Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Human Remains in Museum Collections in the United Kingdom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Approaches to Human Remains

Abstract

Human remains collections can be found in museums, university departments, and even private collections across the UK. These collections pose many ethical challenges in their management and care, many unique to human remains, which can differ according to the type of holding institution, nature of the collection, and the way in which it is used or studied. These collections are often associated with legacies of poor ethical standards, particularly in terms of early collecting practices. This chapter will explore these factors and the challenges they pose. In the modern context of fluid socio-political and cultural change, museums and other holding institutions are faced with ever-changing external influences and must be able to respond in a dynamic and transparent way. This chapter will also discuss the ethical care and curation of human remains collections in UK museums and other repositories, with a focus on collections acquired and/or curated in England where reference to legislation concerning the care and management of collections is required. Finally, it will explore the concept of harm to communities, public and to science, that can be caused by a lack of transparency and poor decision and policy making with regard to human remains collections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Advisory Panel on the Archaeology of Burials in England [APABE]. 2010. Advisory Panel on the Archaeology of Burials in England (APABE). http://www.archaeologyuk.org/apabe/. Accessed 27 August 2018.

  • Advisory Panel on the Archaeology of Burials in England [APABE]. 2017. Guidance for Best Practice for the Treatment of Human Remains Excavated from Christian Burial Grounds in England, 2nd ed. London: Advisory Panel on the Archaeology of Burials in England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, S. 2007. The Museum Effect: Visiting Collections of Anatomy and Natural History in Victorian Britain. In Science in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-Century Sites and Experiences, ed. A. Fyfe and B. Lightman, 371–404. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, S.J.M. 2011. Morbid Curiosities. Medical Museums in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act. 1979. The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts Council. 2018. About Accreditation. https://www.artscouncil.org.uk/accreditation-scheme/about-accreditation. Accessed 27 August 2018.

  • Baillie, M. 1793. The Morbid Anatomy of the Most Important Parts of the Human Body. London: Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekvalac, J. 2012. Implementation of Preliminary Digital Radiographic Examination in the Confines of the Crypt of St Bride’s Church, Fleet Street, London. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the British Association for Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology, ed. P.D. Mitchell and J. Buckberry, 111–118. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekvalac, J. 2015. The Display of Archaeological Human Skeletal Remains in Museums. In Heritage, Ancestry and Law: Principles, Policies and Practices in Dealing with Historical Human Remains, ed. R. Redmond-Cooper, 114–121. Builth Wells: Institute of Art and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, A.C., and R.J. Berry. 1967. Epigenetic Variation in the Human Cranium. Journal of Anatomy 101: 361–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, M., and J. McKinley (eds.). 2004. Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains. Institute of Field Archaeologists Paper Number 7. Reading and Southampton: IFA and BABAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Association of Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology [BABAO]. 2010a. Code of Ethics. http://babao.org.uk/assets/Uploads/code-of-ethics.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2018.

  • British Association of Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology [BABAO]. 2010b. Code of Practice. http://www.babao.org.uk/assets/Uploads/code-of-practice.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2018.

  • British Museum Act. 1963. The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Museum. 2013. British Museum Policy: Human Remains in the Collection. https://www.britishmuseum.org/pdf/Human%20Remains%20policy%20July%202013%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 23 August 2018.

  • Buikstra, J., and D. Ubelaker (eds.). 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burial Act. 1857. The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Care of Cathedrals Measure. 2011. The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspari, R. 2003. From Types to Populations: A Century of Race, Physical Anthropology, and the American Anthropological Association. American Anthropologist 105: 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, S. 2005. John Hunter and the Anatomy of a Museum. History Today 55 (2): 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collections Trust. 2017. Spectrum. https://collectionstrust.org.uk/spectrum/. Accessed 29 May 2018.

  • Collier, R. 2010. Cadaver Shows Stir Controversy. Canadian Medical Association Journal 182 (14): E687–E688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comas, J. 1961. “Scientific” Racism Again? Current Anthropology 2: 303–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlogue, G., M. Viner, R. Beckett, et al. 2016. A Post-mortem Evaluation of the Degree of Mobility in an Individual with Severe Kyphoscoliosis Using Direct Digital Radiography (DDR) and Multi-detector Computed Tomography (MDCT). In New Developments in the Bioarchaeology of Care: Further Case Studies and Extended Theory, ed. L. Tilley and A. Schrenk, 153–173. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, B., and P. Rauxloh. 2003. A Rapid Method for Recording Human Skeletal Data. London: Museum of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, R., T. Kausmally, and J. Bekvalac. 2008. Late 17th- to 19th-Century Burial and Earlier Occupation at All Saints, Chelsea Old Church, Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. London: Museum of London Archaeology Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. 1996. Life and Death in Spitalfields 1700 to 1850. York: Council for British Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport [DCMS]. 2003. The Report of the Working Group on Human Remains. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport [DCMS]. 2005. Guidance for the Care of Human Remains in Museums. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disused Burial Grounds Act. 1884. The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disused Burial Grounds (Amendment) Act. 1981. The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. 2011. Matthew Baillie: Pioneer of Systematic Pathology. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 72 (10): 594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gapert, R., S. Black, and J. Last. 2009a. Sex Determination from the Foramen Magnum: Discriminant Function Analysis in an Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century British Sample. International Journal of Legal Medicine 123: 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gapert, R., S. Black, and J. Last. 2009b. Sex Determination from the Occipital Condyle: Discriminant Function Analysis in an Eighteenth and Nineteenth Century British Sample. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 138: 384–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesen, M. 2013. Introduction: Human Remains in the United Kingdom. In Curating Human Remains: Caring for the Dead in the United Kingdom, ed. M. Giesen, 1–11. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, C.Y., and F.A. Cardoso (eds.). 2018. Identified Skeletal Collections: The Testing Ground of Anthropology? Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, M., A. Miles, D. Walker, et al. 2013. ‘He Being Dead Yet Speaketh’: Excavations at Three Post-Medieval Burial Grounds in Tower Hamlets, East London, 2004–2010. London: Museum of London Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K. 2016. Souvenirs: Narrating Overseas Violence in the Late Nineteenth Century. In Britain and the Narration of Travel in the Nineteenth Century, ed. K. Hill, 175–186. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Tissue Act. 2004. The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Tissue (Scotland) Act. 2006. The Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Tissue Authority. 2017a. Relevant Material Under the Human Tissue Act 2004. https://www.hta.gov.uk/policies/relevant-material-under-human-tissue-act-2004. Accessed 27 August 2018.

  • Human Tissue Authority. 2017b. Human Tissue Act. https://www.hta.gov.uk/policies/human-tissue-act-2004. Accessed 27 August 2018.

  • Human Tissue Authority. 2017c. Code of Practice A: Guiding Principles and the Fundamental Principle of Consent. London: Human Tissue Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Tissue Authority. 2017d. Code of Practice C: Anatomical Examination. Code of Practice and Standards. London: Human Tissue Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Tissue Authority. 2017e. HTA Codes of Practice and Standards. https://www.hta.gov.uk/hta-codes-practice-and-standards-0. Accessed 27 August 2018.

  • Human Tissue Authority. 2017f. Code of Practice D: Public Display. Code of Practice and Standards. London: Human Tissue Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Tissue Authority. 2017g. Find an Establishment. https://www.hta.gov.uk/establishments. Accessed 27 August 2018.

  • Human Tissue Authority. 2017h. HTA Licence Fees 2018/19. https://www.hta.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Fees/tables2018-19_0.pdf. Accessed 27 August 2018.

  • Humphrey, L.T. 1998. Growth Patterns in the Modern Human Skeleton. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 105: 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, T., L.T. Humphrey, and S. Hillson. 2005. Linear Enamel Hypoplasias as Indicators of Systemic Physiological Stress: Evidence from Two Known Age-at-Death and Sex Populations from Post Medieval London. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 128: 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T. 2015. Human Remains as ‘Artistic Expression’ and the Common Law Offence of Outraging Public Decency: ‘Human Earrings’, Human Rights and R.V. Gibson Revisited. In Heritage, Ancestry and Law: Principles, Policies and Practices in dealing with Historical Human Remains, ed. R. Redmond-Cooper, 60–82. Builth Wells: Institute of Art and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J. 1995. Human Biodiversity: Genes, Race, and History. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays, S., M. Brickely, and N. Dodwell. 2004. Human Bones from Archaeological Sites: Guidelines for Producing Assessment Documents and Analytical Reports. Swindon: English Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical Research Council. 2014. MRCS Ethics Series: Human Tissue and Biological Samples for Use in Research: Operational and Ethical Guidelines. Swindon and London: Medical Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, A., W. White, and D. Tankard. 2008. Burial at the Site of the Parish Church of St Benet Sherehog Before and After the Great Fire: Excavations at 1 Poultry. London: Museum of London Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S., and V. Tranter. 2010. Research Into Issues Surrounding Human Bones in Museums. London: Business Development Research Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, G. 1997. St. Bride’s Church London: Archaeological Research 1952–60 and 1992–5. London: English Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P.D., C. Boston, A.T. Chamberlain, et al. 2011. The Study of Anatomy in England from 1700 to the Early 20th Century. Journal of Anatomy 219: 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P.D., and M. Brickley. 2017. Updated Guidelines to the Standards for Recording Human Remains. Reading: Chartered Institute for Archaeologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molleson, T., M. Cox, A.H. Waldron, et al. 1993. The Spitalfields Project. Volume 2: The Anthropology—The Middling Sort. York: Council for British Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. 1999. Fluid Preservation. In Care and Conservation of Natural History Collections, ed. D. Carter and A. Walker, 92–132. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. 1973. Phoenix of Fleet Street: 2000 Years of St Bride’s. London: Charles Knight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Museum Ethnographers Group [MEG]. 1991. Museum Ethnographers’ Group Guidelines on Management of Human Remains. Bawburgh: Museum Ethnographers Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Museum Ethnographers Group [MEG]. 1994. Professional Guidelines Concerning The Storage, Display, Interpretation and Return of Human Remains in Ethnographical Collections in United Kingdom Museums. Journal of Museum Ethnography 6: 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Museum of London. 2011. Policy for the Care of Human Remains in Museum of London Collections. London: Museum of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Museums Galleries Scotland. 2011. Guidelines for the Care of Human Remains in Scottish Museum Collections. Edinburgh: Museums Galleries Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural History Museum. 2014. Human Remains Policy. London: Natural History Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural History Museum. 2017. London Human Remains Collection. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/our-science/collections/palaeontology-collections/london-human-remains-collection.html. Accessed 23 August 2018.

  • Palfreyman, D. 2010. London Livery Companies: History, Law and Customs. Southend-on-Sea: Oracle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfern, R.C., and J. Bekvalac. 2013. The Museum of London: An Overview of Policies and Practice. In Curating Human Remains: Caring for the Dead in Great Britain, ed. M. Giesen, 87–98. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redpath, W. 1959. Fleet Street’s Church Restored, 1940–1957: A Survey of Seventeen Eventful Years, 2nd ed. London: Guild of St. Bride on Behalf of the Rector and Churchwardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., and M. Adams. 1993. The Spitalfields Project. Volume 1: The Archaeology—Across the Styx. York: Council for British Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relethford, J. 2010. Race and Conflicts Within the Profession of Physical Anthropology During the 1950s and 1960s. In Histories of American Physical Anthropology in the Twentieth Century, ed. M.A. Little and K.R. Kennedy, 207–219. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C.A. 2009. Human Remains in Archaeology: A Handbook. York: Council for British Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Albert Memorial Museum and Art Gallery. 2016. World Cultures: Curating Human Remains in the UK Conference. http://rammworldcultures.org.uk/curating-human-remains-uk-conference/. Accessed 29 May 2018.

  • Scheuer, J.L. 1998. Age at Death and Cause of Death of the People Buried at St. Bride’s Church, Fleet Street. In Grave Concerns: Death and Burial in England 1700–1850, ed. M. Cox, 100–111. York: Council for British Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuer, J.L., and J.E. Bowman. 1994. The Health of the Novelist and Printer Samuel Richardson (1689–1761): A Correlation of Documentary and Skeletal Evidence. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 87: 352–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, J.E. 2014. Fluid Preservation. A Comprehensive Guide. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Town and Country Planning (Churches, Places of Religious Worship and Burial Grounds) Regulations. 1950. The Stationery Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuffs, A. 2003. Von Hagens Faces Investigation Over Use of Bodies Without Consent. British Medical Journal 327: 1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, K., R. Eisenberg, J. Bekvalac, et al. 2017. The Radiologist in the Crypt: Burden of Disease in the Past and Its Modern Relevance. Academic Radiology 24 (10): 1305–1311.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E. 2011. Giving Up the Dead: The Impact and Effectiveness of the Human Tissue Act and the Guidance for the Care of Human Remains in English Museums. Dissertation, Newcastle University.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E. 2013. The Human Tissue Act and The Guidance. In Curating Human Remains: Caring for the Dead in the United Kingdom, ed. M. Giesen, 43–52. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A.S. 2014. Digitised Diseases: Preserving Precious Remains. Journal of the British Archaeological Association 136: 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, C. 2013. Care Custody and Display. In Curating Human Remains: Caring for the Dead in the United Kingdom, ed. M. Giesen, 31–41. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK

    Heather Bonney

  2. Centre for Human Bioarchaeology, Museum of London, 150 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5HN, UK

    Jelena Bekvalac

  3. Royal College of Surgeons of England, 35-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE, UK

    Carina Phillips

Authors
  1. Heather Bonney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jelena Bekvalac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carina Phillips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Bonney .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Policing and Forensics, Staffordshire University, Science Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, UK

    Kirsty Squires

  2. Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, UK

    David Errickson

  3. Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, UK

    Nicholas Márquez-Grant

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bonney, H., Bekvalac, J., Phillips, C. (2019). Human Remains in Museum Collections in the United Kingdom. In: Squires, K., Errickson, D., Márquez-Grant, N. (eds) Ethical Approaches to Human Remains. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32926-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation