Skip to main content

Predictive Regret-Matching for Cooperating Interceptors to Defeat an Advanced Threat

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI 2019: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11919))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Threats combining kinematic superiority, high-g maneuvering and evasive capabilities are in development. These advanced threats can reduce the survivability of high-value assets (HVAs). Here, we demonstrates that it is possible to defeat such an advanced threat with cheaper lower-performance interceptors using an alternative approach to traditional optimal control. These interceptors harness the knowledge of the forecasted regions that the threat can access, referred to as threat reachability. Applying reachability, the interceptors can be organized to block the passage of the threat to the HVAs as well as to defeat it. Here, we have developed a reachability calculator that is scalable to accommodate multiple interceptors and combined it with an on-line regret-matching learner derived from game theory to produce the self-organization and guidance for the interceptors. Numerical simulations are provided to demonstrate the validity of the resulting solution. Furthermore, some comparison is provided to benchmark our approach against a recently published differential game solution on the same scenarios. The comparison shows that our algorithm outperforms the optimal control solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Speier, R.H., Nacouzi, G., Lee, C., Moore, R.M.: Hypersonic Missile Nonproliferation: Hindering the Spread of a New Class of Weapons. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Su, W., Shin, H.-S., Chen, L., Tsourdos, A.: Cooperative interception strategy for multiple inferior missiles against one highly maneuvering target. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 80, 91–100 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weibo, S., Sixin, L., Yu, X., Sen, L.: Laser lethality of hypersonic vehicles under aero-heating. High Power Laser Part. Beams 22(6), 1215–1218 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karako, T.: Missile Defense and Defeat: Considerations for the New Policy Review. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Palumbo, N.F., Blauwkamp, R.A., Lloyd, J.M.: Modern homing missile guidance theory and techniques. Johns Hopkins APL Tech. Digest 29(1), 42–59 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen, D.D., Rajagopalan, A., Kim, J., Lim, C.C.: Adaptive regret minimization for learning complex team-based tactics. IEEE Access 7, 103019–103030 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sergiu, H., Andreu, M.-C.: Simple Adaptive Strategies: From Regret-Matching to Uncoupled Dynamics, vol. 4. World Scientific, Singapore (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Yanushevsky, R.: Modern Missile Guidance. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohlmeyer, E.J., Phillips, C.A.: Generalized vector explicit guidance. J. Guidance Control Dyn. 29(2), 261–268 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Robb, M., White, B.A., Tsourdos, A., Rulloda, D.: Reachability guidance: a novel concept to improve mid-course guidance. In: Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, pp. 339–345. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen, D.D., Rajagopalan, A., Lim, C.-C.: Online versus offline reinforcement learning for false target control against known threat. In: Chen, Z., Mendes, A., Yan, Y., Chen, S. (eds.) ICIRA 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10985, pp. 400–412. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97589-4_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arvind Rajagopalan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rajagopalan, A., Nguyen, D.D., Kim, J. (2019). Predictive Regret-Matching for Cooperating Interceptors to Defeat an Advanced Threat. In: Liu, J., Bailey, J. (eds) AI 2019: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11919. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35288-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35288-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35287-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35288-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics