Skip to main content

The Dreyfus Affair and the Rise of Political Religion in France

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Why Religion? Towards a Critical Philosophy of Law, Peace and God

Abstract

The accusation and conviction of Alfred Dreyfus was one of the most shameful events in the history of the European judiciary and a great political scandal, which took place in France at the end of the 19th century and absorbed people in the rest of Europe. Many key figures in the so call Dreyfus affair were opponents of the parliamentary values, human rights, secular republic and promoted the strong reactionary feelings especially in the army and clericals group. The conflict over the Dreyfus case to a large extent consolidated two opposing visions of the state—the reactionary and the republican one—as well as helped to establish their underlying ideological narratives. The clash of values revealed by the Dreyfus affair has left the French democratic landscape deeply divided into the secular, republican side and the conservative right advocating the public role and influence of religion and allied with the religious communities. Ultimately it has led to the replacement of the old principle l’Église au pouvoir by the French doctrine of laïcité and implement the French model of the separation of religion and public domain. This social division and its underlying ideological narratives have been dominating the European political life ever since and to a large extent shaped the modern democracies all over the continent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Affair has also continued to inspire analyses of various different phenomena as analogous in this or that respect to what the point of the Dreyfus case actually were—as e.g. Begley (2009).

  2. 2.

    Thomas (1961).

  3. 3.

    For more on the significance of the transparency in the operations of the public administration and the perils of its shortcomings, see Bogucka and Pietrzykowski (2012), pp. 188–194.

  4. 4.

    Reinach (1911).

  5. 5.

    Chapman (1972); the title includes important analyses of the legal and military issues of the Affair.

  6. 6.

    Albert (1972).

  7. 7.

    Cahm (1996).

  8. 8.

    Rémond (1982).

  9. 9.

    Mayer and Reberioux (1984).

  10. 10.

    Byrnes (1969).

  11. 11.

    Zola (1898).

  12. 12.

    Duclert (2006), Harris (2010b), p. 107.

  13. 13.

    Sternhell (1978).

  14. 14.

    Budzanowska (2014).

  15. 15.

    Wilson (1982).

  16. 16.

    Sternhell (1972).

  17. 17.

    Arendt (1973), p. 132.

  18. 18.

    Harris (2010a), p. 217.

  19. 19.

    Leblois (2011).

  20. 20.

    The secret service became “a common fake factory”, putting great efforts to maintain the accusation against Dreyfus; see Read (2013), p. 196.

  21. 21.

    On political neutrality as a value of public administration, see Bogucka and Pietrzykowski (2012), p. 200.

  22. 22.

    On the danger of turning state and law into the primary instrument of oppression as one of the key ideas behind the modern Western legal culture, see Pietrzykowski (2014).

  23. 23.

    Dansette (1965).

  24. 24.

    Capéran (1948).

  25. 25.

    Lecanuet (1930).

  26. 26.

    Ory and Sirinelli (1986).

  27. 27.

    Boussel (1960).

  28. 28.

    Cahm (1994).

  29. 29.

    Kedwark (1965).

  30. 30.

    Dansette (1948).

  31. 31.

    Mayeur (1991).

  32. 32.

    Olivesi and Nouschi (1995).

  33. 33.

    Lattes (1998).

  34. 34.

    See Footnote 8.

  35. 35.

    Rioux (1977).

  36. 36.

    Vandromme (1965).

  37. 37.

    Maurras (1906), p. 61.

  38. 38.

    Leo XIII (1892).

  39. 39.

    Chapman (1955).

  40. 40.

    Maurras (1909), p. 459.

  41. 41.

    Prévotat (2001).

  42. 42.

    Dimier (1926), pp. 85–86.

  43. 43.

    Maurras (1912), p. 58.

  44. 44.

    Juillard (1958).

  45. 45.

    Maurras(1906).

  46. 46.

    Maurras (1906), p. 60.

  47. 47.

    Maurras (1912), p. 60.

  48. 48.

    Maurras (1937).

  49. 49.

    Pègues (1913), p. 342.

  50. 50.

    Sorlin (1966).

  51. 51.

    Pope Pius XI (1927).

  52. 52.

    See Footnote 37.

References

  • Albert P (1972) Histoire générale de la presse française, vol III, De 1870 à 1940. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt H (1973) The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt, Brace & World, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Begley L (2009) Why the Dreyfus affair matters. Yale University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogucka I, Pietrzykowski T (2012) Etyka w administracji publicznej. LexixsNexis, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Boussel P (1960) L’Affaire Dreyfus et la presse. Armand Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Budzanowska A (2014) Charles Maurras – twórca nacjonalizmu integralnego. Księgarnia Akademicka, Kraków

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes RF (1969) Antisemitism in modern France. The prologue to the Dreyfus affair. Howard Fertig, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahm E (1994) La première affaire Dreyfus dans la presse et dans l’opinion en 1894-1895: une préfiguration. In: Les représentations de l’Affaire Dreyfus dans la presse en France et à l’étranger. Publication de l’Université de F. Rabelais, Tours, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahm E (1996) The Dreyfus affair in French society and politics. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Capéran L (1948) L’anticléricalisme et l’Affaire Dreyfus. Imprimerie Régionale, Toulouse

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman G (1955) The Dreyfus case. A reassessment. Rupert Hart-Davis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman G (1972) The Dreyfus trials. Harper Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansette A (1948) Histoire religieuse de la France contemporaine. De la Révolution à la IIIe République. Flammarion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansette A (1965) Histoire religieuse de la France contemporaine. L’Église catholique dans la mêlée politique et sociale. Flammarion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimier L (1926) Vingt ans d’Action française et autres souvenirs. Nouvelle Librairie Nationale, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Duclert V (2006) L’affaire Dreyfus. Edition La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R (2010a) Dreyfus: politics, emotion and the scandal of the century. Picador, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R (2010b) The man on the devil’s Island Alfred Dreyfus and the affair that divided France. Penguin Book, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Juillard J (1958) La politique religieuse de Charles Maurras. Esprit 259(3):359–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedwark R (1965) The Dreyfus affair. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattes J-C (1998) A l’école de l’Action française. Un siècle de vie intellectuelle. La Librairie canadienne, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblois L (2011) L’affaire Dreyfus: L’iniquité. La reparation. Les principaux faits et les principaux documents. Theolib, Saint-Martin de Bonfossé

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Lecanuet RP (1930) Les signes avant-coureurs de la Séparation: les dernières années de Léon XIII et l’avènement de Pie X (1894–1910). Librairie Felix Alcan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Leo XIII (1892 ) Au milieu des sollicitudes. Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII On The Church and State in France. http://w2.vatican.va/content/leoxiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_16021892_au-milieu-des-sollicitudes.html. Accessed 16 Nov 2019

  • Maurras Ch (1906) Le dilemme de Marc Sangnier. Essai sur la démocratie religieuse. Nouvelle Librairie Nationale, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurras Ch (1909) L’Enquête sur la monarchie. Nouvelle Librairie Nationale, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurras Ch (1912) La démocratie religieuse. Nouvelle Librairie Nationale, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurras Ch (1937) Mes idées politiques. Fayard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayeur J-M (1991) La séparation des Eglises et de l’Etat. Les Editions Ouvrières, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer J-M, Reberioux M (1984) The Third Republic from its origins to the Great War, 1871–1914. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivesi A, Nouschi A (1995) La France de 1848 à 1914. Nathan Université, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ory P, Sirinelli J-F (1986) Les intellectuels en France, de l’Affaire Dreyfus à nos jour. Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pègues T (1913) Chronique de théologie morale speculative. Revue thomiste 21(1–6):328–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrzykowski T (2014) Ujarzmianie Lewiatana. Szkice o idei rządów prawa. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope Pius XI (1927) Lettre de S.S.A. Pie XI au Cardinal Andrieu, AAS-19-1927

    Google Scholar 

  • Prévotat J (2001) Les catholiques et l’Action française. Histoire d’une condamnation 1899–1926. Fayard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Read P (2013) The Dreyfus affair. The story of the most infamous miscarriage of justice on French history. Bloomsbury Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinach J (1903–1911) Histoire de l’Affaire Dreyfus. Librairie Charpentier et Fasquelle, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Rémond R (1982) Les droites en France. Aubier, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Rioux J-P (1977) Nationalisme et conservatisme. La Ligue de la patrie française, 1899-1904. Bauchesne, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorlin P (1966) Waldeck-Rousseau. Colin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternhell Z (1972) Maurice Barrès et le nationalisme français. Presses de Sciences Po, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternhell Z (1978) La Droite révolutionnaire: 1885–1914. Les origines françaises du fascisme. Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas M (1961) L’affaire sans Dreyfus. Fayard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandromme P (1965) Maurras. L’Eglise de l’ordre. Centurion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S (1982) Ideology and experience. Antisemitism in France at time of the Dreyfus affair. Littman Library, Toronto

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zola E (1898) J’accuse. Lettre au Président de la République. L’Aurore 13/01

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Budzanowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Budzanowska, A., Pietrzykowski, T. (2020). The Dreyfus Affair and the Rise of Political Religion in France. In: Bunikowski, D., Puppo, A. (eds) Why Religion? Towards a Critical Philosophy of Law, Peace and God. Law and Religion in a Global Context, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35484-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35484-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35483-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35484-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics