Skip to main content

The Politics of Islamic Opposition to Evolution in Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism

Abstract

Islamic creationism has been very successful in Turkey, finding official as well as grassroots support in an environment shaped by neoliberal Islamism. Opposition to evolution has many local, Turkish and Islamic political rationales. However, as comparison with creationism in the United States demonstrates, creationism also draws political sustenance from a more universal rhetoric of modern conservatism, emphasizing markets, organic communities, and a pragmatic view of science as infrastructure for business and technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, Alison. 2009. Turkish Scientists Claim Darwin Censorship. Nature. http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090310/full/news.2009.150.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2016.

  • AkdoÄŸan, Yalçın. 2004. AK Parti ve Muhafazakar Demokrasi. Ä°stanbul: Alfa Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akyol, Mustafa. 2011. Islam Without Extremes: A Muslim Case for Liberty. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atasoy, Yıldız. 2009. Islam’s Marriage with Neoliberalism: State Transformation in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • AteÅŸ, Süleyman. 1991. Gerçek Din Bu, vol. 1. Ä°stanbul: Yeni Ufuklar NeÅŸriyat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydın, Hasan. 2007. Evrim (bilim) – Yaratılış (din) çatışması üzerine kimi düşünceler. Bilim ve Gelecek 39: 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Postmodern ÇaÄŸda Ä°slam ve Bilim. Ä°stanbul: Bilim ve Gelecek Kitaplığı.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, James, et al. 2013. The World’s Muslims: Religion, Politics and Society. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancke, Stefaan, Hans Henrik Hjermitslev, and Peter C. Kjærgaard, eds. 2014. Creationism in Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. Mackenzie. 2012. Hindu Perspectives on Evolution: Darwin, Dharma, and Design. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Phillip, Hugh Lauder, and David Ashton. 2011. The Global Auction: The Broken Promises of Education, Jobs, and Incomes. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, Jerry A. 2012. Science, Religion, and Society: The Problem of Evolution in America. Evolution 66: 2654–2663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01664.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, David. 2007. The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edis, Taner. 1994. Islamic Creationism in Turkey. Creation/Evolution 34: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Cloning Creationism in Turkey. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 19 (6): 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Science and Nonbelief. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. An Illusion of Harmony: Science and Religion in Islam. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Islam Evolving: Radicalism, Reformation, and the Uneasy Relationship with the Secular West. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edis, Taner, and Saouma BouJaoude. 2014. Rejecting Materialism: Responses to Modern Science in the Muslim Middle East. In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, ed. Michael R. Matthews, vol. III. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenach, Eldon J. 2000. The Next Religious Establishment: National Identity and Political Theology in Post-Protestant America. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshakry, Marwa. 2013. Reading Darwin in Arabic, 1860–1950. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eve, Raymond A., and Francis B. Harrold. 1990. The Creationist Movement in Modern America. Boston: Twayne Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, Nancy. 2010. Saving State U: Why We Must Fix Public Higher Education. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, Barbara, and Paul R. Gross. 2007. Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, Diego, and Steffen Hertog. 2009. Why Are There so Many Engineers Among Islamic Radicals? European Journal of Sociology 50 (2): 201–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, James. 1997. Redeeming Culture: American Religion in an Age of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, Peter D., Alan Beedle, and Mark Hanson. 2009. Principles of Evolutionary Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göle, Nilüfer. 2000. Ä°slam ve Modernlik Ãœzerine Melez Desenler. Ä°stanbul: Metis Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOP Platform. 2012. http://www.scribd.com/doc/104221532/2012-Gop-Platform. Accessed 7 Oct 2016.

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. 1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays. Trans. Ciaran Cronin. Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameed, Salman. 2008. Bracing for Islamic Creationism. Science 322: 1637–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, Joshua D. 2013. KüreselleÅŸme, Ä°slami Aktivizm, ve Türkiye’de Pasif Devrim: Fethullah Gülen ÖrneÄŸi. In Neoliberalizm, Ä°slamcı Sermayenin YükseliÅŸi ve AKP, ed. NeÅŸecan Balkan, Erol Balkan, and Ahmet Öncü. Ä°stanbul: Yordam Kitap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, Arne. 2011. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment in the United States, 1970s–2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, Steve. 2011. Debunking Economics—Revised and Expanded Edition: The Naked Emperor Dethroned? London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koç, Nurettin. 2006. Laik EÄŸitimden Åžeriatçı EÄŸitime: Ulusal EÄŸitimde Çöküş Süreci. Ä°stanbul: Berfin Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotan, Betül. 2006. Bakan Çelik: Yaratılış aynen kalacak. Radikal. http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=180408. Accessed 7 Oct 2016.

  • Lopez, Donald S., Jr. 2008. Buddhism and Science: A Guide for the Perplexed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LordoÄŸlu, Kuvvet, and M. Hakan Koçak. 2015. AKP Döneminde Ä°stihdam, Ä°ÅŸgücü ve Ä°ÅŸsizlik. In Himmet, Fıtrat, Piyasa: AKP Döneminde Sosyal Politika, ed. Meryem Koray and Aziz Çelik. Ä°stanbul: Ä°letiÅŸim Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, Robert N. 2011. Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Stephen C. 2009. Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design. New York: HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa Efendi, Harputizâde Hacı. 2014. In Red ve Isbât: Alman Feylesoflarından Louis Büchner’in Ahmed Nebil, Baha Tevfik Efendiler Tarafından Tercüme Olunan Madde ve Kuvvet Nâm Eserine Reddiyedir, ed. Ibrahim Hakkı Kaynak and Ali Utku. Ä°stanbul: Çizgi Kitabevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newfield, Christopher. 2008. Unmaking the Public University: The Forty-Year Assault on the Middle Class. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numbers, Ronald L. 2006. The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 2010. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, David E. 1996. American Technological Sublime. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, Michael. 1966. Experience and Its Modes. Cambridge, UK: The University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozan, Ebru Deniz. 2012. Gülme Sırası Bizde: 12 Eylül’e Giderken Sermaye Sınıfı Kriz ve Devlet. Ä°stanbul: Metis Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özipek, Bekir Berat. 2011. Muhafazakarlık: Akıl, Toplum, Siyaset. Ä°stanbul: TimaÅŸ Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parla, Taha, and Andrew Davison. 2004. Corporatist Ideology in Kemalist Turkey. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Robert. 1992. The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st-Century Capitalism. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riexinger, Martin. 2008. Propagating Islamic Creationism on the Internet. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 2 (2): 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Reactions of South Asian Muslims to the Theory of Evolution. Welt des Islams 49 (2): 212–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayın, Ãœmit, and Aykut Kence. 1999. Islamic Scientific Creationism. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 19 (6): 18–20, 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Eugenie C. 2004. Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehat, David. 2011. The Myth of American Religious Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamos, Morris H. 1995. The Myth of Scientific Literacy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, Richard P. 2006. Blind Faith: The Unholy Alliance of Religion and Medicine. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg, Anne Ross. 2013. The Mahdi Wears Armani: An Analysis of the Harun Yahya Enterprise. Huddinge: Södertörns Högskola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, Stephen C., and Jacob C. Koella, eds. 2008. Evolution in Health and Disease, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teazis, Christos. 2010. Ä°kincilerin Cumhuriyeti: Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi. Ä°stanbul: Mızrak Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas GOP. 2012. http://www.texasgop.org/wp-content/themes/rpt/images/2012Platform_Final.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2016.

  • TuÄŸal, Cihan. 2009. Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahya, Harun. 2002. Fascism: The Bloody Ideology of Darwinism. Ä°stanbul: Kültür Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Darwinist Propaganda Techniques. Ä°stanbul: Global Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • YalçınoÄŸlu, P. 2009. Impacts of Anti-evolutionist Movements on Educational Policies and Practices in USA and Turkey. Ä°lköğretim Online 8 (1): 254–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yankaya, Dilek. 2014. Yeni Ä°slâmî Burjuvazi: Türk Modeli. Ä°stanbul: Ä°letiÅŸim Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Matt, and Taner Edis. 2004. Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Eugenie Scott and Joshua Rosenau for comments and discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taner Edis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Edis, T. (2020). The Politics of Islamic Opposition to Evolution in Turkey. In: Brown, C.M. (eds) Asian Religious Responses to Darwinism. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 33. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37340-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics