Skip to main content

Sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): From Moral Imperatives to Indicators and Indexes. A Methodology for Validating and Assessing SDGs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspectives for a New Social Theory of Sustainability

Abstract

Sustainability is a multidimensional concept that is not directly measurable, so it requires a set of indicators in order to be assessed. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) program offers a detailed dashboard of sustainability indicators. However, the path from the value assumptions and policy (that underpin this program) to its statistical operationalization is not clear. In order to produce usable knowledge for policy, sustainability assessment needs to be redefined from a technical to a moral process that requires prior responses to normative questions. This chapter suggests a model for sustainable development based on a set of moral imperatives which further specify the popular three-pillar model of sustainability based on social, economic, and environmental dimensions. The aim of this study is thus threefold. Firstly, it aims to clarify the conceptual framework that is the foundation of country-level sustainability. Secondly, it proposes a methodology for assessing the different moral dimensions of sustainability. Finally, it aims to validate this framework and also to assess the state of art of each of the European Union (EU) Member States with regard to the SDGs. Operationally, using the latest available national cross-country data with multivariate statistical analysis, the study builds several composite indexes to assess the performance of European Member States on single imperatives, in order to identify priorities and gaps that must be addressed to achieve sustainability.

This chapter is the result of active collaboration among the authors. In the final draft, Angela Delli Paoli wrote Sects. 5.2, 5.4, and 5.7; Felice Addeo wrote Sects. 5.3, 5.5, and 5.6, and Emiliana Mangone wrote Sect. 5.1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addeo, F., & Bottoni, G. (2016). Coesione Sociale e regimi di welfare. Un’indagine empirica sugli Stati dell’Unione Europea. In M. Del Forno (Ed.), Nel complesso mondo del welfare. Idee, metodi e pratiche (pp. 137–167). Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballet, J., Koffi, J. M., & Pelenc, J. (2013). Environment, justice and the capability approach. Ecological Economics, 85, 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burford, G., Hoover, E., Velasco, I., Janouˇsková, S., Jimenez, A., Piggot, G., et al. (2013). Bringing the “missing pillar” into sustainable development goals: Towards intersubjective values-based indicators. Sustainability, 5(7), 3035–3059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campagnolo, L., Carraro, C., Eboli, F. and Farnia, L. (2015). Assessing SDGs: a new methodology to measure sustainability. Paper presented at the UN Summit on Sustainable Development Goals, New York, September 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi trait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 58, 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues in field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Daly, L., Fioramonti, L., Giovannini, E., Kubiszewski, I., Mortensen, L. F., et al. (2016). Modelling and measuring sustainable well-being in connection with the UN sustainable development goals. Ecological Economics, 130, 350–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, A. L. (2012). Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 17, 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delli Paoli, A., & Addeo, F. (2019). Assessing SDGs: A methodology to measure sustainability. Athens Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Franco, G., & Marradi, A. (2013). Factor analysis and principal component analysis. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Sarachaga, J. M., Jato-Espino, D., & Castro-Fresno, D. (2018). Is the sustainable development goals (SDGs) index an adequate framework to measure the progress of the 2030 agenda? Sustainable Development, 26, 663–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. (2003). Citizenship and the environment. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frediani, A. A. (2010). Sen’s capability approach as a framework to the practice of development. Development in Practice, 20(2), 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, C. (1997). Irreducible social goods and the informational basis of Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Journal of International Development, 9(2), 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I., Meadowcroft, J., Dryzek, J., Gerhards, J., Lengfeld, H., Marandya, A., et al. (2008). JESP symposium: Climate change and social policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(4), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hák, T., Janousková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hák, T., Kovanda, J., & Weinzettel, J. (2012). A method to assess the relevance of sustainability indicators: Application to the indicator set of the Czech Republic’s sustainable development strategy. Ecological Indicators, 17, 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hák, T., Moldan, B., & Dahl, A. (Eds.). (2007). Sustainability indicators: A scientific assessment. SCOPE 67. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2016). World Happiness Report 2016, Update (Vol. 1). New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/happiness-report/2016/HR-V1_web.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Helne, T., & Hirvilammi, T. (2015). Wellbeing and sustainability: A relational approach. Sustainable Development, 23, 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2016). The imperatives of sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 25(3), 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., & Martens, P. (2007). Sustainable development: How to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 3(2), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., Parto, S., & Gibson, R. B. (2005). Governance for sustainable development: Moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1/2), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23, 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littig, B., & Grießler Griessler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, E. (2006). Environmental policy and political justice: A Rawlsian perspective. The Triple Helix, 3(1), 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maffettone, S. (2010). Rawls. An introduction. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangone, E. (2007). Territorial development and governance: Third sector organizations. In Girardot, J. J. & Miedes, B. (Ed.) International Conference of Territorial Intelligence: Huelva, 2007. Papers on Territorial Intelligence and Governance Partecipative Action-Research and Territorial Development (pp. 537–555). Huelva, Spain: Observatorio Local de Empleo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, S. (2013). Indices and indicators in development: An unhealthy obsession with numbers. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. (2012). The social pillar of sustainable development: A literature review and framework for policy analysis. Sustainability. Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2003). Capabilities as a fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Cambridge, MA, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Revised ed.). Cambridge: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, J. (2001). The indicator explosion: Local needs and international challenges. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 87, 119–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Durand-Delacre, D., & Teksoz, K. (2016). SDGs Index and Dashboards Global Report. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2, 3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1982). Choice, welfare and measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2003). Development as capability expansion. In S. Fukuda-Parr & A. K. Shiva Kum (Eds.), Readings in human development. Concepts, measures, and policies for a development approach (pp. 3–16). New Delhi, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 6(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C., & Kanie, N. (2016). The transformative potential of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). International Environmental Agreements, 16, 393–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress, Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2015). Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY: UN General Assembly. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf.

  • UNSD. (2015). Discussion paper on principles of using quantification to operationalize the SDGs and criteria for Indicator selection. ESA/STAT/441/2/58A/14. New York, NY: UNStatistical Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendling, Z. A., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., Levy, M. A., de Sherbinin, A., et al. (2018). 2018 environmental performance index. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wichaisri, S., & Sopadang, A. (2017). Trends and future directions in sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 26, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Delli Paoli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Delli Paoli, A., Addeo, F., Mangone, E. (2020). Sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): From Moral Imperatives to Indicators and Indexes. A Methodology for Validating and Assessing SDGs. In: Nocenzi, M., Sannella, A. (eds) Perspectives for a New Social Theory of Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33173-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics