Skip to main content

Promoting Societal Resilience to Cascading Risk and Concurrencies

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies

Abstract

Climate change is not just about modeling and understanding hazards or weather. Societal resilience has to consider wider systemic dynamics and to explore how risks interact for going beyond the existing approaches to adaptation. It is a matter of understanding the root causes of problems, promoting strategic efforts that could be efficient and feasible.

This chapter offers a reference point for scholars and practitioners who are approaching the management of complex systems and are willing to explore the implications for business as usual. At the same time, it builds evidence to support experienced readers in going beyond silo thinking and conventional wisdom. Examples and theories are used together to propose that climate-resilient societies need shifting toward the understanding of common points of failures between different threats and promoting effective multi-sectoral partnerships.

The sections are developed to progress in complementary steps. Are there any lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic that could be applied for promoting climate-resilient societies? What is cascading risk and how does it relate to concurrent and compounding events? What can be learned from the field? Are there differences between remote and urban areas? The discussion proposes a reflection on how limitations in timescales, budgets, and operational capacity could affect resilience, offering an approach to move beyond the status quo and promoting societal resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, D. E. (2000). Confronting catastrophe: New perspectives on natural disasters. Harpenden: Terra Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. E. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 2707–2716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. E. (2017). How to write an emergency plan. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, N. G., & LysgÃ¥rd, H. K. (2002). Rural development and policies: The case of post-war Norway. In K. Halfacree, I. Kovách, & R. Woodward (Eds.), Leadership and local power in European rural development (pp. 255–272). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocco, G. (2016). Remoteness and remote places. A geographic perspective. Geoforum, 77, 178–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, L., Schueller, L. A., Scolobig, A., & Marx, S. (2020). Stakeholder solutions for building interdisciplinary and international synergies between Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 46, 101616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casajus Valles, A., Marin Ferrer, M., PoljanÅ¡ek, K., & Clark, I. (Eds.). (2020) Science for disaster risk management 2020: Acting today, protecting tomorrow. EUR 30183 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-76-18181-1. https://doi.org/10.2760/438998, JRC114026.

  • Clark-Ginsberg, A., Rueda, I. A., Monken, J., Liu, J., & Chen, H. (2020). Maintaining critical infrastructure resilience to natural hazards during the COVID-19 pandemic: Hurricane preparations by US energy companies. Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience, 1(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Climate Change. (2019). Progress in preparing for climate change Report to Parliament. Committee on Climate Change. www.theccc.org.uk/publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commoner, B. (1971). The closing circle. Nature, man, and technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, C. B. (Ed.). (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J. C., & Malamud, B. D. (2014). Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards. Reviews of Geophysics, 52(4), 680–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLA. (2018). The London food strategy. London, UK: London City Hall. https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/final_london_food_strategy.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLA. (2020). London resilience strategy. London, UK: London City Hall. www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/fire-and-resilience/london-city-resilience-strategy.

    Google Scholar 

  • GLA. (2021). The London Plan. The spatial development strategy for Greater London. London, UK: London City Hall. www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/the_london_plan_2021.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz, M. H. (1994a). Creeping environmental problems. The World & I, June (pp. 218–225).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz, M. H. (1994b). Creeping environmental phenomena: Are societies equipped to deal with them? In M. H. Glantz (Ed.), Creeping environmental phenomena and societal responses to them, proceedings of workshop held 7–10 February 1994 in Boulder, Colorado (pp. 1–10). Boulder: NCAR/ESIG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M., & Williams, S. (2020). Why does understanding the systemic nature of risk matter in the midst of COVID-19? www.preventionweb.net/news/view/71228

  • Hewitt, K. (1995). Excluded perspectives in the social construction of disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 13, 317–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, M. (2013). Anytown: Final report. London, UK: London Resilience and LCCP, London City Hall. https://climatelondon.org/projects/understanding-the-ripple-effect-anytown/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, W., Trump, B., Love, P., & Linkov, I. (2020). Bouncing forward: A resilience approach to dealing with COVID-19 and future systemic shocks. Environment Systems and Decisions, 40, 174–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response’s. (2021). COVID-19: Make it the last pandemic by the independent panel for pandemic preparedness & response. https://theindependentpanel.org/

  • IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Geneva: IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, I. (2020). COVID-19: What is the disaster? Social Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12890.

  • Krausmann, E., Andersson, E., Gibbs, M., & Murtagh, W. (2016). Space weather & critical infrastructures: Findings and outlook. EUR 28237 EN, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2788/152877.

  • LCCP. (2020). COVID-19 and heatwave: Managing concurrent risks. Meeting report. http://climatelondon.org/previous/covid-19-and-heatwave-managing-concurrent-risks/

  • Linkov, I., Bridges, T., Creutzig, F., Decker, J., Fox-Lent, C., Kröger, W., … & Thiel-Clemen, T. (2014). Changing the resilience paradigm. Nature Climate Change, 4(6), 407–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., & Hynes, W. (2019). Resilience strategies and policies to contain systemic threats. OECD, SG/NAEC (2019)5. https://www.oecd.org/naec/averting-systemic-collapse

  • Manzanedo, R. D., & Manning, P. (2020). COVID-19: Lessons for the climate change emergency. Science of the Total Environment, 742, 140563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2018). Climate-resilient Infrastructure (OECD environment policy papers, 14). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/4fdf9eaf-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, K., Riva, M., Dufresne, P., & Fletcher, C. (2020). Overcrowding and sense of home in the Canadian Arctic. Housing Studies, 35(2), 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescaroli, G. (2018). Perceptions of cascading risk and interconnected failures in emergency planning: Implications for operational resilience and policy making. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 30, 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pescaroli, G., & Alexander, D. (2016). Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters. Natural Hazards, 82(1), 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pescaroli, G., & Alexander, D. (2018). Understanding compound, interconnected, interacting, and cascading risks: A holistic framework. Risk Analysis, 38(11), 2245–2257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pescaroli, G., Wicks, R. T., Giacomello, G., & Alexander, D. E. (2018). Increasing resilience to cascading events: The M. OR. D. OR. scenario. Safety Science, 110, 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pescaroli, G., Galbusera, L., Cardarilli, M., Giannopoulos, G., & Alexander, D. (2021). Linking healthcare and societal resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic. Safety Science, 140, 105291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petermann, T., Bradke, H., Lüllmann, A., Poetzsch, M., & Riehm, U. (2011). What happens during a blackout. Berlin: Office of Technology Assessment at the German Bunderstag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Academy of Engineering. (2016). Living without electricity: One city’s experience of coping with loss of power. London, UK: RAE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. H., Peters, S., Bakhshi, V., Bowen, A., Cameron, C., Catovsky, S., … Zenghelis, D. (2006). Stern review: The economics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDRR. (2017a). Terminology. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDRR. (2017b). Disaster resilience scorecard for cities. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDRR. (2019). Global risk assessment report 2019. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. UNDRR 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardekker, J. A., van der Sluijs, J. P., Janssen, P. H. M., Kloprogge, P., & Petersen, A. C. (2008). Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: Views from the Dutch science- policy interface. Environmental Science and Policy, 11(7), 627–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Pescaroli .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Pescaroli, G., Guida, K., Kelman, I. (2021). Promoting Societal Resilience to Cascading Risk and Concurrencies. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32811-5_125-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32811-5_125-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32811-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32811-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics