Abstract
The rainbow flag has, over time, become a widespread and almost universally known sign for the gay community. It testifies to a visibility gained in many countries in recent decades, and even if it remains relative and fragile, it constitutes an appropriation of public space by homosexuals. More tolerance and openness certainly characterize the current context of Western societies especially in urban areas, but it would be wrong to confuse public visibility of homosexuals, still relative, and social progress, still chaotic, when it comes to their rights. Neither coming out, nor pride marches with rainbow flags, nor subversive performances can deconstruct the heterosexual norms that govern the public space and challenge the hierarchies that exist there. Furthermore, in recent years the figure of the rainbow has been rejected by radical gay groups that consider it a symbol of a collective, commodified, and a priori white identity, consenting minimum consideration to diversity. The rainbow flag stands today at a crossroad were its semiotic function as index, symbol, and icon, according to Pierces terminology, is being challenge from all sides.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alm E, Martinsson L (2016) The rainbow flag as friction: transnational, imagined communities of belonging among Pakistani LGBTQ activists. Cult Unbound 8(3):218–239
Altman D (1996) On global queering. Australian Humanities Review. http://www.lib.latrobe.edu.au/AHR/archive/Issue-July-1996/altman.html#1. Accessed 05 June 2019
Anderson B (2002) L’imaginaire national: réflexions sur l’origine et l’essor du nationalisme. La Découverte-poche, Paris
Antonelli P, Millar Fischer M (2015) MoMA acquires the rainbow flag. http://www.moma.org/explore/inside_out/2015/06/17/moma-acquires-the-rainbow-flag. Accessed 20 Nov 2018
Armstrong E (2002) Forging Gay identities: organizing sexuality in San Francisco 1950–1994. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Avicolli Meca T (2011) Sometimes you word with the democrats, and sometimes you riot. In: Carlsson C (ed) Ten years that shook the city: San Francisco 1968–1978. City Lights Foundation Books, San Francisco, pp 183–191
Bajoit G (1999) Notes sur la construction de l’identité personnelle. Recherches sociologiques 2:69–84
Bajoit G (ed) (2000) Jeunesse et société. La socialisation des jeunes dans un monde en mutation. De Boeck, Bruxelles
Beckson K (2000) Oscar Wilde and the green carnation. English Literature in Transition, vol 43, pp 387, 397
Bourdieu P (1998) La domination masculine. Seuil, Paris
Brantley B (1994) Critics’ notebook. Why Oz is a state of mind in Gay life and drag shows. The New York City Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/28/movies/critic-s-notebook-why-oz-is-a-state-of-mind-in-gay-life-and-drag-shows.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm. Accessed 18 May 2019
Broqua AC, De Busscher P-O (2003) La crise de la normalisation: expérience et condition sociales de l’homosexualité en France. In: Broqua AC, Souteyrand Y, Lertf F (eds) Homosexualités au temps du sida: tensions sociales et identitaires. ANRS, Paris, pp 19–33
Broqua C (2005) Agir pour ne pas mourir. Act Up, les homosexuels et le sida. Presses universitaires de Science Po, Paris
Browne K (2007) (Re)making the other, heterosexualising everyday space. Environ Plan A 39(4):996–1014
Butler JP (1999) Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, New York and London
Camilleri C (ed) (1990) Stratégies identitaires. PUF, Paris
Campbell G (ed) (2006) The Grove encyclopedia of decorative arts. Oxford University Press, New York, see “Textile”
Carter D (2010) Stonewall the riots that sparked the Gay revolution. Griffin, New York
Darbon D (1997) La nouvelle Afrique du Sud. Hérodote, revue de géographie et de géopolitique 82(3):5
Duffy N (2016) Sweden’s stamps are turning rainbow to celebrate pride. Pink News, March 30. http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2016/03/30/swedens-stamps-areturning-rainbow-to-celebrate-pride/10.3310/hta20400. Accessed 13 June 2019
Durkheim E (2005) Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Presses universitaires de France, Paris (First Edition 1912)
Eco U (1985) Producing signs. In: Blonsky M (ed) On signs. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp 176–183
Encarnación OG (2016) The troubled rise of Gay rights diplomacy. Current History, New York, pp 17–22
Escoffier J (1997) The political economy of the closet. Notes toward an economic history of Gay and Lesbian life before Stonewall. In: Gluckman A, Reed B (dir) Homo economics: capitalism, community, and Lesbian and Gay life, pp 123–134
Gay Shame (2004) Second Annual Gay Shame Awards. http://www.gayshamesf.org/awards.htm. Accessed 10 May 2019
Goffman E (1975) Stigmate. Minuit, Paris. First edition 1963
Haeberle EJ (1981) Swastika, pink triangle and yellow star: the destruction of sexologyand the persecution of homosexuals in Nazi Germany. J Sex Res:270–187
Herscher E (1998) Castro’s change: anti-begging drive splits area known for tolerance. San Francisco Chronicle. https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Castro-s-Change-Anti-begging-drive-splits-area-3005984.php. Accessed 6 May 2019
Hilson M (2018) The International Co-operative Alliance and the Consumer Co-operative Movement in Northern Europe. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Hitchens R (1895) The green carnation. D. Appleton and Company, New York
Horincq R (2004) Diversité des orientations sexuelles, question de genre et promotion de la santé. Éducation Santé, n. 194
Johnston L (2001) (Other) bodies and tourism studies. Ann Tour Res 28(1):180–201
Klapeer CM, Laskar P (2018) Transnational ways of belonging and queer ways of being. Exploring transnationalism through the trajectories of the rainbow flag. Identities 25(5):524–541
Knowlton S (2012) Applying Sebeok’s typology of signs to the study of flags. Raven 19:57–97
Lamula P (2004) La Bandera del Tahuantinsuyo. Boletín n. 59. http://www4.congreso.gob.pe/participa/documentos/boletin23062004.pdf. Accessed 03 Mar 2019
Laskar P, Johansson A, Mulinari D (2016) Decolonising the rainbow flag. Cult Unbound 8(3):193–216. http://www.cultureunbound.ep.liu.se. Accessed 18 May 2019
Le Figaro (2018) Homophobie: plus de 50% des LGBT victimes d’agressions. http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2018/06/27/97001-20180627FILWWW00055-homophobie-plus-de-50-des-lgbt-victimes-d-agressions.php. Accessed 2 Feb 2019
Leroy S (2010) La Gay Pride pour s’approprier l’espace public et contester la norme hétérosexuelle. 1eres journées du pôle “Ville” de l’Université Paris-Est, Jan 2010, Marne-la-Vallée, France. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00450265/document. Accessed 12 May 2019
Marche G (2001) Homosexualité et ethnicité: rupture et recomposition d’un modèle identitaire. In: Prum M (ed) La Peau de l’autre. Syllepse, Paris, pp 109–129
Marche G (2005) L’arc-en-ciel et le mouvement gai et lesbien » Transatlantica http://journals.openedition.org/transatlantica/321. Accessed 6 May 2019, pp 1–22
Mellini L (2009) Entre normalisation et hétéronormativité: La construction de l’identité homosexuelle. Médecine & Hygiène 33(1):3–26
MG (2017) Gay Pride: d’où vient le drapeau arc-en-ciel, emblème de la communauté LGBT ? L’Obs. https://www.nouvelobs.com/societe/20170623.OBS1118/gay-pride-d-ou-vient-le-drapeau-arc-en-ciel-embleme-de-la-communaute-lgbt.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2019
Miller N (1995) Out of the past: Gay and Lesbian history from 1869 to the present. Vintage, New York, pp 395–411
NBC News (2016) How the pride rainbow flag came to be. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_bzpr2jalQ. Accessed 12 Dec 2018
Pasch G (1983) Semiotic vexillology: the logical structure of flags. Flag Bull 22(3–4):141–157
Peirce CS (2010) Sundry logical conceptions. In: Stjernfelt F, Bundgaard PF (eds) Semiotics: critical concepts in language studies. Routledge, New York, pp 73–95
Plant R (2011) The pink triangle: the Nazi war against homosexuals. Henry Holt and Company, New York
Puar J (2013) Rethinking homonationalism. Int J Middle East Stud 45:336–339
Sebeok TA (1994) Signs: an introduction to semiotics. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Sedgwick EK (1990) Epistemology of the closet. University of California Press, Berkeley
Shea C (2009) Redesign the Gay-Pride Flag? The Boston Globe. http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2009/06/redesign_the_ga.html. Accessed 1 May 2019
Star LS, Griesemer J (1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):387–420
The United States Department of Justice (2017) Hate Crime Statistics. https://www.justice.gov/hatecrimes/hate-crime-statistics. Accessed 4 June 2019
Thrift N (2007) Non-representational theory. Routledge, London
Tin L-G (2008) L’invention de la culture hétérosexuelle. Autrement, Paris
Ultra-Violet (2004) Marriage is still the opiate of the queers. April–May 2004. http://www.lagai.org/. Accessed 5 June 2019
Valentine G (1993) (Hetero)sexing space: lesbian perceptions and experiences of everyday spaces. EPD: Soc Space 11(4):395–413
Voegtli M (2004) Du jeu dans le je: ruptures biographiques et travail de mise en cohérence. Lien social et Politiques 51:145–158
Young I (1990) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Yuval Davies N (2006) Belonging and the politics of belonging. Patterns Prejudice 3:197–214
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hauksson-Tresch, N. (2021). The Rainbow Flag as Signal, Icon, Index and Symbol of Collective and Individual Gay Identity. In: Wagner, A., Marusek, S. (eds) Flags, Color, and the Legal Narrative. Law and Visual Jurisprudence, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32865-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32865-8_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32864-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32865-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)