Skip to main content

Ethical Issues of Bioarchaeology in New Zealand-Aotearoa: Relationships, Research, and Repatriation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Approaches to Human Remains

Abstract

New Zealand has a high profile internationally for the repatriation of human skeletal remains, with repatriation starting in the 1970s, and international and national repatriations continuing to the present day. The ethical issues surrounding the use of Māori human skeletal remains (kōiwi tangata Māori) for research are significant as kōiwi tangata are considered tūpuna (ancestors). Kōiwi tangata Māori embody central elements of Māori identity including genealogy and wellbeing, thus the study of their remains is abhorrent for many Māori. This chapter provides a review from both a Māori and bioarchaeological perspective on repatriation issues of kōiwi tangata Māori. We present a discussion of the Māori worldview and their relationship with the dead, interactions and relationships between Māori and bioarchaeologists during the stages of the repatriation process, and the attitudes of repatriation by bioarchaeologists working in New Zealand. Ethnographic work is presented on the attitudes of bioarchaeologists and archaeologists in New Zealand and these are contrasted to the situation in England of working with local human skeletal remains. Internationally, New Zealand is unique, where bioarchaeology and archaeological practice is very much intertwined with Māori cultural and spiritual values, making the relationships between iwi (a Māori tribe or group of people descended from a common ancestor and associated with a distinct territory) and bioarchaeologists generally positive.

Helen Gilmore and Amber Aranui: Shared first authorship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, H., and C. Phillips. 2010. Maintaining the Dialogue: Archaeology, Cultural Heritage and Indigenous Communities. In Bridging the Divide: Indigenous Communities and Archaeology into the 21st Century, ed. C. Phillips and H. Allen, 17–48. Oakland: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranui, A.K. 2018. Te Hokinga Mai O Ngā Tūpuna: Māori Perspectives of Repatriation and the Scientific Research of Ancestral Remains. Dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. 2010. Wairau Bar Kōiwi Tīpuna and Taonga. Te Rangitāne o Wairau, Unpublished Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auckland War Memorial Museum. 2008. Governance Policy: Human Remains. Auckland: Auckland War Memorial Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, C. 1991. Tikanga Whakaaro: Key Concepts in Māori Culture. Auckland: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, R., A. Frame, and P. Meredith. 2013. Te Mātāpunenga: A Compendium of References to the Concepts and Institutions of Māori Customary Law. Wellington: Victoria University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienkowski, P. 2014. Authority and the Power of Place: Exploring the Legitimacy of Authorized and Alternate Voices in the Restitution Discourse. In Museums and Restitution: New Practices, New Approaches, ed. L. Tythacott and K. Arvanitis, 31–52. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology [BABAO]. 2010. Reburial and Repatriation. http://www.babao.org.uk/publications/reburial-and-repatriation Accessed 5 August 2018.

  • British Museum. 2013. British Museum Policy: Human Remains in the Collection. London: The British Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Museum Act. 1963. The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, H.R., and P. Petchey. 2018. Human Skeletal Remains and Bioarchaeology in New Zealand. In Archaeological Human Remains: Legacies of Imperialism, Communism and Colonialism, ed. B. O’Donnabhin and M.C. Lozada, 93–110. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, H.R., N. Tayles, S.E. Halcrow, et al. 2010. The People of Wairau Bar: A Re-examination. Journal of Pacific Archaeology 1 (1): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. 1993. Archaeology and Indigenous Rights: The World Archaeological Congress’ Code of Ethics from an Archaeologist’s Point of View. Archaeology in New Zealand 34: 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M., and B. Hudson. 2011. The NRD Site Community Report. Auckland: CFG Heritage Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canterbury Museum. 1998. Kōiwi Tangata/Human Remains Policy. Pouhere Taonga: Heritage New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, S. 2012. Dissection and Display in Eighteenth-Century London. In Anatomical Dissection in Enlightenment England and Beyond. Autopsy Pathology and Display, ed. P. Mitchell, 95–114. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.L., C.L. King, H.R. Buckley, et al. 2017. Biological Anthropology in the Indo-Pacific Region: New Approaches to Age-Old Questions. Journal of Indo-Pacific Archaeology 41: 78–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, E.M. 2011. Julius Haast, the Canterbury Museum and Māori. Dissertation, Massey University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corradini, E., and M. Bukowski. 2012. Proposed European Anatomical Collections Network. http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/umacj/2012/corradini-119/XML/CorradiniBukowski_xdiml.xml Accessed 12 December 2014.

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport [DCMS]. 2005. Guidance for the Care of Human Remains in Museums. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesen, M. (ed.). 2013. Curating Human Remains: Caring for the Dead in the United Kingdom. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, K., and G. O’Regan. 1994. Murihiku Resolution of Kōiwi Tangata Management. New Zealand Museums Journal 24: 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, H., C. Schafer, and S. Halcrow. 2013. Tapu and the Invention of the “Death Taboo”: An Analysis of the Transformation of a Polynesian Cultural Concept. Journal of Social Archaeology 13: 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F. 2015. Understanding Human Remains Repatriation: Practice Procedures at the British Museum and the Natural History Museum. Museum Management and Curatorship 30: 138–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (Formerly New Zealand Historic Places Trust Pouhere Taonga). 2010. Kōiwi Tangata/Human Remains. Archaeological Guidelines Series 8. Pouhere Taonga: Heritage New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act. 2014. New Zealand Government, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Historic Places Act. 1993. New Zealand Government, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hole, B. 2007. Playthings for the Foe: The Repatriation of Human Remains in New Zealand. Public Archaeology 6(1):5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Tissue Act. 2004. The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Tissue (Scotland) Act. 2006. The Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, T. 2011. Contesting Human Remains in Museum Collections: The Crisis of Cultural Authority. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.G., and R.J. Harris. 1998. Archeological Human Remains. Current Anthropology 39: 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanga Aotearoa Repatriation Programme. 2005. Background to the Karanga Aotearoa Repatriation Programme. Wellington: Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. 2003. The Penguin History of New Zealand. Auckland: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klesert, A., and S. Powell. 1993. A Perspective on Ethics and the Reburial Controversy. American Antiquity 58: 348–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, C.S. 2015. Bioarchaeology: Interpreting Behavior from the Human Skeleton, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKie, R. 2003. Scientists Fight to Save Ancestral Bone Bank: Aborigines Demand Return of Skeletal Remains. The Observer. 28 September. https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/sep/28/australia.highereducation. Accessed 20 June 2018.

  • Mays, S., and M. Smith. 2009. Ethical Dimensions of Reburial, Retention and Repatriation of Archaeological Human Remains: A British Perspective. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology, ed. Lewis, M.E., and M. Clegg, 107–117. Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, C. 2013. The Practice of Repatriation: A Case Study from New Zealand. In Museums and Restitution: New Practices, New Approaches, ed. L. Tythacott and K. Arvanitis, 71–84. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, C. 2014. Museums—Museums Expand and Diversify, 1945 to 1990. http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/museums/page-4. Accessed 20 June 2018.

  • Mead, S.M. 2003. Tikanga Māori: Living by Māori Values. Wellington: Huia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meighan, C. 1992. Some Scholars’ Views on Reburial. American Antiquity 57: 704–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S., and V. Tranter. 2010. Research into Issues Surrounding Human Bones in Museums. London: Business Development Research Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. 2010. Kōiwi Tangata Policy. Wellington: Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutch, N. 2013. Voyage of Rediscovery. University of Otago Magazine 34: 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, C. 2011. Andreas Reischek Collection of Kōiwi Tangata in Vienna. Karanga Aotearoa Repatriation Programme, Unpublished Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Treaty Settlements. 2015. Deed of Settlement of Historic Claims: Ngatikahu Ki Whangaroa and Ngatikahu Trust and the Crown, Unpublished Document.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, N. 2003. Report of the Working Group on Human Remains, Unpublished Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker Pearson, M., T. Schadla-Hall, and G. Moshenska. 2011. Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 21: 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peers, L. 2004. Repatriation: A Gain for Science? Anthropology Today 20: 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitts, M. 2011. Digging Deeper: Comment on Resolving the Human Remains Crisis in British Archaeology. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 21: 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomare, M. 1993. Memorandum: Tattooed Heads. Wellington: Karanga Aotearoa Repatriation Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restall Orr, E. 2006. Human Remains: The Acknowledgment of Sanctity. Paper Presented at the Respect for Ancient British Human Remains: Philosophy and Practice Conference, Manchester Museum, Manchester, UK, 17 November 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C.A. 2009. Human Remains in Archaeology: A Handbook. York: Council for British Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckstuhl, K., N. Tayles, H.R. Buckley, et al. 2015. The Ancestors Speak: Kōiwi Tangata, Mātauranga Māori and the Development of Biological Anthropology in New Zealand. In The Routledge Handbook of Bioarchaeology in Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands, ed. M. Oxenham and H.R. Buckley, 637–655. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, D. 2010. Ethics and Burial Archaeology. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirres, M.P. 1982. Tapu. The Journal of the Polynesian Society 91: 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayles, N. 2009. Repatriation—A View from the Receiving End: New Zealand. In The Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology, ed. M. Lewis and M. Clegg, 131–135. Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayles, N., and S. Halcrow. 2011. New Zealand/Aotearoa. In The Routledge Handbook of Archaeological Human Remains and Legislation, ed. N. Márquez-Grant and L. Fibiger, 647–648. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaty of Waitangi. 1840. https://nzhistory.govt.nz/politics/treaty/read-the-treaty/maori-text. Accessed 9 September 2018.

  • Treaty of Waitangi Act. 1975. New Zealand Government, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaty of Waitangi Amendment Act. 1985. New Zealand Government, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, R.J., and J. Blain. 2011. From Respect to Reburial: Negotiating Pagan Interest in Prehistoric Human Remains in Britain, Through the Avebury Consultation. Public Archaeology 10: 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, T. 1991. Modern Death: Taboo or Not Taboo? Sociology 25: 293–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, E. 2008. Reburying the Past: The Effects of Repatriation and Reburial on Scientific Inquiry. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whanganui Regional Museum. 2006. Whanganui Regional Museum Policy: Human Remains/Kōiwi Tangata. Whanganui: Whanganui Regional Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H.W. 2006. A Dictionary of the Māori Language. Wellington: Legislation Direct.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. 2000. Death. So What? Sociology, Sequestration and Emancipation. The Sociological Review 48: 649–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Archaeological Congress [WAC]. 1989. The Vermillion Accord, Archaeological Ethics and the Treatment of the Dead: A Statement of Principles Agreed by Archaeologists and Indigenous Peoples at the World Archaeological Congress, Vermillion, USA. http://worldarch.org/code-of-ethics/. Accessed 5 August 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Helen Gilmore’s research was funded by a University of Otago Ph.D. scholarship and ethical approval was gained from the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (13/190). All participant names have been changed for anonymity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siân E. Halcrow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gilmore, H., Aranui, A., Halcrow, S.E. (2019). Ethical Issues of Bioarchaeology in New Zealand-Aotearoa: Relationships, Research, and Repatriation. In: Squires, K., Errickson, D., Márquez-Grant, N. (eds) Ethical Approaches to Human Remains. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32926-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics