Skip to main content

Concluding Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revisiting Secularism in Theory and Practice

Abstract

The relation between church and state, and between the appropriate boundaries of the religious and the political has posed a challenge for scholars and statesmen alike for centuries. Much of the work done on this issue posits a fundamental opposition of modernity and religion and predicts that the practice of the latter inexorably declines as the former progresses (Wilson 1998: 48–49). Calling this “the secularisation theory”, Berger (1999) argues that “modernisation necessarily leads to a decline of religion, both in society and in the minds of individuals; as societies modernize, increasing commitments to scientific rationality and individual autonomy lessen the influence of ‘the sacred’ and of religiously oriented institutions, leading to an inevitable process of secularisation” (Berger 1999: 201–202).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Başkan, B. (2011). Turkey-GCC relations: Is There a future? Insight Turkey, 13(1), 159–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayat, A. (2007). Islam and democracy: What is the real question?. ISIM Paper 8. Leiden: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porat, G. (2013). Why did secular Israelis win Shabbat shopping but forego secular marriage?. Haaretz August 1st.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. (1999). The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics. Washington, DC: The Ethics and Public Policy Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, N. (1998). The development of secularism in Turkey (pp. 481–507). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bokhari, K. & Senzai, F. (2018). The politics of Islamism. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, H. G., & Swyngedouw, J. (2000). The myth of the twentieth century: The rise and fall of secularization. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 27, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, J. L. & Voll, J. O. (1998). İslamiyet ve Demokrasi. Ahmet Fethi (transl.), İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, J. L., & Voll, J. O. (2001). Makers of contemporary Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fazeli, M. (2006). Iranians political attitudes: A national survey. Iranian Students Poling Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazeli, N. (2006b). Politics of culture in Iran: Anthropology, politics and society in the twentieth century. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gasiorowski, M. J. (1987). The 1953 Coup D’etat in Iran. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 19(3), 261–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gencer, B. (2017). İslâm’da Modernleşme, 1839–1939. Ankara: Doğu Batı.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göksel, O. (2016). In Search of a non-eurocentric understanding of modernization: Turkey as a case of ‘multiple modernities’. Mediterranean Politics, 21(2), 246–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, F. (2010). The cold war: Lessons and legacies. Government and Opposition, 45(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi, N. (2013a). The Arab spring two years on: Reflections on dignity, democracy, and devotion. Ethics and International Affairs, 27(2), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi, N. (2013b). Islam and democracy. In John Esposito & Emad Shahin (Eds.), Oxford handbook on Islam and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, S. W. (2010). Religious politics and secular states, Egypt, India, and the United States. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourani, A. (1983). Arabic thought in the liberal age: 1789–1939. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, M. (2001). Civil society and Islam: A sociological perspective. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 42(3), 457–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krzysztof, I. (2015). A critique of the anti-modernist critique of secularism. Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 4(2), 156–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapidus, I. M. (2002). A history of Islamic societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. (1961). The emergence of modern Turkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metwally, M. M. (1997). Economic consequences of applying Islamic principles in Muslim societies. International Journal of Social Economics, 24(7/8/9), 941–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E. C. (1999). Economic and political change in Tunisia: From Bourguiba to Ben Ali. London: Palgrave/Mac Millan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr, V. (2009). Forces of fortune: The rise of the new Muslim middle class and what it will mean for our world. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, K. M. (2006). Secularization: A bibliographic essay. The Hedgehog Review Spring/Summer, 06, 170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamadonfar, M., & Jelen, T. G. (2014). Introduction. In M. Tamadonfar & T. G. Jelen (Eds.), Religion and regimes: Support, separation, and opposition. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, C. (2006). Islam and the moral economy: The challenge of capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S. (1978). Orientalism, Islam and Capitalism. Social compass, 25(3–4), 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ünsar, S. (2008). Endurance of redistributive institutional structure: The role of institutional rigidities in the ottoman case, University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ünsar, S. (2018). On the political economy of Ottoman institutional change: A macro-historical perspective. In Ö. Ü. Eriş & A. S. İkiz (Eds.), The political economy of Muslim countries (pp. 102–121), Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, S. (2005). Islam and the institutions of a free society. The Independent Review: A Journal of Political Economy, 10(1), 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1998). The secularization thesis: criticisms and rebuttals. In R. Laermans, R. Bryan, Wilson & J. Billiet (Eds.), Secularization and social integration (pp. 44–55), Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seda Ünsar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ünsar, S., Ünal Eriş, Ö. (2020). Concluding Remarks. In: Ünsar, S., Ünal Eriş, Ö. (eds) Revisiting Secularism in Theory and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37456-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics