Skip to main content

Impact of Geological Uncertainty at Different Stages of the Open-Pit Mine Production Planning Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection - MPES 2019 (MPES 2019)

Abstract

This work addresses the long-term open-pit mine production planning. The solution for this problem indicates how and when the ore reserves will be extracted in order to maximize the value of the mining business, generating a promise that commits the mine production over time. Usually, due to the complexity of the problem, the planning process is divided into stages, generating three related problems that are sequentially solved to obtain a tentative production plan, that is: (i) determination of the final pit, which consists of delimiting the subregion of the mine where the extraction will be carried out; (ii) pushbacks selection, that corresponds to a partition of the final pit that allows to guide the sequence of extraction and to control the design; and finally, (iii) temporary production scheduling, which defines when the different zones will be extracted and which of them will be processed.

One of the disadvantages of the traditional methodology is the geological uncertainty is not taken into account, despite the great impact it can have on the production objectives. In this work we show some approaches to incorporate the uncertainty by means of conditional simulations to different stages of production planning, evaluating their impact. The results show that, on one hand, it is possible to increase the expected value of the business, and on the other hand, to reduce the risk of failure to meet production targets, allowing to generate more robust plans. In the case study presented, the results show that it is possible to obtain a discounted expected value increase of 2% and an uncertainty total cost decrease of 69% with respect to the usual methodology, which does not consider the geological uncertainty. Therefore, better decisions could be made in the long-term open pit mine production planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lerchs, H., Grossmann, I.: Optimal design of open-pit mines. Trans. C.I.M. 68, 17–24 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dimitrakopoulos, R., Farrelly, C., Godoy, M.: Moving forward from traditional optimization: grade uncertainty and risk effects in open-pit design. Min. Technol. 111(1), 82–88 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morales, N., Seguel, S., Cáceres, A., Jélvez, E., Alarcón, M.: Incorporation of geometallurgical attributes and geological uncertainty into long-term open-pit mine planning. Minerals 9(2), 108 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Emery, X., Lantuéjoul, C.: TBSIM: a computer program for conditional simulation of three-dimensional Gaussian random fields via the turning bands method. Comput. Geosci. 32(10), 1615–1628 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ravenscroft, P.: Risk analysis for mine scheduling by conditional simulation. Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. Sect. A. Min. Ind. 101, A104–A108 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, M., Dimitrakopoulos, R.: The influence of deposit uncertainty on mine production scheduling. Int. J. Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 13(4), 173–178 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Osanloo, M., Gholamnejad, J., Karimi, B.: Long-term open pit mine production planning: a review of models and algorithms. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ. 22(1), 3–35 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jélvez, E.: Metodología multietapa para la planificación de la producción de largo plazo en minas a rajo abierto bajo incertidumbre geológica. Ph.D. thesis, Departamento de Ingeniería de Minas, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, pp. 1–189 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Godoy, M.: The efficient management of geological risk in long-term production scheduling of open pit mines. Ph.D. thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, pp. 1–256 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dimitrakopoulos, R., Ramazan, S.: Stochastic integer programming for optimising long term production schedules of open pit mines: methods, application and value of stochastic solutions. Min. Technol. 117(4), 155–160 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mai, N.L., Topal, E., Erten, O., Sommerville, B.: A new risk-based optimisation method for the iron ore production scheduling using stochastic integer programming. Resour. Policy 62, 571–579 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jélvez, E., Morales, N., Ortíz, J.M.: Stochastic ultimate pit limit: an efficient Frontier analysis under geological uncertainty (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rockafellar, R., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2, 21–42 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcotte, D., Caron, J.: Ultimate open pit stochastic optimization. Comput. Geosci. 51, 238–246 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jélvez, E., Morales, N., Askari-Nasab, H.: A new model for automated pushback selection. Comput. Oper. Res. (2018, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meagher, C., Dimitrakopoulos, R., Avis, D.: Optimized open pit mine design, pushbacks and the gap problem: a review. J. Min. Sci. 50(3), 508–526 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Enrique Jélvez and Nelson Morales were supported by CONICYT/PIA Project AFB180004 – Advanced Mining Technology Center – Universidad de Chile.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrique Jélvez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jélvez, E., Morales, N., Ortíz, J.M. (2020). Impact of Geological Uncertainty at Different Stages of the Open-Pit Mine Production Planning Process. In: Topal, E. (eds) Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Mine Planning and Equipment Selection - MPES 2019. MPES 2019. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33954-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33954-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33953-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33954-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics