Skip to main content

Hacking the Foodscape: Digital Communication in the Co-design of Sustainable and Inclusive Food Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Local and the Digital in Environmental Communication

Abstract

Supplying healthy, eco-friendly, and affordable food is becoming a priority of governments all over the world as the unsustainability of the industrial food system is realised. At the same time planners, technology companies, and municipal authorities have driven the concept of the “smart” and “resilient” city which has digital communications infrastructure embedded across all functions to ensure sustainable economic development, high standards of living for residents, and efficient resource management. In relation to food, much of this infrastructure to date has focused on the enhancement of procurement strategies and consumption rather than engaging eaters in the co-design of local food environments or “foodscapes”—the places we buy, prepare, talk, share, or glean meaning from food. This chapter explores the potential for digital technologies to enable the participation of all residents, including the food insecure, in co-designing more sustainable and inclusive foodscapes for their communities and therefore be part of broader systems transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • 100 Resilient Cities. (n.d.). http://100resilientcities.org/challenges/food-insecurity/. Viewed 20 Apr 2018.

  • Alberti, M., Marzluff, J. M., Shulenberger, E., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., & Zumbrunnen, C. (2003). Integrating humans into ecology: Opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience, 53(12), 1169–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkon, A. H., Cadji, Y. J., & Moore, F. (2019). Subverting the new narrative: Food, gentrification and resistance in Oakland, California. Agriculture and Human Values. Available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-019-09954-x. Viewed 20 June 2019.

  • Barking and Dagenham Growth Commission. (2015). No-one left behind: In pursuit of growth for the benefit of everyone. Available at https://ww2.lbbd.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/No-one-left-behind-in-pursuit-of-growth-for-the-benefit-of-everyone.pdf. Viewed 12 June 2018.

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of nations: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohstedt, J. (2014). Food riots and the politics of provisions in world history. IDS working paper 444. Institute of Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozhinova, K. (2018). Sixteen apps helping companies and consumers prevent food waste. GreenBiz. Available at https://www.greenbiz.com/article/16-apps-helping-companies-and-consumers-prevent-food-waste

  • Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life and beyond: From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J., & Matamoros-Fernàndez, A. (2016). Mapping sociocultural controversies across digital media platforms: One week of #gamergate on Twitter, YouTube, and Tumblr. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M. (2018). Hacking the food system: Re-making technologies of food justice. In T. Schneider, K. Eli, C. Dolan, & S. Ulijaszek (Eds.), Digital food activism (pp. 25–42). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2001). Acting in an uncertain world. An essay on technical democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanella, T. J. (2006). Urban resilience and the recovery of New Orleans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(2), 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. H. (2014). Tactics of well-being: Mobile media and a new turn in the human-food relationship. In G. Goggin & L. Hjorth (Eds.), Routledge companion to mobile media (pp. 385–395). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Sydney. (2017). Sustainable Sydney 2030: Community strategic plan 2017–2012. Sydney: City of Sydney. Available at https://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/288173/Adopted-Sustainable-Sydney-2030_Accessible-Version.pdf

  • Civic Systems Lab. (2017). Designed to scale: Mass participation to build resilient neighbourhoods. Available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B28SOnHQM5HVV0pyT2p1NGNvQk0/view. Viewed 10 Jan 2018.

  • Cottle, S., & Lester, L. (2011). Transnational protest and the media. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craven, L., Scholsberg, D., & Mann, A. (2018). Addressing the SDGs through food business incubation: FoodLab Sydney. Food & Cities: The role of cities for achieving the sustainable development goals (pp. 145–151). Retrieved from the Barilla Centre for Food & Nutrition website: https://www.barillacfn.com/media/material/food_cities.pdf

  • De Cunto, A., Tegoni, C., Sonnino, R., Michel, C., & Lajili-Djalai, F. (2017). Food in cities: Study on innovation for a sustainable and healthy production, delivery, and consumption of food in cities. Brussels: Directorate General for Research and Innovation, European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., Beilin, R., Isaacs, B., Rose, N., Sanathanam-Martin, M., & Young, M. (2011). Food security for the short or long term? Australia and New Zealand Agri-Food Research Network. http://www.australianfoodsovereigntyalliance.org/blog/2011/06/06/food-security_short_long_term/

  • Eakin, H., Bohle, H. G., Izac, A. M., Reenberg, A., Gregory, P., & Periera, L. (2010). Food, violence, and human rights. In J. Ingram, P. Ericksen, & D. Liverman (Eds.), Food Security and Global Environmental Change (pp. 245–271). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echersley, R. (2019). Ecological democracy and the rise and decline of liberal democracy: Looking back, looking forward. Environmental Politics. Available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09644016.2019.1594536?journalCode=fenp20

  • Every One. Every Day. (2018). Available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K6xFXRLTXIedjmtI4vmv7a4eO7Mkc-7W/view. Viewed 20 June 2018.

  • FAO. (2018). The role of cities in the transformation of food systems: Sharing lessons from the Milan pact cities. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filardi, M. E., & Prato, S. (2018). Reclaiming the future of food: Challenging the dematerialisation of food systems. Right to Food and Nutrition Watch: When Food Becomes Immaterial: Confronting the Digital Age, 10, 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, R. A. (2018). Marketing critical consumption: Cultivating conscious consumers or nurturing an alternative food network on Facebook? In T. Schneider, K. Eli, C. Dolan, & S. Ulijaszek (Eds.), Digital food activism (pp. 110–129). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food Ethics Council. (2017). Food citizenship: How thinking of ourselves differently can change the future of our food system. Food Ethics Council. Available at https://www.foodethicscouncil.org/uploads/publications/FoodCitizenship2017_web.pdf. Viewed 11 May 2018.

  • Fox, R., & Frye, J. (2010). Tensions of praxis: A new taxonomy for social movements. Environmental Communication, 4(4), 422–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, X. (2017). The informational turn in food politics: The US FDA’s nutrition label as information infrastructure. Social Studies of Science, 47(2), 145–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (2012). One third of our greenhouse gases come from agriculture. Nature. Available at https://www.nature.com/news/one-third-of-our-greenhouse-gas-emissions-come-from-agriculture-1.11708

  • Giraud, E. (2018). Displacement, ‘failure’ and friction: Tactical interventions in the communication ecologies of anti-capitalist food activism. In T. Schneider, K. Eli, C. Dolan, & S. Ulijaszek (Eds.), Digital food activism (pp. 130–150). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golay, C. (2010). The food crisis and food security: Towards a New World food order? International Development Policy 1. Available at https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/145

  • Gottlieb, R., & Fisher, A. (1996). Community food security and environmental justice: Searching for a common discourse. Agriculture and Human Values, 3(3), 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasseni, C. (2017). Food citizens: Collective food procurement in European cities: Solidarity and diversity, skills and scale. Available at https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/research/research-projects/social-and-behavioural-sciences/food-citizens-collective-food-procurement-in-european-cities. Viewed 15 June 2018.

  • Guthman, J. (2008). Neo-liberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum, 39(3), 1171–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, G., Collie, N., Lyle, P., Choi, J., & Foth, M. (2014). Using communicative ecology theory to scope the emerging role of social media in the evolution of urban food systems. Futures, 62, 202–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Giménez, E. (2017). A foodie’s guide to capitalism: Understanding the political economy of what we eat. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. (2018). Food politics in a digital era. In T. Scheider, K. Eli, C. Dolan, & S. Ulijaszek (Eds.), Digital food activism. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2018). Cooking, eating, uploading: Digital food cultures. In K. LeBesco & P. Naccarato (Eds.), The handbook of food and popular culture. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, A. (2013). Food sovereignty in a post-organic era. In B. Mascitelli & A. Lobo (Eds.), Organics in the global food chain (pp. 201–229). Ballarat: Connor Court Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, A. (2014). Global activism in food politics: Power shift. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, A. (2016). The right to food and how 1.2 million Australians miss out. Available at https://sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2016/04/11/-the-right-to-food%2D%2D-and-how-1-2-million-australians-miss-out.html. Viewed 13 Apr 2018.

  • Mann, A. (2018a). Food sovereignty: Deep histories, digital activism and the emergence of a transnational public. In M. Phillipov & K. Kirkwood (Eds.), Alternative food politic: From the margins to the mainstream. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, A. (2018b). Hashtag activism and the right to food in Australia. In T. Schneider, K. Eli, C. Dolan, & S. Ulijaszek (Eds.), Digital food activism (pp. 168–184). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, A. (2019). Voice and participation in global food politics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini, E. (2011). The new way of the future: Small, local, open and connected. Social Space. Lien Centre for Social Innovation, 100–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, C. (2011). The city as a machine for learning. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 360–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milan Food Policy Pact. (2015). Available at http://www.milanurbanfoodpolicypact.org/. Viewed 21 Feb 2018.

  • Morgan, K. (2015). Nourishing the city: The rise of the urban food question in the Global North. Urban Studies, 52(8), 1379–1394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014534902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S., & Nambisan, P. (2013). Engaging citizens in co-creation in public services. IBM Center for Business Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, G. (2013, May 27). Change the world. The New Yorker, pp. 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Participatory City Foundation. (2018). Made to measure. London: Participatory City Foundation. Available at http://www.participatorycity.org/made-to-measure-2

  • Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., & Grove, J. M. (2004). Resilient cities: Meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(4), 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pothukuchi, K., & Kaufman, J. L. (1999). Placing the food system on the urban agenda: The role of municipal institutions in food systems planning. Agriculture and Human Values, 16(2), 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renting, H., Schermer, M., & Rossi, A. (2012). Building food democracy: Exploring civic food networks and newly emerging forms of food citizenship. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19(3), 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revi, A., Satterthwaite, D. E., Aragón-Durand, F., Corfee-Morlot, J., Kiunsi, R. B. R., Pelling, M., Roberts, D. C., & Solecki, W. (2014). Urban areas. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 545–612). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotterdam Food Cluster. (2017). Food Innovation Lab. Available at https://www.rotterdamfoodcluster.com/2018/08/07/food-innovation-lab/?lang=en

  • Rousseau, S. (2012). Food and social media: You are what you Tweet. Plymouth: AltaMira Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, T., Eli, K., McLennan, A., Dolan, C., Lezaun, J., & Ulijaszek, S. (2017). Governance by campaign: The co-constitution of food issues, publics, and expertise thorough new information and communication technologies. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1363264.

  • Schneider, T., Eli, K., Dolan, C., & Ulijaszek, S. (2018). Digital food activism. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharing Lab. (2018). Let’s stop talking about smart cities. Available at https://medium.com/we-research-and-expriment-with-how-the-sharing/lets-stop-talking-about-smart-cities-df5a0d187b51. Viewed 14 May 2018.

  • Sonnino, R. (2017). The cultural dynamics of food governance. City, Culture and Society. Available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916617300139. Viewed 12 Mar 2018.

  • Stevens, T. M., Aarts, N., Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Dewulf, A. (2016). Social media as a new playing field for the governance of agro-food sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, L., & Bassarab, K. (2016). Food policy council report 2016. Johns Hopkins Center for a Liveable Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2015). The political ecology of climate change adaptation: Livelihoods, agrarian change and the conflicts of development. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDESA. (2010). World urbanisation prospects: The 2009 revision highlights. New York: UNDESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban Food Futures: ICTs and Opportunities. (2014). Futures, 62, 151–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallauri, U. (2014). Transition Belsize Veg Bag scheme: The role of ICTs in enabling new voices and community alliances around local food production and consumption. Futures, 62, 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, S. J., Campbell, B. M., & Ingram, J. S. I. (2012). Climate change and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witterhold, K. (2018). Political consumers as digital food activists? The role of food in the digitalisation of political consumption. In T. Schneider, K. Eli, C. Dolan, & S. Ulijaszek (Eds.), Digital food activism (pp. 89–109). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alana Mann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mann, A. (2020). Hacking the Foodscape: Digital Communication in the Co-design of Sustainable and Inclusive Food Environments. In: Díaz-Pont, J., Maeseele, P., Egan Sjölander, A., Mishra, M., Foxwell-Norton, K. (eds) The Local and the Digital in Environmental Communication. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37330-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics