Skip to main content

Intoxication and Harm Reduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cultures of Intoxication
  • 2119 Accesses

Abstract

Any use of substances to produce intoxication carries with it the potential for harm. However, intoxication is something that many people will experience in their lives, and for the majority, intoxication will carry with it both pleasure and pain: pleasure because intoxication can facilitate an enhanced sense of enjoyment, pain because often intoxication has ‘morning after’ impact where physical and emotional pain occurs. Harm, in these cases, is fleeting and relatively benign and is often outweighed by pleasure. However, there are people for whom intoxication is regular and is culpable in creating serious harms for the individual, their families and their communities. In those situations, many societies now offer services and interventions which are aimed at reducing substance-related harms. This chapter examines harm reduction, looking at the concept, development and focus of harm reduction from a number of perspectives. It looks at the manner in which harm reduction has evolved from a clinical intervention for intravenous drug users, branched out into advice on ‘safe use’ for recreational substance users and is increasingly being used as a political vehicle to begin to challenge some of the structural factors associated with problematic substance use at community level. It notes that increasingly harm reduction is in the vanguard of the decriminalisation and legalisation of formerly hitherto proscribed substances. It concludes by asking questions of how much further harm reduction will go in reshaping local, national and global drug policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Peanut Pete was a cartoon character created by the Manchester Lifeline Project. He was a recreationaldrug user who often pushed his use of the drug little bit too far. The cartoons were amusing but had a serious message, aimed specifically at a certain type of substance user.

References

  • Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. (1988). Aids and drugs misuse. London: ACMD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arps, F. S. E., & Golichenko, M. (2014). Sex workers unite! Litigating for sex worker’s freedom of association in Russia. Health and Human Rights Journal, 16, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babor, T. F., Caulkins, J. P., Edwards, G., Fischer, B., Foxcroft, D. R., Humphreys, K., …, Reuter, P. (2010). Drug policy and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, A. (2009). Drugs, intoxication and society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2012). On touching – The inhuman therefore I am. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 23(3), 801–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. (2011). Illicit drugs: Use and control (2nd ed.). Routledge: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A., & Johns, N. (2013). The policy making process in the criminal justice system. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1967). History, Culture and Subjective Experience: An exploration of the social bases of drug-induced experiences. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 8(3), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, T., & Holloway, K. (2005). Understanding drugs, alcohol and crime. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, S. (1987). Recession, crime and punishment. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S., & Schaefer, N. (Eds.). (2009). Syringe exchange programs around the world: The global context. Gay Men’s Health Crisis. Retrieved from September 9, 2018, from http://www.gmhc.org/files/editor/file/gmhc_intl_seps.pdf

  • Camilleri, A. M., & Caldicott, D. (2005). Underground pill testing, down under. Forensic Science International, 151(1), 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomber, R., Moyle, L., & South, N. (2016). The normalisation of drug supply: The social supply of drugs as the “other side” of the history of normalisation. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23(3), 255–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. J., Lopez, A. M., & Kral, A. H. (2018). Using drugs in un/safe spaces: Impact of perceived illegality on and underground supervised injecting facility in the USA. International Journal of Drug Policy, 53, 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, E., Alcabes, P. G., & Marx, P. A. (2001). The injection century: Massive unsterile injections and the rise of human pathogens. The Lancet, 358(9297), 1989–1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G. (2005). Matters of substance: Drugs: Is legalization the right answer – Or the wrong question? Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, T. A., & McAtee, M. J. (2006). Behavioral science at the crossroads in public health: Extending horizons, envisioning the future. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1650–1671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, S. F., Pettianti, H. M., O’Malley, S., Randall, P. K., & Randall, C. L. (2010). Gender differences in alcohol treatment: An analysis of outcome from the COMBINE Study. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 34(10), 1803–1812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, C., Bengry-Howell, A., Hackley, C., Mistral, W., & Szmigin, I. (2009). “Every time I do it I absolutely annihilate myself”: Loss of (self)consciousness and loss of memory in young people’s drinking narratives. Sociology, 43(3), 457–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harm Reduction International. (2018). Home Page. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from www.hri.global

  • Inciardi, J. A. (1999). Harm reduction: National and international perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler, D. (2001). Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: An application to Swiss drug policy, in. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 623–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leechaianan, Y., & Longmire, D. (2013). The use of the death penalty for drug trafficking in the United States, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand: A comparative legal analysis. Laws, 2(2), 115–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P. (Ed.). (2007). Drugs and popular culture. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2008). Expertise, truth and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s ‘four pillars’ drug strategy. Environment and Planning, 40, 885–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSmith, A. (2010). No such thing as society. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Measham, F., & Brain, K. (2005). ‘Binge’ drinking, British alcohol policy and the new culture of intoxication. Crime, Media, Culture: An international journal, 1(3), 263–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Measham, F. C. (2019). Drug safety testing, disposals and dealing in an English field: Exploring the operational and behavioural outcomes of the UK’s first onsite ‘drug checking’ service. International Journal of Drug Policy, 67, 102–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S., in Warnock, M. (1962). Utilitarianism and on liberty. London: Fontana Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, F. (2017). Glasgow, Scotland tackling injection of drugs in public spaces through the introduction of safer facilities. The Lancet, 4, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D., & Dietze, P. (2005). Enabling environments and the reduction of drug-related harm: Re-framing Australian policy and practice. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24(3), 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D., & Dietze, P. (2008). Drugs and public health: Australian perspectives on policy. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muggah, R. (2017). Duterte’s drug war in the Philippines is out of control, he needs to be stopped, The Guardian. Retrieved June 18, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/jan/05/rodrigo-dutertes-drug-war-in-the-philippines-is-out-of-control-he-needs-to-be-stopped

  • New Zealand Ministry of Health. (2018). National drug policy 2015–2020. Retrieved August 23, 2018, from https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/national-drug-policy-2015-2020

  • Nutt, D. (2015). quoted in an interview with PI Media (UCL student media). Retrieved September 26, 2018, from https://pimediaonline.co.uk/investigation/legalise-it-an-interview-with-professor-david-nutt-on-uk-drug-policy/

  • Nutt, D., King, L. A., Saulsbury, W., & Blakemore, C. (2007). The development of a rational scale to assess the harms of drugs of potential misuse. Health Policy, 369(9566), 1047–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, H., Aldridge, J., & Measham, F. (1997). Illegal leisure. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, T. (2009). Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm. In International Journal of Drug Policy (Vol. 20, pp. 193–201).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. R., Bucknall, A. B. V., Welsby, P. D., & Roberts, J. J. K. (1986). Epidemic of AIDS related virus (HLTV 3/LAZ) infection among intravenous drug users. British Medical Journal. (Clinical research ed.), 292(6519), 527–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roe, G. (2005). Harm reduction as paradigm: Is better than bad good enough? The origins of harm reduction. Critical Public Health, 15(3), 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. (2007). The philosophy of wine. In J. Robinson & B. C. Smith (Eds.), Questions of taste: The philosophy of wine. Oxford: Signal Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silbert, M. H., Pines, A. M., & Lynch, T. (1982). Substance abuse and prostitution. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 14(3), 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. B. (1990). The contagious diseases acts reconsidered. Social History of Medicine, 3(2), 197–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stimpson, G. V. (2010). Harm reduction: Moving through the third decade. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 21(2), 91–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1996). John Stuart Mill and pornography: Beyond the harm principle. Ethics, 106(3), 621–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, C. (2019). Michael Gove: A cocaine party – Then an anti-drugs article. The Times. Retrieved June 14, 2019, from https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/backers-rally-around-contrite-michael-gove-after-cocaine-confession-l873hqzp8

  • Wilding, M. (2017). How the UK’s music festivals changed their tune on drugs. The Vice. Retrieved August 14, 2018, from https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/gybgeb/how-the-uks-music-festivals-changed-their-tune-on-drugs-safe-sesh

  • Winnifrith, T. (1994). Fallen women in the nineteenth-century novel. London: St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation. (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion. Retrieved August 8, 2018, from http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/

  • World Health Organisation. (2018). People who inject drugs. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from www.who.int

  • Wright, M. (2006, August 11). Exchanging views of needle exchange. The Pharmaceutical Journal. Retrieved August 11, 2006, from https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/PJ,-August-2006/315.issue

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Barton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barton, A. (2020). Intoxication and Harm Reduction. In: Hutton, F. (eds) Cultures of Intoxication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35284-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35284-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35283-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35284-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics