Skip to main content

Crisis, Common Sense, and Boredom: A Critique of Neoliberal Hegemony in Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Languages of Resistance, Transformation, and Futurity in Mediterranean Crisis-Scapes

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society ((PSGCS))

Abstract

In the last decade crisis and Kulturkampf have become two essential notions defining the neoliberal transformation Turkey has been going through since the 1980s. Crisis is a recurring concept that has been used in defining the state and condition experienced by Turkish society, following the 1980 coup d’état, which opened the way forward to neoliberalization. Kulturkampf is a relatively new notion that has been put into operation in describing the political culture of Turkey, specifically the last decade with a reference to historical modernization process of the country. Both notions have an explanatory power in understanding the construction of neoliberal populist hegemony of the governing party, the Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi (Justice and Development Party). Sıkıntı yok is a rather new expression which gained widespread usage in the everyday language, popular culture, and politics to the extent that, according to Tanıl Bora, (2018, 36), it has become a sort of milli düstur (“national norm”). In this chapter, Begüm Özden Fırat traces “the prestige and utility” of this new expression, by pondering upon the relation between its literal and figurative uses in the historical context within which it has been invented and spread. Firat first reads sıkıntı yok as an instance of a historical articulation of the common sense as a response to the crisis of culture, and then moves from crisis to critique by conducting a “coherent and critical” analysis of the expression’s literal meaning. Firat argues that this “hidden” literal meaning of the expression lays bare the historical truth of our neoliberal times, that is, there is no time and place to get bored. Intellectual critique, Firat argues, should pay attention to this “good sensical” nucleus in the expression so as to manufacture a counter-hegemony that would face the crisis of neoliberal populist regimes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kulturkampf initially defined the German chancellor Otto van Bismarck’s authoritarian politics of getting rid of the Catholic Church’s cultural and social authority in the final decade of the nineteenth century. See Bora 2018, 258.

  2. 2.

    Such line of thinking of course mystifies the historical formation of class relations and its operation at the socio-political level. Also, the lived experience of the clash between the camps is much more complicated than Akçam would suggest. This clash is undoubtedly taking place in modern cities and is not necessarily lived and experienced as a homogenous polarization between the two camps, and modernizing elites would adopt a discursive pluralism. See Ural 2019.

  3. 3.

    David Forgacs explains the notion of organic crisis as follows: “An ‘organic crisis’ is a crisis of the whole system, in which contradictions in the economic structure have repercussions through the superstructures. One of its signs is when the traditional forms of political representation (parties or party leaders) are no longer recognized as adequate by the economic class or class fraction which they had previously served to represent. It is therefore a crisis of hegemony, since it occurs when a formerly hegemonic class is challenged from below and is no longer able to hold together a cohesive bloc of social alliances” (2000, 420).

  4. 4.

    For a selective list of these new expressions and words, see Bora 2018.

Works Cited

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Begüm Özden Fırat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fırat, B.Ö. (2020). Crisis, Common Sense, and Boredom: A Critique of Neoliberal Hegemony in Turkey. In: Boletsi, M., Houwen, J., Minnaard, L. (eds) Languages of Resistance, Transformation, and Futurity in Mediterranean Crisis-Scapes. Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36415-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics