Abstract
The Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP) is a trade framework proposed during the meeting of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) in Beijing in 2014, however, proposal was given initially in Hanoi in 2006. It may be considered as manifestation of mega-regionalism in trade, an attempt to set the rules of trade in the twenty-first century at the expense of multilateralism under the auspices of WTO, but also to overcome noodle bowl effect in the Asia-Pacific region. The main objective of the chapter is to study the project of FTAAP, using the concepts of trade regionalism and mega-regionalism, its genesis, economic, and political implications. As indicated by author, next to geographic scope of FTAAP, there is a concern resulting of the fact, that the concept of creating a free trade zone, a de facto mega-regional grouping, does not fully coincide with the concept of regional liberalization based on regulations promoted over the years by APEC and WTO rules. The same applies to the concept of open regionalism underlying the APEC. Author concluded that a hybrid approach and multitiered system might be a solution to enable individual states to proceed with convergence toward higher standards and gains, considering diversity of APEC member states. Alternatively, FTAAP could be made as an evolutionary agreement, while not excluding the possibility of the US membership inside a single framework with China.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ABAC. (2014). Asia-pacific business leaders urge APEC to accelerate the process for achieving a free trade area in the Asia-Pacific region. [online]. Retrieved March 14, 2018, from https://www.apec.org/Press/News-Releases/2014/0508_fta
Aggarwal, V., & Fogarty, E. (2004). Explaining trends in EU interregionalism. In V. Aggarwal & E. Fogarty (Eds.), European union trade strategies: Between globalism and regionalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
APEC. (1994). APEC economic leaders’ declaration of common resolve. [online]. Retrieved February 4, 2018, from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=49492.
APEC. (2018). StatsAPEC. [online]. Retrieved March 1, 2018, from http://statistics.apec.org/.
Basu Das, S. (2014). The political economy of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreements: An ASEAN perspective. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Bhagwati, J. N. (2008). Termites in the trading system: How Preferential agreements undermine free trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bobowski, S. (2017). ASEAN and trade regionalism. An opportunity for convergence or threat of “two speeds”? In Country experiences in economic development, management and entrepreneurship. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Bobowski, S. (2018). Trade regionalism of tomorrow. Entanglement of mega-regionals vs. WTO. In Eurasian economic perspectives. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Camroux, D. (2006). The rise and decline of the Asia-Europe meeting (ASEM): Asymmetric bilateralism and the limitations of interregionalism. In Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 6. Paris: Centre d’études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po.
Hamanaka, S. (2010). Asian regionalism and Japan. London and New York: Routledge.
Meissner, K. L. (2016). A case of failed interregionalism? Analyzing the EU-ASEAN free trade agreement negotiations. Asia Europe Journal, 14, 319–336.
Petri, P. A., Plummer, M. G., & Zhai, F. (2014). The TPP, China and the FTAAP: The case for convergence. In T. Guoqiang & P. A. Petri (Eds.), New directions in Asia-Pacific economic integration. Honolulu: East-West Center.
Ravenhill, J. (2008). The move to preferential trade on the Western Pacific Rim: Some initial conclusions. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 62, 129–150.
Tran, D., & Heal, A. (2014). A free trade area of the Asia-Pacific: Potential pathways to implementation. Trade Insights. Issue no. 4. [pdf]. Retrieved March 14, 2018, from https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/Trade%20Insights%20-%20FTAAP%20-%20Issue%20No.%204.pdf.
WTO. (2018). Regional trade agreements and preferential trade agreements. [online]. Retrieved February 17, 2018, from https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/region_e.htm#facts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bobowski, S. (2020). Contemporary Trade Regionalism on the Example of Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP). In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Karabulut, G., Gözgor, G. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 12/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35040-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35040-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35039-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35040-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)