Skip to main content

Medical Evaluation of Athletes: Genetic Testing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Textbook of Sports and Exercise Cardiology

Abstract

Sports Cardiology practice commonly involves evaluation of athletes for genetically determined cardiac conditions that predispose to exercise-induced malignant arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Differentiation of “athlete’s heart” from heart disease may be challenging due to the effects of exercise on the electrical and structural cardiac remodeling; prolongation of the QT interval, left ventricular hypertrophy and cavity dilatation create significant overlap between physiology and inherited channelopathies and cardiomyopathies also known as the “grey zone”. Genetic studies over the last 30 years have identified gene abnormalities that underpin these conditions. In addition, technological advances have made genetic testing a more readily available and cheaper tool, raising questions relating to its exact role in the investigation of athletes. Before considering genetic testing, the athlete should have appropriate genetic counselling relating to the potential implications of the result on the athlete and their family, as well as the challenges and limitations of the testing. Genetic testing in an athlete can have diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications, including guiding exercise recommendations. The yield of genetic testing varies depending on the condition under assessment and importantly, is significantly lower for athletes with borderline phenotypes (“grey zone”). Genetic testing results are not binary but there is a probabilistic spectrum of pathogenicity. To avoid confusion, accurate assessment of the information is required by individuals with expertise in cardio-genetics, using established scoring criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackerman MJ, Priori SG, Willems S, Berul C, Brugada R, Calkins H, et al. HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies this document was developed as a partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(8):1308–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Priori SG, Wilde AA, Horie M, Cho Y, Behr ER, Berul C, et al. HRS/EHRA/APHRS expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of patients with inherited primary arrhythmia syndromes: document endorsed by HRS, EHRA, and APHRS in May 2013 and by ACCF, AHA, PACES, and AEPC in June 2013. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(12):1932–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Semsarian C, Ingles J. Determining pathogenicity in cardiac genetic testing: filling in the blank spaces. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2015;25(7):653–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ingles J, Semsarian C. The value of cardiac genetic testing. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2014;24(6):217–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miles C, Finocchiaro G, Papadakis M, Gray B, Westaby J, Ensam B, et al. Sudden death and left ventricular involvement in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2019;139:1786.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Maron BJ, Haas TS, Ahluwalia A, Murphy CJ, Garberich RF. Demographics and epidemiology of sudden deaths in young competitive athletes: from the United States National Registry. Am J Med. 2016;129(11):1170–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harmon KG, Asif IM, Maleszewski JJ, Owens DS, Prutkin JM, Salerno JC, et al. Incidence and etiology of sudden cardiac arrest and death in high school athletes in the United States. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(11):1493–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Finocchiaro G, Papadakis M, Robertus JL, Dhutia H, Steriotis AK, Tome M, et al. Etiology of sudden death in sports: insights from a united kingdom regional registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(18):2108–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazzanti A, Maragna R, Vacanti G, Monteforte N, Bloise R, Marino M, et al. Interplay between genetic substrate, QTc duration, and arrhythmia risk in patients with long QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(15):1663–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. James CA, Bhonsale A, Tichnell C, Murray B, Russell SD, Tandri H, et al. Exercise increases age-related penetrance and arrhythmic risk in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy-associated desmosomal mutation carriers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(14):1290–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pelliccia A, Solberg EE, Papadakis M, Adami PE, Biffi A, Caselli S, et al. Recommendations for participation in competitive and leisure time sport in athletes with cardiomyopathies, myocarditis, and pericarditis: position statement of the Sport Cardiology Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). Eur Heart J. 2019;40(1):19–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ingles J, Yeates L, Semsarian C. The emerging role of the cardiac genetic counselor. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(12):1958–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gray B, Behr ER. New insights into the genetic basis of inherited arrhythmia syndromes. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016;9(6):569–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kapplinger JD, Giudicessi JR, Ye D, Tester DJ, Callis TE, Valdivia CR, et al. Enhanced classification of Brugada Syndrome-associated and long-QT syndrome-associated genetic variants in the SCN5A-encoded Na(v)1.5 cardiac sodium channel. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2015;8(4):582–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Rehm HL. Disease-targeted sequencing: a cornerstone in the clinic. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14(4):295–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ackerman MJ. Genetic purgatory and the cardiac channelopathies: exposing the variants of uncertain/unknown significance issue. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(11):2325–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel RY, Shah N, Jackson AR, Ghosh R, Pawliczek P, Paithankar S, et al. ClinGen pathogenicity calculator: a configurable system for assessing pathogenicity of genetic variants. Genome Med. 2017;9(1):3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Burns C, Bagnall RD, Lam L, Semsarian C, Ingles J. Multiple gene variants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the era of next-generation sequencing. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2017;10(4):e001666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alfares AA, Kelly MA, McDermott G, Funke BH, Lebo MS, Baxter SB, et al. Results of clinical genetic testing of 2,912 probands with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: expanded panels offer limited additional sensitivity. Genet Med. 2015;17(11):880–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Authors/Task Force m, Elliott PM, Anastasakis A, Borger MA, Borggrefe M, Cecchi F, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35(39):2733–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Akhtar M, Elliott P. The genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2018;2018(3):36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ingles J, Sarina T, Yeates L, Hunt L, Macciocca I, McCormack L, et al. Clinical predictors of genetic testing outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Genet Med. 2013;15(12):972–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gollob MH, Green MS, Tang AS, Roberts R. PRKAG2 cardiac syndrome: familial ventricular preexcitation, conduction system disease, and cardiac hypertrophy. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2002;17(3):229–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gandjbakhch E, Redheuil A, Pousset F, Charron P, Frank R. Clinical diagnosis, imaging, and genetics of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(7):784–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, Basso C, Bauce B, Bluemke DA, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the task force criteria. Circulation. 2010;121(13):1533–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Papadakis M, Carre F, Kervio G, Rawlins J, Panoulas VF, Chandra N, et al. The prevalence, distribution, and clinical outcomes of electrocardiographic repolarization patterns in male athletes of African/Afro-Caribbean origin. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(18):2304–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brosnan MJ, Claessen G, Heidbuchel H, Prior DL, La Gerche A. Right precordial T-wave inversion in healthy endurance athletes can be explained by lateral displacement of the cardiac apex. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;1(1-2):84–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Malhotra A, Dhutia H, Gati S, Yeo TJ, Dores H, Bastiaenen R, et al. Anterior T-wave inversion in young white athletes and nonathletes: prevalence and significance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(1):1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zaidi A, Ghani S, Sharma R, Oxborough D, Panoulas VF, Sheikh N, et al. Physiological right ventricular adaptation in elite athletes of African and Afro-Caribbean origin. Circulation. 2013;127(17):1783–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. D’Ascenzi F, Anselmi F, Piu P, Fiorentini C, Carbone SF, Volterrani L, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance normal reference values of biventricular size and function in male athlete’s heart. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1755.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Corrado D, Link MS, Calkins H. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(1):61–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruwald AC, Marcus F, Estes NA III, Link M, McNitt S, Polonsky B, et al. Association of competitive and recreational sport participation with cardiac events in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: results from the North American multidisciplinary study of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(27):1735–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Weintraub RG, Semsarian C, Macdonald P. Dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2017;390(10092):400–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Peters S, Kumar S, Elliott P, Kalman JM, Fatkin D. Arrhythmic genotypes in familial dilated cardiomyopathy: implications for genetic testing and clinical management. Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(1):31–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Haas J, Frese KS, Peil B, Kloos W, Keller A, Nietsch R, et al. Atlas of the clinical genetics of human dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(18):1123–35a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gati S, Papadakis M, Papamichael ND, Zaidi A, Sheikh N, Reed M, et al. Reversible de novo left ventricular trabeculations in pregnant women: implications for the diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction in low-risk populations. Circulation. 2014;130(6):475–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Miller EM, Hinton RB, Czosek R, Lorts A, Parrott A, Shikany AR, et al. Genetic testing in pediatric left ventricular noncompaction. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2017;10(6):e001735.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sheikh N, Papadakis M, Wilson M, Malhotra A, Adamuz C, Homfray T, et al. Diagnostic yield of genetic testing in young athletes with T-wave inversion. Circulation. 2018;138(12):1184–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Schwartz PJ, Stramba-Badiale M, Crotti L, Pedrazzini M, Besana A, Bosi G, et al. Prevalence of the congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2009;120(18):1761–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Schwartz PJ, Crotti L. QTc behavior during exercise and genetic testing for the long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2011;124(20):2181–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tanriverdi H, Kaftan HA, Evrengul H, Dursunoglu D, Turgut G, Kilic M. QT dispersion and left ventricular hypertrophy in athletes: relationship with angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D polymorphism. Acta Cardiol. 2005;60(4):387–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Basavarajaiah S, Wilson M, Whyte G, Shah A, Behr E, Sharma S. Prevalence and significance of an isolated long QT interval in elite athletes. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(23):2944–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schwartz PJ, Ackerman MJ, George AL Jr, Wilde AAM. Impact of genetics on the clinical management of channelopathies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(3):169–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Mazzanti A, Maragna R, Faragli A, Monteforte N, Bloise R, Memmi M, et al. Gene-specific therapy with mexiletine reduces arrhythmic events in patients with long QT syndrome type 3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(9):1053–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Priori SG, Chen SR. Inherited dysfunction of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ handling and arrhythmogenesis. Circ Res. 2011;108(7):871–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Gray B, Bagnall RD, Lam L, Ingles J, Turner C, Haan E, et al. A novel heterozygous mutation in cardiac calsequestrin causes autosomal dominant catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(8):1652–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Antzelevitch C, Yan GX, Ackerman MJ, Borggrefe M, Corrado D, Guo J, et al. J-wave syndromes expert consensus conference report: emerging concepts and gaps in knowledge. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(10):e295–324.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bezzina CR, Barc J, Mizusawa Y, Remme CA, Gourraud JB, Simonet F, et al. Common variants at SCN5A-SCN10A and HEY2 are associated with Brugada syndrome, a rare disease with high risk of sudden cardiac death. Nat Genet. 2013;45(9):1044–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Yamagata K, Horie M, Aiba T, Ogawa S, Aizawa Y, Ohe T, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation of SCN5A mutation for the clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics of probands with Brugada syndrome: a Japanese multicenter registry. Circulation. 2017;135(23):2255–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bezzina C, Veldkamp MW, van Den Berg MP, Postma AV, Rook MB, Viersma JW, et al. A single Na(+) channel mutation causing both long-QT and Brugada syndromes. Circ Res. 1999;85(12):1206–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Makita N, Behr E, Shimizu W, Horie M, Sunami A, Crotti L, et al. The E1784K mutation in SCN5A is associated with mixed clinical phenotype of type 3 long QT syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(6):2219–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Mazzanti A, Kanthan A, Monteforte N, Memmi M, Bloise R, Novelli V, et al. Novel insight into the natural history of short QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(13):1300–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Giustetto C, Schimpf R, Mazzanti A, Scrocco C, Maury P, Anttonen O, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with short QT syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(6):587–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bagnall RD, Weintraub RG, Ingles J, Duflou J, Yeates L, Lam L, et al. A prospective study of sudden cardiac death among children and young adults. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(25):2441–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lahrouchi N, Raju H, Lodder EM, Papatheodorou E, Ware JS, Papadakis M, et al. Utility of post-mortem genetic testing in cases of sudden arrhythmic death syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(17):2134–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Basso C, Aguilera B, Banner J, Cohle S, d’Amati G, de Gouveia RH, et al. Guidelines for autopsy investigation of sudden cardiac death: 2017 update from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology. Virchows Arch. 2017;471(6):691–705.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Turkowski KL, Bos JM, Ackerman NC, Rohatgi RK, Ackerman MJ. Return-to-play for athletes with genetic heart diseases. Circulation. 2018;137(10):1086–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ackerman MJ, Zipes DP, Kovacs RJ, Maron BJ. Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: task force 10: the cardiac channelopathies: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(21):2424–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Maron BJ, Maron MS, Semsarian C. Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after 20 years: clinical perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(8):705–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Papadakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Review

Review

1.1 Questions

  1. 1.

    An 18-year-old professional football player is identified to have a QTc of 490 ms on ECG screening. Which of the following statements is true regarding genetic testing?

    1. a.

      A variant of uncertain significance in KCNQ1 (LQT1) is an indication to commence betablocker therapy

    2. b.

      Genetic testing in this athlete has no prognostic value as the QTc is <500 ms

    3. c.

      Genetic testing is not recommended as the diagnosis is not confirmed

    4. d.

      Genetic testing with a long QT panel may help to differentiate congenital long QT syndrome from athletic ECG adaptation

    5. e.

      The athlete should defer genetic testing to prevent disqualification from competitive football

  2. 2.

    A 45-year-old man presents following the unexplained sudden death of his younger brother on the football field, aged 35 years old. The deceased had undergone a negative postmortem and DNA was stored. Which of the following statements is true?

    1. a.

      Genetic testing for inherited arrhythmia syndromes can be considered in the deceased’s DNA

    2. b.

      Genetic testing for inherited arrhythmia syndromes is indicated in the living 45-year-old brother

    3. c.

      Genetic testing should be performed in the brother and the deceased proband DNA concurrently

    4. d.

      Genetic testing should not be considered in the deceased’s DNA as the postmortem is negative

    5. e.

      The DNA should be stored for research in the future, but no genetic testing should be performed at present

  3. 3.

    Which of the following statements regarding cascade family genetic testing is correct for an athlete with a diagnosis of HCM?

    1. a.

      All family members who undergo negative clinical screening based on ECG and echo should be referred for diagnostic genetic testing.

    2. b.

      First degree family members should be offered extensive genetic panel testing regardless of presence or absence of symptomatology

    3. c.

      First degree family members with cardiac symptoms or signs suggestive of HCM should be offered extensive genetic panel testing

    4. d.

      If a likely pathogenic variant is found in the athlete, targeted (predictive) genetic testing of all first-degree family members is recommended

    5. e.

      If a VUS is found in the athlete, genetic testing of all first-degree family members is recommended to determine its significance

1.2 Answers

  1. 1.

    D: In an athlete with borderline QTc prolongation (480–500 ms), genetic testing for LQT 1–3 may assist in clarifying the diagnosis. In addition, by confirming the diagnosis in the athlete potentially lifesaving betablocker therapy can be initiated.

    A is not correct as variants of uncertain significance should not lead to an alteration in athlete’s management [1].

    B is not correct, data shows the greater the QTc interval the higher the potential risk to the individual [10].

    C is not correct, genetic testing is indicated in this situation as it can assist in confirming the diagnosis [1].

    E is not correct, genetic testing can help facilitate appropriate therapy and return to play [58, 59].

  2. 2.

    A: HRS/EHRA guidelines state that an arrhythmia syndrome focused post mortem genetic testing “molecular autopsy” can be considered (Class IIa) [1].

    B is not correct, if DNA is stored on the deceased (the proband) then genetic testing should be initiated in them in the first instance. The brother should undergo clinical screening, and if there is evidence in him of an inherited cardiac condition then directed genetic testing can be ordered.

    C is not correct, usually the testing is initiated in the proband in the first instance (as above).

    D is not correct, a number of inherited cardiac conditions may present with sudden death as the first symptom, particularly channelopathies which are associated with a structurally normal heart [56].

    E is not correct, if DNA is stored then genetic testing for molecular autopsy should be initiated especially as the inherited cardiac conditions are autosomal dominant and therefore first degree family members have a 50% chance of having the same condition [1, 56].

  3. 3.

    D: Class I indication in EHRA/HRS guidelines with regards to genetic screening of first-degree relatives following a pathogenic variant being identified in an individual with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    A/B/C are not correct as genetic testing should not be performed in family members in the first instance without a genetic diagnosis in the index case, independent of symptomatology. Clinical testing should be performed in all first-degree family members. The proband (i.e. the first person diagnosed in the family) is tested first whenever possible, and predictive testing is only offered to family members for likely pathogenic or pathogenic variants. Therefore, only the athlete should be tested genetically for known HCM genes in the first instance. If an actionable gene result is identified in the athlete this can then be used for predictive testing in the first-degree family members, independent of their clinical phenotyping.

    E is not correct. A variant of uncertain significance is not an actionable genetic variant [4].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gray, B., Papadakis, M. (2020). Medical Evaluation of Athletes: Genetic Testing. In: Pressler, A., Niebauer, J. (eds) Textbook of Sports and Exercise Cardiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35374-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35374-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35373-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35374-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics