Skip to main content

Abstract

In Multi Criteria Decision Making with linguistic variables, the DMs may have vague information, limited attention and different information processing capabilities. This paper proposes a new fuzzy decision making method which allows fuzzy preferences in linguistic terms for alternative selection. The approach is computationally simple and its underlying concept is logical and comprehensible, thus facilitating its implementation in a computer-based system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lu, J., Zhang, G., Ruan, D., Wu, F.: Multi-Objective Group Decision Making. Methods, Software and Applications with Fuzzy Set Techniques. Series in Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 6. Imperial College Press, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zeleny, M.: Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, New York (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Roy, B.: Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Roy, B., Berlier, B.: La Metode ELECTRE II. In: Sixieme Conference on Internationale de Rechearche Operationelle, Dublin (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, W.-C., Chen, C.-H.: Using the electre ii method to apply and analyze the differentiation theory. In: Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, vol. 5, pp. 2237–2249 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 186, pp. 20–41. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoon, K.: A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 38(3), 272–286 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 156(2), 445–455 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Opricovic, S.: Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(2), 445–455 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178(2), 514–529 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, W.J., Zeng, L.: A new TOPSIS method for fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making problem. J. Guilin Univ. Electron. Technol. 28(1), 59–62 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Lotfi, F., Hosseinzadeh, I.M.: An algorithmic method to extend TOPSIS for decision-making problems with interval data. Appl. Math. Comput. 175(2), 1375–1384 (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu, H.P., Zhang, G.J., Shao, X.Y.: Study on the application of fuzzy TOPSIS to multiple criteria group decision making problem. Ind. Eng. Manag. 1, 99–102 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Y.M., Elhag, T.M.S.: Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Syst. Appl. 31(2), 309–319 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peide, L., Minghe, W.: An extended VIKOR method for multiple attribute group decision making based on generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Sci. Res. Essays 6(4), 766–776 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vahdani, B., Zandieh, M.: Selecting suppliers using a new fuzzy multiple criteria decision model: the fuzzy balancing and ranking method. Int. J. Prod. Res. 18(15), 5307–5326 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, E.S., Li, R.-J.: Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events. Comput. Math Appl. 15(10), 887–896 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Farina, M., Amato, P.: A fuzzy definition of “optimality” for many-criteria optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 34(3), 315–326 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Borisov, A.N., Alekseyev, A.V., Merkuryeva, G.V., Slyadz, N.N., Gluschkov, V.I.: Fuzzy information processing in decision making systems. Moscow, “Radio i Svyaz” (in Russian) (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akif V. Alizadeh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alizadeh, A.V. (2020). Application of the Fuzzy Optimality Concept to Decision Making. In: Aliev, R., Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W., Jamshidi, M., Babanli, M., Sadikoglu, F. (eds) 10th International Conference on Theory and Application of Soft Computing, Computing with Words and Perceptions - ICSCCW-2019. ICSCCW 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1095. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35249-3_69

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics