing Social Policy: Mobilizing Resources for Social Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan and United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Pozo, Wilson. 2017. Movilización de Recursos Domésticos, Desarrollo Social y Cambio Institucional: Descentralización y Autonomías Municipales en Bolivia. PDRM Working Paper No. 2017–1. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kangave, Jalia, and Mesharch Katusiimeh. 2015. Tax Bargains: Understanding the Role Played by Public and Private Actors in Influencing Tax Policy Reform in Uganda. PDRM Working Paper No. 2015-2. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, Anne-Mette, and Marianne Ulriksen. 2014. From Consensus to Contention: Changing Revenue and Policy Dynamics in Uganda. PDRM Working Paper No. 2014-21. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Isaac M., Ajay K. Mehrotra, and Monica Prasad, eds. 2009. The New Fiscal Sociology: Taxation in Comparative and Historical Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkandawire, Thandika. 2010. On Tax Efforts and Colonial Heritage in Africa. Journal of Development Studies, 46(10): 1647–1669. Accessed 23 February 2016. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/31211/.

  • Moore, Mick. 2008. Between Coercion and Contract: Competing Narratives on Taxation and Governance. In Taxation and State-Building in Developing Countries: Capacity and Consent, ed. Deborah Brautigam, Odd-Helge Fjeldstad, and Mick Moore, 34–63. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Obstacles to Increasing Tax Revenues in Low Income Countries. International Centre for Tax and Development and UNRISD Working Paper 2013–15. Brighton: ICTD at IDS/UNRISD. Accessed 6 November 2015. http://www.ictd.ac/en/publications/obstacles-increasing-tax-revenues-low-income-countries.

  • UN (United Nations). 2019. Financing for Sustainable Development Report 2019. Inter-agency Task Force on Financing for Development, 235–260. New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNRISD (United Nations Research Institute for Social Development). 2010. Combating Poverty and Inequality: Structural Change, Social Policy and Politics. Flagship Report. Geneva: UNRISD. Accessed 16 March 2016. http://www.unrisd.org/poverty.

  • ———. 2016. Policy Innovations for Transformative Change. Implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Flagship Report. Geneva: UNRISD. Accessed 29 August 2019. http://www.unrisd.org/flagship2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Hujo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 United Nations Research Institute for Social Development

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hujo, K. (2020). The Politics of Domestic Resource Mobilization for Social Development: Conclusions. In: Hujo, K. (eds) The Politics of Domestic Resource Mobilization for Social Development. Social Policy in a Development Context. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37595-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37595-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37594-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37595-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics