Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Traceability in Engineer-to-Order Businesses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systems Engineering in Research and Industrial Practice

Abstract

A rapidly growing strategy in product design and manufacture, with great potential to improve customer value, is mass-customization. The main idea is to divide the product into modules that can be shared among different product variants. This will support a wide range of options for the end customer to select among, while an internal efficiency, similar to mass-production, can be achieved. This has been a success for many companies acting on the consumer market. However, many manufacturing companies are engineer-to-order (ETO) oriented, such as original equipment suppliers (OES). They design a unique solution, often in close collaboration with other companies. The solution can then be manufactured in different quantities depending on the client’s need. For these companies, there is a strategic need for developing high quality engineering support to further utilize and exploit the information and knowledge produced during product development and to succeed with a strategy influenced by the principles of mass-customization. This has to include the implementation and management of systems enabling highly custom-engineered products to be efficiently designed and manufactured. One challenge when introducing such flexible support is to enable traceability of decisions taken, tasks executed, knowledge used and artefacts developed throughout the whole lifecycle of an individual product. In this chapter, it is shown that traceability can be achieved by introducing support for capturing, structuring and mapping between decisions and resulting outputs, such as geometrical building blocks, knowledge implemented as rules, and the argumentation for the selection, design and specification of these. Three examples are presented where the concept Design Description has been modelled based on an item-oriented, a task-oriented, and a decision-oriented perspective which show the generality of the Design Description concept. The three examples demonstrate how to use the Design Description to enable traceability in platform design, product design, and manufacturing development processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The company used the term product family for their product platform and in this case description these two terms have the same meaning.

References

  1. Hvam L, Mortensen NH, Riis J (2008) Product customization. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hjertberg T, Stolt R, Poorkiany M, Johansson J, Elgh F (2015) Implementation and management of design systems for highly customized products—state of practice and future research. In: Curran R, Wognum N, Borsato M, Stjepandić J, Verhagen WJC (eds) Transdisciplinary lifecycle analysis of systems. Advances in transdisciplinary engineering, vol 2. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 165–174

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biahmou A (2015) Systems engineering. In: Stjepandić J, Wognum N, Verhagen WJC (eds) Concurrent engineering in the 21st century: foundations, developments and challenges. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 221–254

    Google Scholar 

  4. Königs SF, Beier G, Figge A, Stark R (2012) Traceability in systems engineering—review of industrial practices, state-of-the-art technologies and new research solutions. Adv Eng Inform 26:924–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ouertani MZ, Baina S, Gzara L, Morel G (2011) Traceability and management of dispersed product knowledge during design and manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 43:546–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohan K, Rames B (2007) Traceability-based knowledge integration in group decision and negotiation activities. Decis Support Syst 43(3):968–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang A, Babar MA, Gorton I, Han J (2006) A survey of architecture design rationale. J Syst Softw 79(12):1792–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elgh F (2011) Modeling and management of product knowledge in an engineer-to-order business model. In: Culley SJ, Hicks BJ, McAloone TC, Howard TJ, Chen W (eds) Proceedings of the 18th international conference on engineering design (ICED11). Design Society, Glasgow, pp 86–95

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tang A, Jin Y, Han J (2007) A rationale-based architecture model for design traceability and reasoning. J Syst Softw 80(6):918–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bracewell R, Wallace K, Moss M, Knott D (2009) Capturing design rationale. Comput Aided Des 41(3):173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Claesson A (2006) A configurable component framework supporting platform-based product development. Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amadori K, Tarkia M, Ölvander J, Krus P (2012) Flexible and robust CAD models for design automation. Adv Eng Inform 26(2):180–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cederfeldt M, Sunnersjö S (2003) Solid modelling with dimensional and topological variability. In: Folkeson A, Gralen K, Norell M, Sellgren U (eds) Proceedings of the 14th international conference on engineering design (ICED11). Design Society, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boart P (2007) The enabling of product information in the conceptual phase. Dissertation, Luleå University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elgh F (2012) Decision support in the quotation process of engineered-to-order products. Adv Eng Inform 26(1):66–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Johansson J (2011) How to build flexible design automation systems for manufacturability analysis of the draw bending of aluminum profiles. J Manuf Sci Eng 133(6)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sunnersjö S (2012) Planning design automation systems for product families—a coherent, top down approach. In: Dorian M, Mario S, Neven P, Nenad B (eds) Proceedings of DESIGN 2012, the 12th international design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp 123–132

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cederfeldt M (2007) Planning design automation: a structured method and supporting tools. Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stokes M (2001) Managing engineering knowledge—MOKA: methodology for knowledge—based engineering applications. Professional Engineering Publishing Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lisandrin P, van Tooren M, (2002) Generic volume element meshing for optimization applications. In: 9th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Atlanta, 4–6 Sept 2002

    Google Scholar 

  21. La Rocca G, Krakers L, van Tooren M (202) Development of an ICAD generative model for blended wing-body aircraft design. In: 9th AIAA/ISSMO symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Atlanta, 4–6 Sept 2002

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Tooren M, La Rocca G, Krakers L, Beukers A (2003) Design and technology in aerospace. Parametric modeling of complex structure systems including active components. In: 13th international conference on composite materials, San Diego 14–18 July 2003

    Google Scholar 

  23. Curran R, Verhagen WJC, van Tooren M, van der Laan TH (2010) A multidisciplinary implementation methodology for knowledge-based engineering: KNOMAD. Expert Syst Appl 37(11):7336–7350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Friedenthal S, Moore A, Steiner R (2012) A practical guide to SysML. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schreiber GT, Akkermans H (2000) Knowledge engineering and management: the CommonKADS methodology. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Epistemics (2014) PCPACK. http://www.epistemics.co.uk/Notes/55-0-0.htm. Accessed 24 June 2014

  27. Haug A, Hvam L, Mortensen NH (2009) Implementation of conceptual product models into configurators: from months to minutes. In: Proceedings of MCPC—the world conference on mass customization and personalization, Helsinki, 4–8 Oct 2009

    Google Scholar 

  28. SemanticMediaWiki (2016) Semantic MediaWiki. https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Semantic_MediaWiki. Accessed 6 Dec 2016

  29. Haug A, Degn A, Poulsen B, Hvam L (2007) A prototype of a documentation system that supports the development and maintenance of product configuration systems. WSEAS Trans Inf Sci Appl 4(5):1048–1055

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stjepandić J, Verhagen WJC, Liese H, Bermell-Garcia P (2015) Knowledge-based engineering. In: Stjepandić J, Wognum N, Verhagen WJC (eds) Concurrent engineering in the 21st century: foundations, developments and challenges. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 255–286

    Google Scholar 

  31. Verhagen WJC, Bermell-Garcia P, van Dijk REC, Curran R (2012) A critical review of knowledge-based engineering: an identification of research challenges. Adv Eng Inform 26(1):5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Elgh F, Cederfeldt M (2007) Concurrent cost estimation as a tool for enhanced producibility—system development and applicability for producibility studies. J Prod Econ 109(1–2):12–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Johansson J (2007) A flexible design automation system for toolsets for the rotary draw bending of aluminium tubes. In: ASME 2007 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Las Vegas, 4–7 Sept 2007, pp 861–870

    Google Scholar 

  34. Elgh F, Johansson J (2014) Knowledge object—a concept for task modelling supporting design automation. In: Cha J, Chou SY, Stjepandić J, Curran R, Xu W (eds) Moving integrated product development to service clouds in the global economy. Advances in transdisciplinary engineering, vol 1. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 192–203

    Google Scholar 

  35. Johansson J (2015) Howtomation© suite: a novel tool for flexible design automation. In: Curran R, Wognum N, Borsato M, Stjepandić J, Verhagen WJC (eds) Transdisciplinary lifecycle analysis of systems. Advances in transdisciplinary engineering, vol 2. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 327–336

    Google Scholar 

  36. Elgh F, Poorkiany M (2012) Supporting traceability of design rationale in an automated engineer-to-order business model. In: Dorian M, Mario S, Neven P, Nenad B (eds) Proceedings of DESIGN 2012, the 12th international design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp 23–132

    Google Scholar 

  37. Elgh F (2014) Automated engineer-to-order systems: a task-oriented approach to enable traceability of design rationale. Int J Agile Syst Manag 7(3–4):324–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nan J, Li Q, (2012) Design automation system: supporting documentation and management. Master thesis, Jönköping University

    Google Scholar 

  39. Poorkiany M, Johansson J, Elgh F (2016) Capturing, structuring and accessing design rationale in integrated product design and manufacturing processes. Adv Eng Inform 30(3):522–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Poorkiany M, Johansson J, Elgh F (2014) Supporting tooling design of customized products by instant access to design rationale. In: Stahre J, Johansson B, Björkman M (eds) The 6th international swedish production symposium, Gothenburg, 16–18 Sept 2014

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden

    Fredrik Elgh & Joel Johansson

Authors
  1. Fredrik Elgh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joel Johansson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fredrik Elgh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. PROSTEP AG, Darmstadt, Germany

    Josip Stjepandić

  2. Aerospace Engineering, Air Transport and Operations, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands

    Nel Wognum

  3. Aerospace Engineering, Air Transport and Operations, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands

    Wim J. C. Verhagen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Elgh, F., Johansson, J. (2019). Traceability in Engineer-to-Order Businesses. In: Stjepandić, J., Wognum, N., J. C. Verhagen, W. (eds) Systems Engineering in Research and Industrial Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33312-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation