Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Positive Interventions in Substance Use Disorders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Positive Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychology

  • 1469 Accesses

Abstract

Positive psychology (PP) has grown as a field of study over the last two decades. The roots of the PP movement can be traced to Martin Seligman who in 1998 assumed the presidency of the American Psychological Association. At that time, he began to shift the focus in psychology research from pathology toward well-being. This change in focus was derived from the clear distinction between mental health and mental illness (Ryff and Keyes, J Personality Soc Psychol 69:719–727, 1995) exemplified by the World Health Organization (WHO) which defines health as “A state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” (World Health Organization, Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from World Health Organization: www.who.int/about/who-we-are/frequently-asked-questions, 2016). Most healthcare professionals have a greater knowledge and understanding of the treatment of illness, rather than of promoting well-being. As the field of PP has burgeoned, greater emphasis has shifted toward including, understanding, and strengthening those human qualities which promote human flourishing.

This recovery model archetype is the 12-Step model of recovery. This model is based on the subjective experience of those in recovery. Such subjective mental states cannot be directly observed or measured and can only be understood through the descriptions proffered by those who experience them. This was central to Carl Jung’s spiritually oriented psychology who had a foundational influence on Bill Wilson who went on to cofound Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). This spiritually oriented approach is related to the positive psychology movement in that its approach is focused on positive, meaningful experiences with less emphasis on dysfunctional behaviors (Galanter, J Subst Abus Treat 33:265–272, 2007). It is in this vein that the recovery movement has shared so much of its essence with positive psychology. Further explication of the concept of recovery will help to understand how these two movements can be cross-pollinated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. White W, Coon B. Methadone and the anti-medication bias in addiction treatment. Counselor. 2003;4(5):58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. White WL. Addiction recovery: its definition and conceptual boundaries. J Subst Abus Treat. 2007;33:229–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Krentzman AR. Review of the application of positive psychology to substance use, addiction, and recovery research. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27(1):151–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Krentzman AR, Barker SL. Counselors’ perspectives of positive psychology for the treatment of addiction: a mixed methods pilot study. Alcohol Treat Q. 2016;34(4):370–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Ries RK, Fiellin DA, Miller SC, Saitz R. The ASAM principles of addiction medicine. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. J Subst Abus Treat. 2007;33:221–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Witbrodt J, Kaskutas LA, Grella CE. How do recovery definitions distinguish recovering individuals? Five typologies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;148:109–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kownacki RJ, Shadish WR. Does alcoholics anonymous work? The results from a meta-analysis of controlled experiments. Subst Use Misuse. 1999;34(13):1897–916.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tonigan SJ, Toscova R, Miller WR. Meta-analysis of the literature on alcoholics anonymous: sample and study characteristics moderate findings. J Stud Alcohol. 1996;57(1):65–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferri M, Amato L, Davoli M. Alcoholics Anonymous and other 12-step programmes for alcohol dependence (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3): CD005032.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaskutas LA. Alcoholics anonymous effectiveness: faith meets science. J Addict Dis. 2009;28(2):145–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Connery HS, McHugh RK, Greenfield SF. Does AA work? That’s (in part) up to you. Curr Psychiatr Ther. 2005;4(5):56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Narcotics Anonymous World Services. 2019. www.NA.org. Retrieved from www.NA.org: www.na.org/admin/include/spaw2/uploads/pdf/pr/2306_NA_PRMAT_1021.pdf.

  15. National Institute on Drug Abuse. 2019. National Institute on Drug Abuse: Effective Treatments for Opioid Addiction. Retrieved from www.drugabuse.gov: https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/effective-treatments-opioid-addiction/effective-treatments-opioid-addiction.

  16. Longabaugh R, Wirtz PW, Mattson ME, Meyers JK. Project MATCH hypotheses: results and causal chain analyses. Providence: National Institute of Health; 2001. publication number 01-4238.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zemansky TR. The risen Phoenix: positive transformation within the context of long-term recovery in alcoholics anonymous. Ann Arbor: ProQuest Information and Learning Company; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  18. McCullough ME, Emmons RA, Tsang J-A. The grateful disposition: a conceptual and empirical topography. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(1):112–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Akhtar M, Boniwell I. Applying positive psychology to alcohol-misusing adolescents: a group intervention. Group. 2010;20(3):6–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Krentzman AR, Mannella KA, Hassett AL, Barnett NP, Cranford JA, Brower KJ, et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a web-based gratitude exercise among individuals in outpatient treatment for alcohol use disorder. J Posit Psychol. 2015;10(6):477–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Taylor SE, Kemeny ME, Reed GM, Bower JE, Gruenewald TL. Psychological resources, positive illusions, and health. Am Psychol. 2000;55:99–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurtines WM, Ball LR, Wood GH. Personality characteristics of long-term recovered alcoholics: a comparitive analysis. J ConsultClin Psychol. 1978;46(5):971–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kairouz S, Dube L. Abstinence and well-being among members of alcoholics anonymous: personal experience and social perceptions. J Soc Psychol. 2000;140(5):565–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Allen JP, Pollitt MJ, Nieuwsma JA, Blazer DG. Recovery on higher ground: spirituality in the treatment of substance abuse. Curr Psychiatr Ther. 2014;13:24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith TB, McCullough ME, Poll J. Religiousness and depression: evidence for a main effect and the moderating influence of stressful life events. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(4):614–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Elkins DN, Hedstrom LJ, Hughes LL, Leaf JA, Saunders C. Toward a humanistic phenomonological spirituality. J Humanist Psychol. 1988;28(4):5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cook CC. Addiction and spirituality. Addiction. 2004:539–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. George LK, Larsons DB, Koenig HG, McCullough ME. Spirituality and health: what we know, what we need to know. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2000;19(1):. Psychology module):102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Compton WC, Hoffman EL. Positive psychology: the science of happiness and flourishing. Belmont: Wadsworth; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nelson B, Kaminsky DB. When religion opens the door. Cancer Cytopathol. 2017;125(12):885–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lambert NM, Fincham FD, Braithwaite SR, Graham SM. Can prayer increase gratitude? Psychol Religion Spirituality. 2009;1(3):139–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaskutas L, Bond J, Weisner C. The role of religion, spirituality and alcoholics anonymous in sustained sobreity. Alcohol Treat Q. 2003;21(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kelly JF, Stout RL, Magill M, Tonigan JS, Pagano ME. Spirituality in recovery: a lagged mediational analysis of alcoholics anonymous’ principal theoretical mechanism of behavior change. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35(3):454–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zemore SE. A role for spiritual change in the benefits of 12-step involvement. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31(S3):76S–9S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Puchalski C, Romer AL. Taking a spiritual history allows clinicians to understand patients more fully. J Palliat Med. 2000;3(1):129–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Anandarajah G, Hight E. Spirituality and medical practice: using the HOPE questions as a practical tool for spiritual assessment. Am Fam Physician. 2001;63(1):81–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Saguil A, Phelps K. The spiritual assessment. Am Fam Physician. 2012;86(6):546–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Luadet AB, White WL. Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction and stress among former poly-substance users. Subst Use Misuse. 2008;43(1):27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. ASAM Board of Directors. Public policy statement: definition of addiction. Chevy Chase: American Society of Addiction Medicine; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dennis M, Scott C, Funk R, Foss M. The duration and correlates of addiction and treatment careers. J Subst Abus Treat. 2005;28:S51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Compton GE. 2001. Quality of life factors among recovering alcoholics. Wester Michican University, Kalamazoo: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UMI.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vilsaint CL, Kelly JF, Bergman BG, Groshkova T, Best D. Development and validation of a Brief Assessment of Recovery Capital (BARC-10) for alcohol and drug use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;177:71–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rettie HC, Hogan LM, Cox WM. The recovery strengths questionnaire for alcohol and drug use disorders. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2019;38:209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Groshkova T, Best D, White W. The assessment of recovery capital: properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2013;32:187–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Arndt S, Sahker E, Hedden S. Does the assessment of reocvery capital scale reflect a single or multiple domains. Subst Abuse Rehab. 2017;8:39–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cummins RA, Gullone E. Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement. Proceedings, Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, 74–93. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cooper Medical School of Rowan University/Cooper Health System, Camden, NJ, USA

    Christopher Milburn

Authors
  1. Christopher Milburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Milburn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Professor of Psychiatry, College of Medicine University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA

    Erick Messias

  2. Wiesbaden Academy of Psychotherapy, World Association for Positive and Transcultural Psychotherapy, Wiesbaden, Germany

    Hamid Peseschkian

  3. Department of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Consuelo Cagande

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Milburn, C. (2020). Positive Interventions in Substance Use Disorders. In: Messias, E., Peseschkian, H., Cagande, C. (eds) Positive Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33264-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33264-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33263-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33264-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation