Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter focuses on a specific type of recent filmmaking using the concept of biopolitics as its main analytical tool. There is, Papanikolaou argues, a “Cinema of Biopolitics” that reflects on how systems of power manage groups of people (from a family to a population) and the bodies of individuals. It is a cinema equally sensitive to forms of response, to noise, unease, and subversion. In order to speak about what is certainly a much larger trend in contemporary world cinema, this chapter turns to the example of recent Greek films (especially those by Lanthimos, Avranas, Makridis, Tsangari, Tzoumerkas, and Koutras), which critics have termed “The Greek Weird Wave.” Since 2009, these films have engaged with and provoked discussion about issues such as the politics of life and death, national identity and belonging, kinship and gender, modernization and the public sphere, social disturbance, surveillance, and control. Contrary to expectation, the Greek films in question undermined a tradition of cinematic realism and seemed to be proposing a new form of capitalist realism, a biopolitical realism. They merged micro-stories of precarity, control, and resistance with subtle references to the macro-histories of exploitation, uneven economic development, disinvestment, and revolt. Moreover, they turned their focus on the body, as both a discipline and desiring machine, but also as a platform for a poetics of resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I am paraphrasing here a line of thought that has been prevalent in recent affect theoretical approaches to film, some more phenomenological (as Sobchack 2000; Shaviro 1993) which argue that the body responds before it makes conscious reflective thought of what is being watched on screen, and others more specifically influenced by Deleuze, which theorize on an assemblage of image-sound-space-time-viewer, as does beautifully, for instance, Pepita Hesselberth (2012). Recent discussion on New Extremism makes use of both such approaches (and other affect theory arguments), in order to return to what for many seems an obvious statement: New extremism exploits cinema’s ability to make you feel before thinking (Horeck and Kendall 2011).

  2. 2.

    See also, among many others, Varikos (2013) and Aftab (2013), as well as the discussion in Aleksic (2016) and Psaras (2015).

  3. 3.

    A similar, very measured account of the thematic threads of the Greek New Wave, is proposed by Anna Poupou and Afroditi Nikolaidou (2017), who take into account both the Greek and international reception of these films.

  4. 4.

    A very well-known indication of that interweaving was the rise in the power and social presence of the neo-fascist group Golden Dawn, who supported outright racist politics, glorified the bodies of “Greeks” and targeted the bodies of “others,” especially the bodies of racially marked refugees and migrants. However, Golden Dawn’s discourse (and its significant sudden rise in popularity) fits in with a larger biopolitical discourse, often also articulated by mainstream politicians and official policies (see, among many others, Kotouza 2019).

  5. 5.

    The economic and sociopolitical crisis that started in Greece after 2008 has had many different turns, has seen diverse developments, and in many ways is still with us at the moment these lines are written, even if it has been officially declared over. We cannot, therefore, easily talk about a monolithic, concrete period. Having said that, there is a public discourse of a prolonged state of emergency, a political debate about it, a certain understanding of it as a historical period, and an iconography, that have resulted in producing a narrative of the Greek Crisis as more concrete and shaped. It is to this shaping narrative of our lives that I, along with many others, refer to as the Greek Crisis, with a capital C.

  6. 6.

    The insights of this analysis notwithstanding, Karalis seems to be adopting without nuance the narrative that the Greek governments (which he takes as single, unified actors) kept offering money that was non-existent, and thus created a state in implosion.

  7. 7.

     Note Attenberg’s impact on the more recent Park (dir. Sophia Exarchou, 2016), and the internationally successful shorts Copa Loca (dir. Christos Massalas, 2017), Hector Malot: The Last Day of the Year (dir. Jacquelin Lentzou, 2018), and The Distance Between the Sky and Us (dir. Vassilis Kekatos, 2019).

Works Cited

  • Aftab, Kaleem. 2013. Miss Violence Examines the Malaise in Greek Society. The National, December 10. Accessed September 10, 2019. https://www.thenational.ae/arts-culture/miss-violence-examines-the-malaise-in-greek-society-1.286211.

  • Aleksic, Tatjana. 2016. Sex, Violence, Dogs and the Impossibility of Escape: Why Contemporrary Greek Film is So Focused on Family. Journal of Greek Media and Culture 2 (2): 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, Lauren. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Richard. 2016. The Petty Laments of Yorgos Lanthimos’s The Lobster. The New Yorker, May 23. Accessed September 1, 2019. https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/the-petty-laments-of-yorgos-lanthimoss-the-lobster.

  • Campbell, Timothy. 2017. The Techne of Life: Cinema and the Generous Forms of Life. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalkou, Maria. 2012. A New Cinema of Emancipation: Tendencies of Independence in Greek Cinema of 2000s. Interactions: Studies in Communications and Culture 3 (2): 243–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca, Tiago. 2014. Realism of the Senses. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, Mary Ann. 2007. Indexicality: Trace and Sign: Introduction. differences 18 (1): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Mark. 2009. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? New Alresford: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauley, Jon. 2010. Criminology, Deviance and the Silver Screen. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gedgaudaite, Kristina. 2018. Smyrna in Your Pocket: Memory of Asia Minor in Contemporary Greek Culture. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford, Oxford. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:864a8d4f-0e50-4241-8552-50bef1077f95.

  • Giannakopoulos, Georgios. 2016. Depicting the Pain of Others: Photographic Representations of Refugees in the Aegean Shores. Journal of Greek Media and Culture 2 (1): 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannouri, Evgenia. 2014. Matchbox, Knifer and the ‘Oikographic’ Hypothesis. Filmicon 2: 156–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronstad, Asbjorn, and Henrik Gustafsson, eds. 2014. Cinema and Agamben. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesselberth, Pepita. 2012. Cinematic Chronotopes: Affective Encounters in Space-Time. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horeck, C. Tanya, and Tina Kendall. 2011. The New Extremism in Cinema: From France to Europe. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaloudi, Kostoula. 2014. La Violence du quotidian dans le cinema Grec contemporain: L’Exemple du cineaste Giannis Oikonomidis. In La Violence du quotidian: Formes et figures contemporaines de la violence au théâtre et au cinema, ed. Florence Thérond, 83–92. Laverin: L’Entretemps.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karalis, Vrasidas. 2014. Realism in Greek Cinema: From the Postwar Period to the Present. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotouza, Dimitra. 2019. Surplus Citizens: Struggle and Nationalim in the Greek Crisis. London: Pluto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kourelou, Olga, Mariana Liz, and Belen Vidal. 2014. Crisis and Creativity: The New Cinemas of Portugal, Greece and Spain. New Cinemas 12 (1–2): 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Domenico. 2013. Miss Violence: A Family Code of Silence. Cineurope, September 1. Accessed September 10, 2019. https://cineuropa.org/en/newsdetail/243436/.

  • Mademli, Geli. 2016. From the Crisis of Cinema to the Cinema of Crisis: A ‘Weird’ Label for Contemporary Greek Cinema. Frames Cinema Journal 9. http://framescinemajournal.com/article/from-the-crisis-of-cinema-to-the-cinema-of-crisis-a-weird-label-for-contemporary-greek-cinema/.

  • Mulvey, Laura. 2006. Death 24× a Second. London: Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neroni, Hilary. 2015. Psychoanalysis and Biopolitics in Television and Film. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaidou, Afroditi, and Anna Poupou. 2017. Post-weird Notes on the New Wave of Greek Cinema. In Non-catalog, ed. Orestis Andreadakis, 26–107. Thessaloniki: 58th Thessaloniki International Film Festival.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou, Lydia. 2017. The Economy and Ecology of Greek Cinema since the Crisis: Production, Circulation, Reception. In Greece in Crisis: The Cultural Political of Austerity, ed. Dimitris Tziovas, 135–157. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanikolaou, Dimitris. 2011. Archive Trouble: Cultural Responses to the Greek Crisis. In Beyond the Greek Crisis: Histories, Rhetorics, Politics, ed. Penelope Papailias. Hot Spots on Cultural Anthropology website, October 10. Accessed September 10, 2019. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/archive-trouble.

  • ———. 2017. Archive Trouble, 2017. In Culturescapes: Archaeology of the Future, ed. Kateryna Botanova, Christos Chryssopoulos, and Jurriaan Cooiman, 38–52. Basel: Cristoph Merian Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. How Metonymical Are You? Notes on Biopolitical Realism. In Non Catalog, ed. Orestis Andreadakis and Geli Mademli, 104–125. Thessaloniki: 21st Documentary Film Festival.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petsini, Penelope, ed. 2018. Capitalist Realism: Future Perfect/Past Continuous. Thessaloniki: University of Macedonia/Thessaloniki Museum of Photography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politakis, Dimitris. 2019. Theloume ki emeis ligi agapi apo to elliniko cinema [We also want a little love from Greek cinema]. Lifo 616, February 28. Accessed September 10, 2019. https://www.lifo.gr/print/shortcut/227999/theloyme-ki-emeis-ligi-agapi-apo-to-elliniko-sinema.

  • Psaras, Marios. 2015. Miss Violence: Film Review. Filmicon 3: 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawes, Peg, Timothy Mathews, and Stephen Loo, eds. 2016. Poetic Biopolitics: Practices of Relation in Architecture and the Arts. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Steve. 2011. Dogtooth, Attenberg and the Weird Wave of Greek Cinema. The Guardian, August 27. Accessed September 12, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2011/aug/27/attenberg-dogtooth-greece-cinema.

  • Rushing, Robert. 2016. Descended from Hercules: Biopolitics and the Muscled Body on Screen. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shaviro, Steven. 1993. The Cinematic Body. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonkwiler, Alison, and Leigh Claire La Berge, eds. 2014. Reading Capitalist Realism. University of Iowa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobchack, Vivian. 2000. What My Fingers Knew: The Synesthetic Subject or Visions in the Flesh. Senses of Cinema 5 (April). Accessed September 10, 2019. http://sensesofcinema.com/2000/conference-special-effects-special-affects/fingers/#31

  • Spatharakis, Kostas. 2011. I oikogeneiaki alligoria kai i anazitisi tou politikou [Family allegory and the search for the political]. Leuga 1: 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyerl, Hito. 2003: Politics of Truth: Documentarism in the Art Field. springerin 3. Accessed September 10, 2019. https://www.springerin.at/en/2003/3/politik-der-wahrheit/.

  • Valiaho, Pasi. 2014. Biopolitical Screens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Varikos, Joanna. 2013. Miss Violence Director Talks Filmmaking Amongst Greek Crisis. The Greek Hollywood Reporter, October 14. Accessed September 10, 2019. https://hollywood.greekreporter.com/2013/10/14/interview-miss-violence-director-talks-filmmaking-amongst-greek-crisis/.

  • Williams, Raymond. 1961. The Long Revolution. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Papanikolaou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Papanikolaou, D. (2020). Greek Weird Wave; Or, on How to Do a Cinema of Biopolitics. In: Boletsi, M., Houwen, J., Minnaard, L. (eds) Languages of Resistance, Transformation, and Futurity in Mediterranean Crisis-Scapes. Palgrave Studies in Globalization, Culture and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36415-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics