Skip to main content

The Ethical Awakening of Human Anatomy: Reassessing the Past and Envisioning a More Ethical Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Approaches to Human Remains

Abstract

Human anatomy lives at the interface between its dependence upon high quality dead human bodies for use in teaching and research, and the need to show respect for the deceased and their families. This tension has existed throughout the 500 years of modern anatomy’s development, although for many of those years the pressures to provide sufficient numbers of dead bodies obscured serious ethical deliberation. As awareness of the latter has burgeoned over recent years, attention has turned to practices such as the use of anonymous archival human material, reliance upon using unclaimed bodies as opposed to bodies specifically bequeathed for dissecting purposes, and the legitimacy of public exhibitions of dissected plastinated whole bodies. Discussion of these topics has necessitated an assessment of well-known historical incidents, including dissection as a punishment for murder, the resurrectionists (grave robbers), the dependence of iconic figures in anatomy such as Vesalius on these questionable procedures, and the practice of Nazi anatomists in working closely with the authorities to obtain unclaimed bodies from ethically abhorrent sources. A dominant message to emerge from these historical episodes has been anatomists’ ready acceptance of the bodies of the poor and vulnerable. As anatomists have begun to address ethical imperatives, a theme to come into increasing prominence has been the need to humanise the practice of anatomy, in an attempt to recognise the dignity of the recently deceased and their interests when alive. This provides an ethical base from which to address new challenges for human anatomists, including 3D printing of human material, the growing use of data sets freely available on the internet, and the increasing availability of donated bodies following physician assisted death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anatomy Act. 1832. The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angetter, D.C. 2000. Anatomical Science at University of Vienna 1938–45. Lancet 355: 1445–1457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, H. 1989. The Body Snatchers. New York: Dorset Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, D.S., F. Marzouk, K. Chulak-Oglu, et al. 2016. Anatomy Education for the YouTube Generation. Anatomical Sciences Education 9: 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazelon, E. R. 2013. The Nazi Anatomists. Slate. 6 November 2013 http://www.slate.com/articles/life/history/2013/11/nazi_anatomy_history_the_origins_of_conservatives_anti_abortion_claims_that.html. Accessed 25 June 2019.

  • Boyde, A., P. Fraher, and J.F. Morris, et al. 2002. Letter: Dissections in Display. The Independent, 16 March 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Medical Association. 2006. Human Tissue Legislation: Guidance from the BMA’s Medical Ethics Department. London: British Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. 2001. Learning from Bristol: The Report of the Public Inquiry Into Children’s Heart Surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1884–1995. Bristol: Crown Copyright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, D. 2007. Digging Up the Dead: The Life and Times of Astley Cooper, An Extraordinary Surgeon. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, D.B. 2008. Congress Considering Plastination Import Ban. American Association for Anatomy News 17: 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A.V. 2009. The Body in Bioethics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, S.R. 1988. The Report of the Cervical Cancer Inquiry: The Report of the Committee of Inquiry Into Allegations Concerning the Treatment of Cervical Cancer at National Women’s Hospital and Into Other Related Matters. Auckland: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champney, T.H. 2011. A Proposal for a Policy on the Ethical Care and Use of Cadavers and Their Tissues. Anatomical Sciences Education 4: 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champney, T., S. Hildebrandt, D.G. Jones, et al. 2019. BODIES R US: Ethical Views on the Commercialization of the Dead in Medical Education and Research. Anatomical Sciences Education 12: 317–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, E.H. 1978. John Hunter as An Expert Witness. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 60: 412–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dally, A.F., R.E. Driscoll, and H.E. Settles. 1993. The Uniform Anatomical Gift Act: What Every Clinical Anatomist Should Know. Clinical Anatomy 6: 247–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. 2001. Report of a Census of Organs and Tissues Retained by Pathology Services in England. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. 2014. Andreas Vesalius: Father of Modern Anatomy. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 75 (12): 711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federative International Committee for Ethics and Medical Humanities of the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists. 2012. Recommendations of Good Practice for the Donation and Study of Human Bodies and Tissues for Anatomical Examination. http://www.ifaa.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/IFAA-guidelines-220811.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2019.

  • Federative International Committee for Ethics and Medical Humanities (FIECM) of the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA). 2018. Ethical and Medical Humanities Perspectives on the Public Display of Plastinated Human Bodies. www.ifaa.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/FICEM-on-plastination-exhibits_2018.pdf. Accessed 4 July 2019.

  • Garment, A., S. Lederer, N. Rogers, et al. 2007. Let the Dead Teach the Living: The Rise of Body Bequeathal in 20th-Century America. Academic Medicine 82: 1000–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelhaus, P. 2016. Bioprinting. In Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, ed. H. ten Have. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getty Images. 2019. Body Worlds. https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/photos/body-worlds?sort=mostpopular&mediatype=photography&phrase=body%20worlds. Accessed 4 July 2019.

  • Gray, H. 1858. Anatomy: Descriptive and Surgical. London: JW Parker and Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grow, B., and J. Shiffman. 2017a. In the US Market for Human Bodies, Almost Anyone Can Dissect and Sell the Dead: Part 1. Reuters Investigates. October 24. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-bodies-brokers/. Accessed 4 July 2019.

  • Grow, B., and J. Shiffman. 2017b. A Reuters Journalist Bought Human Body Parts, Then Learned a Donor’s Heart-Wrenching Story: Part 2. Reuters Investigates. October 25. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-bodies-cody/. Accessed 4 July 2019.

  • Habbal, O. 2009. The State of Human Anatomy Teaching in the Medical Schools of Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: Present and Future Perspectives. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal 9: 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habicht, J.L., C. Kiessling, and A. Winkelmann. 2018. Bodies for Anatomy Education in Medical Schools: An Overview of the Sources of Cadavers Worldwide. Academic Medicine 93: 1293–1300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankinson, R.J. (ed.). 2008. The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B. 2008. The Anatomist. Melbourne: Scribe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage New Zealand. 2014. Koiwi Tangata: Human Remains. Wellington: Heritage New Zealand, Pouhere Taonga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, S. 2016. The Anatomy of Murder: Ethical Transgressions and Anatomical Science During the Third Reich. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Tissue Act. 2008. Parliamentary Counsel Office, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, R.H. 1931. A Short History of Anatomy. London: John Bale and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Plastination. 2019a. Mission of the Exhibition. https://bodyworlds.com/plastination/organizations/. Accessed 4 July 2019.

  • Institute for Plastination. 2019b. Body Donation. https://bodyworlds.com/plastination/bodydonation/. Accessed 4 July 2019.

  • Joffe, S.N. 2014. Andreas Vesalius: The Making, the Madman, and the Myth. London: Authorhouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G. 1989. The New Zealand “Report of the Cervical Cancer Inquiry”: Significance for Medical Education. Medical Journal of Australia 151: 450–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G. 1994. Use of Bequeathed and Unclaimed Bodies in the Dissecting Room. Clinical Anatomy 7: 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.L. 2007. Humanity’s Mirror: 150 Years of Anatomy in Melbourne. Victoria: Haddington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G. 2011. The Anatomy Museum and Mental Illness: The Centrality of Informed Consent. In Exhibiting Madness in Museums: Remembering Psychiatry Through Collection and Display, ed. C. Coleborne and D. MacKinnon, 161–177. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G. 2016a. The Artificial World of Plastination: A Challenge to Religious Perspectives on the Dead Human Body. New Bioeth 22 (3): 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G. 2016b. YouTube Anatomy Education: Sources of Ethical Perplexity. Anatomical Sciences Education 9 (5): 500–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G. 2016c. The Public Display of Plastinates as a Challenge to the Integrity of Anatomy. Clinical Anatomy 29: 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G. 2017. Human Anatomy: A Review of the Science, Ethics and Culture of a Discipline in Transition. In Human Anatomy, ed. A.K. Sisu, 3–20. Rijeka: InTech Open Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G. 2019a. The Dead Human Body: Reflections of An Anatomist. In Healthcare Ethics, Law and Professionalism: Essays on the Works of Alastair V Campbell, ed. V.T. Chuan, R. Huxtable, and N. Peart, 225–241. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G. 2019b. Three-dimensional Printing in Anatomy Education: Assessing Potential Ethical Dimensions. Anatomical Sciences Education 12: 435–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G. forthcoming. Exploring the Policy Dimensions of Body Donation Following Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID). Anatomical Sciences Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G., and S. Fennell. 1991. Bequests, Cadavers and Dissections; Sketches from New Zealand History. New Zealand Medical Journal 104: 210–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G., and R.J. Harris. 1998. Archaeological Human Remains: Scientific, Cultural and Ethical Considerations. Current Anthropology 39: 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G., and M.I. Whitaker. 2009a. Speaking for the Dead, 2nd ed. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G., and M.I. Whitaker. 2009b. Engaging with Plastination and the BodyWorlds Phenomenon: A Cultural and Intellectual Challenge for Anatomists. Clinical Anatomy 22: 770–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G., and M.I. Whitaker. 2012. Anatomy’s Use of Unclaimed Bodies: Reasons Against Continued Dependence on an Ethically Dubious Practice. Clinical Anatomy 25: 246–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G., R. Gear, and K.A. Galvin. 2003. Stored Human Tissue: An Ethical Perspective on the Fate of Anonymous Archival Material. Journal of Medical Ethics 29: 343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, P.A., T.H. Champney, and S. Hildebrandt. 2017. The Incompatibility of the Use of Unclaimed Bodies with Ethical Anatomical Education in the United States. Anatomical Sciences Education 10: 200–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M.R., M.I. Whitaker, and D.G. Jones. 2014. I See Dead People: Insights from the Humanities into the Nature of Plastinated Cadavers. Journal of Medical Humanities 35: 361–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnel, W. 2004. Statement by the Anatomische Gesellschaft on the Infamous Body-World Show of Dr Gunther von Hagens. Plexus: Newsletter of the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists, December 2004. http://an-server.pote.hu/DEPT/Plexus0412.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2019.

  • Lachman, E. 1977. Anatomist of Infamy: August Hirt. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 51: 594–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancet. 1832. Editorial. Lancet 19 (481): 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., L. Nie, Z. Li, et al. 2012. Maximizing Modern Distribution of Complex Anatomical Spatial Information: 3D Reconstruction and Rapid Prototype Production of Anatomical Corrosion Casts of Human Specimens. Anatomical Sciences Education 5: 330–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, K.H., Z.Y. Loo, S.J. Goldie, et al. 2016. Use of 3D Printed Models in Medical Education: A Randomized Control Trial Comparing 3D Prints Versus Cadaveric Materials for Learning External Cardiac Anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education 9: 213–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S.C., J. Hsu, and V.Y. Fan. 2009. “Silent Virtuous Teachers”: Anatomical Dissection in Taiwan. BMJ 339: b5001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. 1973. Greek Science After Aristotle. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, H. 2005. Human Remains. Melbourne: University Press Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, H. 2010. Possessing the Dead. Melbourne: University Press Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, F. 2018. ‘Real Bodies’ Exhibition Causes Controversy in Australia. BBC. April 26. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-43902524. Accessed 14 July 2019.

  • Mavrodi, A., and G. Paraskevas. 2014. Mondino de Luzzi: A Luminous Figure in the Darkness of the Middle Ages. Croatian Medical Journal 55 (1): 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, W.F. 1985. Religious Justification for Donating Body Parts. Hastings Center Report 15: 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMenamin, P.A., M.R. Quayle, C.R. McHenry, et al. 2014. The Production of Anatomical Teaching Resources Using Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing Technology. Anatomical Sciences Education 7: 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W. 2005. The Knife Man: The Extraordinary Life and Times of John Hunter, Father of Modern Surgery. London: Bantam Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morriss-Kay, G. 2002. Bodyworlds: Exhibition at the Atlantis Gallery, The Old Truman Brewery, Brick Lane, London, 23 March to 29 September 2002. Journal of Anatomy 200 (5): 535–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Hill, B. 1994. Human Genetics in Nazi Germany. In Medicine, Ethics, and the Third Reich: Historical and Contemporary Issues, ed. J.J. Michalczyk, 27–34. Kansas City: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahshoni, K. 2009. Haredim Launch Battle Against Human Body Exhibit. Ynetnews. March 22. https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3690258,00.html. Accessed 14 July 2019.

  • O’Reilly, M.K., S. Reese, T. Herlihy, et al. 2016. Fabrication and Assessment of 3D Printed Anatomical Models of the Lower Limb for Anatomical Teaching and Femoral Vessel Access Training in Medicine. Anatomical Sciences Education 9: 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, K. 1995. The Life of the Corpse: Division and Dissection in Late Medieval Europe. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 50: 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retained Organs Commission. 2002. A Consultation Document on Unclaimed and Unidentifiable Organs and Tissue, a Possible Regulatory Framework. London: National Health Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. 2001. Death, Dissection and the Destitute, 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. 2008a. Historical Introduction. In Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, 40th ed, ed. S. Standring, xvii–xxi. London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R. 2008b. The Making of Mr. Gray’s Anatomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, R., and B. Hurwitz. 1987. Jeremy Bentham’s Self Image: An Exemplary Bequest for Dissection. British Medical Journal 295 (6591): 195–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riederer, B.M. 2016. Body Donations Today and Tomorrow: What is Best Practice and Why? Clinical Anatomy 29: 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riederer, B.M., and J. Bueno-López. 2014. Anatomy, Respect for the Body and Body Donation—A Guide for Good Practices. European Journal of Anatomy 18: 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, J. N., and D. Perlov. 2009. Body Worlds: An anatomical exhibition of real human bodies. Summary of Ethical Review. https://www.mos.org/sites/dev-elvis.mos.org/files/docs/press-kits/Summary%20of%202004-05%20Ethical%20Review%20%20CA%20SCI%20Center.pdf. Accessed 11 July 2019.

  • Sander, I.M., M.T. McGoldrick, M.N. Helms, et al. 2017. Three-Dimensional Printing of X-Ray Computed Tomography Datasets with Multiple Materials Using Open-Source Data Processing. Anatomical Sciences Education 10: 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawday, J. 1995. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Rennaissance Culture. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Sasse, L. 2006. Advise and Consent: On the Americanization of Body Worlds. BioSocieties 1: 369–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidelman, W.E. 1989. In Memoriam: Medicine’s Confrontation with Evil. Hastings Center Report 19: 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.L., and J.F.X. Jones. 2018. Dual-Extrusion 3D Printing of Anatomical Models for Education. Anatomical Sciences Education 11: 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.F., N. Tollemache, D. Covill, et al. 2018. Take Away Body Parts! An Investigation Into the Use of 3D-Printed Anatomical Models in Undergraduate Anatomy Education. Anatomical Sciences Education 11: 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, M. 2006. Dystopian Anxieties Versus Utopian Ideals: Medicine from Frankenstein to the Visible Human Project and Body Worlds. Science and Culture 15 (1): 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štrkalj, G. 2016. Humanistic Anatomy: A New Program for an Old Discipline. New York: Nova Biomedical.

    Google Scholar 

  • Štrkalj, G., and N. Pather (eds.). 2017. Commemorations and Memorials: Exploring the Human Face of Anatomy. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subasinghe, S.K., and D.G. Jones. 2015. Human Body Donation Programs in Sri Lanka: Buddhist Perspectives. Anatomical Sciences Education 8: 484–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uniform Law Commission, The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. 2006. Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA). Chicago: Uniform Law Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, N., G. Haddow, T. Seymour, et al. 2017. 3D Bioprint Me: A Socioethical View of Bioprinting Human Organs and Tissues. Journal of Medical Ethics 43: 618–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vesalius, A. 1543. De Humani Corporis Fabrica. Newly Digitized 1543 Edition. www.vesaliusfabrica.com/en/original-fabrica/the-art-of-the-fabrica/newly-digitized-1543-edition.html. Accessed 5 July 2019.

  • von Hagens, G. 1979. Impregnation of Soft Biological Specimens with Thermosetting Resins and Elastomeres. Anatomical Record 194: 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hagens, G., and A. Whalley (eds.). 2000. Anatomy Art: Fascination Beneath the Surface. Catalogue on the Exhibition. Heidelberg: Institute for Plastination.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hagens, G., K. Tiedemann, and W. Krit. 1987. The Current Potential of Plastination. Anatomy and Embryology 175: 411–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainman, B., and J. Cornwall. 2019. Body Donation After Medically Assisted Death: An Emerging Consideration for Donor Programs. Anatomical Sciences Education 12: 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. 2001. Inquiry Into the Matters Arising from the Post-mortem and Anatomical Examination Practices of the Institute of Forensic Medicine. Sydney: The Government of the State of New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikler, D., and J. Barondes. 1993. Bioethics and Anti-Bioethics in Light of Nazi Medicine: What Must We Remember? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3: 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, A. 2016. Consent and Consensus—Ethical Perspectives on Obtaining Bodies for Anatomical Dissection. Clinical Anatomy 29: 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, A., and F.H. Guldner. 2004. Cadavers as Teachers: The Dissecting Room Experience in Thailand. BMJ 329 (7480): 1455–1457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkelmann, A., A.K. Heinze, and S. Hendrix. 2016. Acknowledging Tissue Donation: Human Cadaveric Specimens in Musculoskeletal Research. Clinical Anatomy 29: 65–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaqinuddin, A., M.F. Ikram, M. Zafar, et al. 2016. The Integrated Clinical Anatomy Program at Alfaisal University: An Innovative Model of Teaching Clinically Applied Functional Anatomy in a Hybrid Curriculum. Advances in Physiology Education 40: 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J.C., M.R. Quayle, J.W. Adams, et al. 2019. Three-dimensional Printing of Archived Human Fetal Material for Teaching Purposes. Anatomical Sciences Education 12: 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Gareth Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jones, D.G. (2019). The Ethical Awakening of Human Anatomy: Reassessing the Past and Envisioning a More Ethical Future. In: Squires, K., Errickson, D., Márquez-Grant, N. (eds) Ethical Approaches to Human Remains. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32926-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics