Skip to main content

Conceptual and Methodological Considerations of Gaming Disorder and Internet Gaming Disorder

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Textbook of Addiction Treatment

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the current conceptual and methodological challenges in light of gaming disorder recently being included in the ICD-11 (WHO, Gaming disorder, 2018). This is discussed in reference to the DSM-5 (APA, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association, 2013) with its more tentative approach of adding Internet gaming disorder (IGD) in the appendix as a condition for further study. The debate is summarised to present the disparities between these two diagnostic manuals, along with a range of other key conceptual challenges which call for a cautious approach when inferring diagnostic efficacy from these clinical manuals. These issues include definitional differences, impact of game classifications and the various behaviours afforded to these based on game type, game function and form of gaming. Further to this, methodological issues are drawn out to highlight the potential limitations of the academic evidence base in this field. As such, this chapter provides a critical review of the conceptual issues with considerations of the practical and clinical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews S, Ellis DA, Shaw H, Piwek L. Beyond self-report: tools to compare estimated and real-world smartphone use. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Balakrishnan J, Griffiths MD. Perceived addictiveness of smartphone games: a content analysis of game reviews by players. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2018;17:922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9897-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Besser B, Loerbroks L, Bischof G, Bischof A, Rumpf HJ. Performance of the DSM-5-based criteria for internet addiction: a factor analytical examination of three samples. J Behav Addict. 2019;8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Billieux J, Flayelle M, Rumpf H-J, Stein DJ. High involvement versus pathological involvement in video games: a crucial distinction for ensuring the validity and utility of gaming disorder. Curr Addict Rep. 2019;6:323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00259-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Billieux J, King DL, Higuchi S, Achab S, Bowden-Jones H, Hao W, et al. Functional impairment matters in the screening and diagnosis of gaming disorder. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(3):285–9. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charlton J, Danforth IDW. Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing. Comput Hum Behav. 2007;23(3):1531–48.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Colder Carras M, Kardefelt-Winther D. When addiction symptoms and life problems diverge: a latent class analysis of problematic gaming in a representative multinational sample of European adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;27:513–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1108-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Colder Carras M, Porter AM, Van Rooij AJ, King D, Lange A, Carras M, Labrique A. Gamers’ insights into the phenomenology of normal gaming and game “addiction”: a mixed methods study. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;79:238–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Egliston B. Playing across media: exploring transtextuality in competitive games and eSports. Proceedings of DiGRA 2015: diversity of play: games, cultures, identities. 2015. Retrieved 26 July 2017, from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/122_Egliston_Playing-Across-Media.pdf.

  11. Eklund L. Who are the casual gamers? Gender tropes and tokenism in game culture. In: Leaver T, Willson M, editors. Social, casual and mobile games: the changing gaming landscape. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2016. p. 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ellis DA, Davidson BI, Shaw H, Geyer K. Do smartphone usage scales predict behaviour? Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2018a;130:86. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/6fjr7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ellis DA, Kaye LK, Wilcockson TDW, Ryding FC. Digital traces of behaviour within addiction: response to Griffiths (2017). Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2018b;16(1):240–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9855-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feldman JM, Lynch JG. Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. J Appl Psychol. 1988;73(3):421–35.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gentile D. Pathological video-game use among youth ages 8 to 18: a national study. Psychol Sci. 2009;20(5):594–602.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Griffiths MD. The role of context in online gaming excess and addiction: some case study evidence. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2010;8(1):119–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9229-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffiths MD. Conceptual issues concerning internet addiction and internet gaming disorder: further critique on Ryding and Kaye (2017). Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2018;16(1):233–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9818-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Griffiths MD, Nuyens F. An overview of structural characteristics in problematic video game playing. Curr Addict Rep. 2017;4(3):272–83.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Griffiths MD, Van Rooij AJ, Kardefelt-Winther D, et al. Working towards an international consensus on criteria for assessing Internet gaming disorder: a critical commentary on Petry et al. (2014). Addiction. 2016;111:167–75.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jenny SE, Manning RD, Keiper MC, Olrich TW. Virtual(ly) athletes: where eSports fit within the definition of “sport”. Quest. 2016;69(1):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Juul J. A casual revolution: reinvesting video games and their players. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaye LK. Gaming classifications and player demographics. In: Attrill-Smith A, Fullwood C, Kuss D, Keep M, editors. Oxford handbook of cyberpsychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kaye LK. The role of gamer identity on digital gaming outcomes. In Proceedings of the HCI International 2019: 8th International Conference on Design, User Experience and Usability. Orlando, Florida, USA, 26th–31st July 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim NR, Hwang SSH, Choi JS, Kim DJ, Demetrovics Z, Király O, et al. Characteristics and psychiatric symptoms of internet gaming disorder among adults using self-reported DSM-5 criteria. Psychiatry Investig. 2016;13(1):58–66. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2016.13.1.58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim SN, Kim M, Lee TH, Lee J-Y, Park S, Park M, Kim D-J, Kwon JS, Choi J-S. Increased attentional bias toward visual cues in internet gaming disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: an event-related potential study. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. King DL, Delfabbro P. Internet gaming disorder treatment: a review of definitions of diagnosis and treatment outcome. J Clin Psychol. 2014;70(10):942–55.

    Google Scholar 

  27. King DL, Delfabbro PH, Doh YY, Wu AMS, Kuss DJ, Pallesen S, Mentzoni R, Carragher N, Sakuma H. Policy and prevention approaches for disordered and hazardous gaming and internet use: an international perspective. Prev Sci. 2018;19(2):233–49.

    Google Scholar 

  28. King D, Delfabbro P, Griffiths MD. Video game structural characteristics: a new psychological taxonomy. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2010a;8:90–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9206-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. King D, Delfabbro P, Griffiths MD. The role of structural characteristics in problematic video game play: an empirical study. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2010b;9(3):320–33.

    Google Scholar 

  30. King DL, Delfabbro PH, Potenza MN, Demetrovics Z, Billieux J, Brand M. Logic, evidence and consensus: towards a more constructive debate on gaming disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019;53:1047. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867419864435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. King DL, Delfabbro PH, Zajac IT. Preliminary validation of a new clinical tool for identifying problem video game playing. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2011;9(1):72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Király O, Bothe B, Ramos-Diaz J, Rahimi-Movaghar A, Lukavska K, Hrabec O, et al. Ten-item internet gaming disorder test (IGDT-10): measurement invariance and cross-cultural validation across seven language-based samples. Psychol Addict Behav. 2019;33(1):91–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Király O, Demetrovics Z. Inclusion of gaming disorder in ICD has more advantages than disadvantages. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(3):280. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Király O, Griffiths MD, Demetrovics Z. Internet gaming disorder and the DSM-5: conceptualization, debates, and controversies. Curr Addict Rep. 2015;2(3):254–62.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Klemm C, Pieters W. Game mechanics and technological mediation: an ethical perspective on the effects of MMORPGs. Ethics Inf Technol. 2017;19(2):81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen SH, Wang PW, Chen CS, Yen CF. Evaluation of the diagnostic criteria of internet gaming disorder in the DSM-5 among young adults in Taiwan. J Psychiatr Res. 2014;53:103–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Krossbakken E, Torsheim T, Mentzoni RA, King DL, Bjorvatn B, Lorvik IM, Pallesen S. The effectiveness of a parental guide for prevention of problematic video gaming in children: a public health randomized controlled intervention study. J Behav Addict. 2018;7(1):52–61. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kultima A. Casual game design values. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual international mindtrek conference: everyday life in the ubiquitous era: ACM; 2009. p. 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/1621841.1621854.

  39. Kuss DJ. Internet gaming addiction: current perspectives. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2013;6:125–37.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Internet gaming addiction: a systematic review of empirical research. Int J Ment Heal Addict. 2012;10(2):278–96.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Pontes HM. Chaos and confusion in DSM-5 diagnosis of internet gaming disorder: issues, concerns, and recommendations for clarity in the field. J Behav Addict. 2016;7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Pontes HM. DSM-5 diagnosis of internet gaming disorder: some ways forward in overcoming issues and concerns in the gaming studies field. J Behav Addict. 2017;6:133. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kuss DJ, Louws J, Wiers RWW. Online gaming addiction? Motives predict addictive play behavior in massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012;15(9):480–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kuss DJ, Pontes HM, Griffiths MD. Neurobiological correlates in internet gaming disorder: a systematic literature review. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:166–77. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Development and validation of a game addiction scale for adolescents. Media Psychol. 2009;12(1):77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM, Gentile DA. The Internet Gaming Disorder Scale. Psychological Assessment. 2015;27(2):567–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000062.

  47. Lopez-Fernandez O, Männikkö N, Kääriäinen M, Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ. Mobile gaming and problematic smartphone use: a comparative study between Belgium and Finland. J Behav Addict. 2018;7(1):88–99. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Marty-Dugas J, Ralph BCW. The relation between smartphone use and everyday inattention. Psychol Conscious Theory Res Pract. 2018;5:46–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Muller KW, Beutel ME, Dreier M, Wolfling K. A clinical evaluation of the DSM-5 criteria for internet gaming disorder and a pilot study on their applicability to further internet-related disorders. J Behav Addict. 2019;8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Myrseth H, Notelaers G. A latent class approach for classifying the problem and disordered gamers in a group of adolescence. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nagygyorgy K, Urban R, Farkas J, Griffiths MD, Zilahy D, Kokonyei G, et al. Typology and sociodemographic characteristics of massively multiplayer online game players. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2013;29(3):192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nuyens F, Kuss DJ, Lopez-Fernandez O, Griffiths MD. The experimental analysis of problematic video gaming and cognitive skills: a systematic review. J Behav Cogn Ther/Journal de Thérapie Comportementale et Cognitive. 2017;27(3):110–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcc.2017.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Petry NM, O’Brien CP. Internet gaming disorder and the DSM-5. Addiction. 2013;108(7):1186–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Petry NM, Rehbein F, Gentile DA, et al. An international consensus for assessing internet gaming disorder using the new DSM-5 approach. Addiction. 2014a;109:1399–406.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Petry NM, Rehbein F, Gentile DA, et al. Moving internet gaming disorder forward: a reply. Addiction. 2014b;109:1412–3.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Petry NM, Zajac K, Ginley M, Lemmens J, Rumpf HJ, Ko CH, Rehbein F. Policy and prevention efforts for gaming should consider a broad perspective. J Behav Addict. 2018;7:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Pontes HM, Griffiths MD. Measuring DSM-5 internet gaming disorder: development and validation of a short psychometric scale. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;45:137–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pontes HM, Király O, Demetrovics Z, Griffiths MD. The conceptualisation and measurement of DSM-5 internet gaming disorder: the development of the IGD-20 test. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e110137. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Rehbein F, Kliem S, Baier D, Mößle T, Petry NM. Prevalence of internet gaming disorder in German adolescents: diagnostic contribution of the nine DSM-5 criteria in a state-wide representative sample. Addiction. 2015;110(5):842–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rumpf H, Achab S, Billieux J, Bowden-Jones H, Carragher N, Demetrovics Z, et al. Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: the need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective: commentary on: a weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: let us err on the side of caution (van Rooij et al., 2018). J Behav Addic. 2018a;7(3):556–61. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rumpf H-J, Bischof A, Bischof G, Besser B, Brand D, Rehbein F. Early intervention in gaming disorder: what can we learn from findings in the substance abuse field? Curr Addict Rep. 2018b;5(4):511–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-018-0229-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Rumpf H-J, Brandt D, Demetrovics Z, Billieux J, Carragher N, Brand M, et al. Epidemiological challenges in the study of behavioral addictions: a call for high standard methodologies. Curr Addict Rep. 2019;6:331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-019-00262-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Saunders JB. Substance use and addictive disorders in DSM-5 and ICD 10 and the draft ICD 11. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2017;30(4):227–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Saunders JB, Hao W, Long J, King DL, Mann K, Fauth-Buhler M, et al. Gaming disorder: its delineation as an important condition for diagnosis, management, and prevention. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(3):271–9. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Thomas NJ, Martin FH. Video-arcade game, computer game and Internet activities of Australian students: Participation habits and prevalence of addiction. Australian Journal of Psychology. 2010;62(2):59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  66. UKie. The games industry in numbers. 2018. Retrieved on 2 Jan 2019, from https://ukie.org.uk/research#Market.

  67. Van Rooij AJ, Ferguson C, Carras MC, Kardefelt-Winther D, Shi J, Aarseth E, et al. A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: let us err on the side of caution. J Behav Addic. 2018;7(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Westwood D, Griffiths MD. The role of structural characteristics in video-game play motivation: a Q-methodology study. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010;13(5):581–5.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Wiers RW, Stacy AW. Implicit cognition and addiction. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006;15(6):292–6.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wolfling K, Muller KW, Dreier M, Ruckes C, Deuster O, Batra A, et al. Efficacy of short-term treatment of internet and computer game addiction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76:1018. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. World Health Organisation. Gaming disorder. 2018. Retrieved 2 Feb 2018, from https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a%2f%2fid.who.int%2ficd%2fentity%2f1448597234.

  72. Wyer RS, Srull TK. Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Young KS. Caught in the net. New York: Wiley; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Daria J. Kuss or Hans-Jürgen Rumpf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kaye, L.K., Kuss, D.J., Rumpf, HJ. (2021). Conceptual and Methodological Considerations of Gaming Disorder and Internet Gaming Disorder. In: el-Guebaly, N., Carrà, G., Galanter, M., Baldacchino, A.M. (eds) Textbook of Addiction Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36391-8_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36391-8_68

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36390-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36391-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics