Abstract
Any use of substances to produce intoxication carries with it the potential for harm. However, intoxication is something that many people will experience in their lives, and for the majority, intoxication will carry with it both pleasure and pain: pleasure because intoxication can facilitate an enhanced sense of enjoyment, pain because often intoxication has ‘morning after’ impact where physical and emotional pain occurs. Harm, in these cases, is fleeting and relatively benign and is often outweighed by pleasure. However, there are people for whom intoxication is regular and is culpable in creating serious harms for the individual, their families and their communities. In those situations, many societies now offer services and interventions which are aimed at reducing substance-related harms. This chapter examines harm reduction, looking at the concept, development and focus of harm reduction from a number of perspectives. It looks at the manner in which harm reduction has evolved from a clinical intervention for intravenous drug users, branched out into advice on ‘safe use’ for recreational substance users and is increasingly being used as a political vehicle to begin to challenge some of the structural factors associated with problematic substance use at community level. It notes that increasingly harm reduction is in the vanguard of the decriminalisation and legalisation of formerly hitherto proscribed substances. It concludes by asking questions of how much further harm reduction will go in reshaping local, national and global drug policies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Peanut Pete was a cartoon character created by the Manchester Lifeline Project. He was a recreationaldrug user who often pushed his use of the drug little bit too far. The cartoons were amusing but had a serious message, aimed specifically at a certain type of substance user.
References
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. (1988). Aids and drugs misuse. London: ACMD.
Akers, R. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. New York: Routledge.
Arps, F. S. E., & Golichenko, M. (2014). Sex workers unite! Litigating for sex worker’s freedom of association in Russia. Health and Human Rights Journal, 16, 2.
Babor, T. F., Caulkins, J. P., Edwards, G., Fischer, B., Foxcroft, D. R., Humphreys, K., …, Reuter, P. (2010). Drug policy and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bancroft, A. (2009). Drugs, intoxication and society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. (2012). On touching – The inhuman therefore I am. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 23(3), 801–831.
Barton, A. (2011). Illicit drugs: Use and control (2nd ed.). Routledge: London.
Barton, A., & Johns, N. (2013). The policy making process in the criminal justice system. London: Routledge.
Becker, H. (1967). History, Culture and Subjective Experience: An exploration of the social bases of drug-induced experiences. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 8(3), 163–176.
Bennett, T., & Holloway, K. (2005). Understanding drugs, alcohol and crime. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Box, S. (1987). Recession, crime and punishment. London: Macmillan.
Cahill, S., & Schaefer, N. (Eds.). (2009). Syringe exchange programs around the world: The global context. Gay Men’s Health Crisis. Retrieved from September 9, 2018, from http://www.gmhc.org/files/editor/file/gmhc_intl_seps.pdf
Camilleri, A. M., & Caldicott, D. (2005). Underground pill testing, down under. Forensic Science International, 151(1), 53–58.
Coomber, R., Moyle, L., & South, N. (2016). The normalisation of drug supply: The social supply of drugs as the “other side” of the history of normalisation. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23(3), 255–263.
Davidson, P. J., Lopez, A. M., & Kral, A. H. (2018). Using drugs in un/safe spaces: Impact of perceived illegality on and underground supervised injecting facility in the USA. International Journal of Drug Policy, 53, 47–54.
Drucker, E., Alcabes, P. G., & Marx, P. A. (2001). The injection century: Massive unsterile injections and the rise of human pathogens. The Lancet, 358(9297), 1989–1992.
Edwards, G. (2005). Matters of substance: Drugs: Is legalization the right answer – Or the wrong question? Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Glass, T. A., & McAtee, M. J. (2006). Behavioral science at the crossroads in public health: Extending horizons, envisioning the future. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1650–1671.
Greenfield, S. F., Pettianti, H. M., O’Malley, S., Randall, P. K., & Randall, C. L. (2010). Gender differences in alcohol treatment: An analysis of outcome from the COMBINE Study. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 34(10), 1803–1812.
Griffin, C., Bengry-Howell, A., Hackley, C., Mistral, W., & Szmigin, I. (2009). “Every time I do it I absolutely annihilate myself”: Loss of (self)consciousness and loss of memory in young people’s drinking narratives. Sociology, 43(3), 457–476.
Harm Reduction International. (2018). Home Page. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from www.hri.global
Inciardi, J. A. (1999). Harm reduction: National and international perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kubler, D. (2001). Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework: An application to Swiss drug policy, in. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 623–641.
Leechaianan, Y., & Longmire, D. (2013). The use of the death penalty for drug trafficking in the United States, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand: A comparative legal analysis. Laws, 2(2), 115–149.
Manning, P. (Ed.). (2007). Drugs and popular culture. Cullompton: Willan.
McCann, E. (2008). Expertise, truth and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s ‘four pillars’ drug strategy. Environment and Planning, 40, 885–904.
McSmith, A. (2010). No such thing as society. London: Constable.
Measham, F., & Brain, K. (2005). ‘Binge’ drinking, British alcohol policy and the new culture of intoxication. Crime, Media, Culture: An international journal, 1(3), 263–284.
Measham, F. C. (2019). Drug safety testing, disposals and dealing in an English field: Exploring the operational and behavioural outcomes of the UK’s first onsite ‘drug checking’ service. International Journal of Drug Policy, 67, 102–107.
Mill, J. S., in Warnock, M. (1962). Utilitarianism and on liberty. London: Fontana Library.
Mitchell, F. (2017). Glasgow, Scotland tackling injection of drugs in public spaces through the introduction of safer facilities. The Lancet, 4, 4.
Moore, D., & Dietze, P. (2005). Enabling environments and the reduction of drug-related harm: Re-framing Australian policy and practice. Drug and Alcohol Review, 24(3), 275–284.
Moore, D., & Dietze, P. (2008). Drugs and public health: Australian perspectives on policy. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Muggah, R. (2017). Duterte’s drug war in the Philippines is out of control, he needs to be stopped, The Guardian. Retrieved June 18, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2017/jan/05/rodrigo-dutertes-drug-war-in-the-philippines-is-out-of-control-he-needs-to-be-stopped
New Zealand Ministry of Health. (2018). National drug policy 2015–2020. Retrieved August 23, 2018, from https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/national-drug-policy-2015-2020
Nutt, D. (2015). quoted in an interview with PI Media (UCL student media). Retrieved September 26, 2018, from https://pimediaonline.co.uk/investigation/legalise-it-an-interview-with-professor-david-nutt-on-uk-drug-policy/
Nutt, D., King, L. A., Saulsbury, W., & Blakemore, C. (2007). The development of a rational scale to assess the harms of drugs of potential misuse. Health Policy, 369(9566), 1047–1053.
Parker, H., Aldridge, J., & Measham, F. (1997). Illegal leisure. London: Routledge.
Rhodes, T. (2009). Risk environments and drug harms: A social science for harm. In International Journal of Drug Policy (Vol. 20, pp. 193–201).
Robertson, J. R., Bucknall, A. B. V., Welsby, P. D., & Roberts, J. J. K. (1986). Epidemic of AIDS related virus (HLTV 3/LAZ) infection among intravenous drug users. British Medical Journal. (Clinical research ed.), 292(6519), 527–529.
Roe, G. (2005). Harm reduction as paradigm: Is better than bad good enough? The origins of harm reduction. Critical Public Health, 15(3), 243–250.
Scruton, R. (2007). The philosophy of wine. In J. Robinson & B. C. Smith (Eds.), Questions of taste: The philosophy of wine. Oxford: Signal Books.
Silbert, M. H., Pines, A. M., & Lynch, T. (1982). Substance abuse and prostitution. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 14(3), 193–197.
Smith, F. B. (1990). The contagious diseases acts reconsidered. Social History of Medicine, 3(2), 197–215.
Stimpson, G. V. (2010). Harm reduction: Moving through the third decade. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 21(2), 91–93.
Vernon, R. (1996). John Stuart Mill and pornography: Beyond the harm principle. Ethics, 106(3), 621–632.
Wheeler, C. (2019). Michael Gove: A cocaine party – Then an anti-drugs article. The Times. Retrieved June 14, 2019, from https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/backers-rally-around-contrite-michael-gove-after-cocaine-confession-l873hqzp8
Wilding, M. (2017). How the UK’s music festivals changed their tune on drugs. The Vice. Retrieved August 14, 2018, from https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/gybgeb/how-the-uks-music-festivals-changed-their-tune-on-drugs-safe-sesh
Winnifrith, T. (1994). Fallen women in the nineteenth-century novel. London: St. Martin’s Press.
World Health Organisation. (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion. Retrieved August 8, 2018, from http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/
World Health Organisation. (2018). People who inject drugs. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from www.who.int
Wright, M. (2006, August 11). Exchanging views of needle exchange. The Pharmaceutical Journal. Retrieved August 11, 2006, from https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/PJ,-August-2006/315.issue
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barton, A. (2020). Intoxication and Harm Reduction. In: Hutton, F. (eds) Cultures of Intoxication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35284-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35284-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35283-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35284-4
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)