Abstract
Climate change is not just about modeling and understanding hazards or weather. Societal resilience has to consider wider systemic dynamics and to explore how risks interact for going beyond the existing approaches to adaptation. It is a matter of understanding the root causes of problems, promoting strategic efforts that could be efficient and feasible.
This chapter offers a reference point for scholars and practitioners who are approaching the management of complex systems and are willing to explore the implications for business as usual. At the same time, it builds evidence to support experienced readers in going beyond silo thinking and conventional wisdom. Examples and theories are used together to propose that climate-resilient societies need shifting toward the understanding of common points of failures between different threats and promoting effective multi-sectoral partnerships.
The sections are developed to progress in complementary steps. Are there any lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic that could be applied for promoting climate-resilient societies? What is cascading risk and how does it relate to concurrent and compounding events? What can be learned from the field? Are there differences between remote and urban areas? The discussion proposes a reflection on how limitations in timescales, budgets, and operational capacity could affect resilience, offering an approach to move beyond the status quo and promoting societal resilience.
References
Alexander, D. E. (2000). Confronting catastrophe: New perspectives on natural disasters. Harpenden: Terra Publishing.
Alexander, D. E. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 2707–2716.
Alexander, D. E. (2017). How to write an emergency plan. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.
Berg, N. G., & Lysgård, H. K. (2002). Rural development and policies: The case of post-war Norway. In K. Halfacree, I. Kovách, & R. Woodward (Eds.), Leadership and local power in European rural development (pp. 255–272). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bocco, G. (2016). Remoteness and remote places. A geographic perspective. Geoforum, 77, 178–181.
Booth, L., Schueller, L. A., Scolobig, A., & Marx, S. (2020). Stakeholder solutions for building interdisciplinary and international synergies between Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 46, 101616.
Casajus Valles, A., Marin Ferrer, M., Poljanšek, K., & Clark, I. (Eds.). (2020) Science for disaster risk management 2020: Acting today, protecting tomorrow. EUR 30183 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-76-18181-1. https://doi.org/10.2760/438998, JRC114026.
Clark-Ginsberg, A., Rueda, I. A., Monken, J., Liu, J., & Chen, H. (2020). Maintaining critical infrastructure resilience to natural hazards during the COVID-19 pandemic: Hurricane preparations by US energy companies. Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience, 1(1), 1–6.
Committee on Climate Change. (2019). Progress in preparing for climate change Report to Parliament. Committee on Climate Change. www.theccc.org.uk/publications.
Commoner, B. (1971). The closing circle. Nature, man, and technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Field, C. B. (Ed.). (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: Special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gill, J. C., & Malamud, B. D. (2014). Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards. Reviews of Geophysics, 52(4), 680–722.
GLA. (2018). The London food strategy. London, UK: London City Hall. https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/final_london_food_strategy.pdf.
GLA. (2020). London resilience strategy. London, UK: London City Hall. www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/fire-and-resilience/london-city-resilience-strategy.
GLA. (2021). The London Plan. The spatial development strategy for Greater London. London, UK: London City Hall. www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/the_london_plan_2021.pdf.
Glantz, M. H. (1994a). Creeping environmental problems. The World & I, June (pp. 218–225).
Glantz, M. H. (1994b). Creeping environmental phenomena: Are societies equipped to deal with them? In M. H. Glantz (Ed.), Creeping environmental phenomena and societal responses to them, proceedings of workshop held 7–10 February 1994 in Boulder, Colorado (pp. 1–10). Boulder: NCAR/ESIG.
Gordon, M., & Williams, S. (2020). Why does understanding the systemic nature of risk matter in the midst of COVID-19? www.preventionweb.net/news/view/71228
Hewitt, K. (1995). Excluded perspectives in the social construction of disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 13, 317–339.
Hogan, M. (2013). Anytown: Final report. London, UK: London Resilience and LCCP, London City Hall. https://climatelondon.org/projects/understanding-the-ripple-effect-anytown/.
Hynes, W., Trump, B., Love, P., & Linkov, I. (2020). Bouncing forward: A resilience approach to dealing with COVID-19 and future systemic shocks. Environment Systems and Decisions, 40, 174–184.
Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response’s. (2021). COVID-19: Make it the last pandemic by the independent panel for pandemic preparedness & response. https://theindependentpanel.org/
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Geneva: IPCC.
Kelman, I. (2020). COVID-19: What is the disaster? Social Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12890.
Krausmann, E., Andersson, E., Gibbs, M., & Murtagh, W. (2016). Space weather & critical infrastructures: Findings and outlook. EUR 28237 EN, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2788/152877.
LCCP. (2020). COVID-19 and heatwave: Managing concurrent risks. Meeting report. http://climatelondon.org/previous/covid-19-and-heatwave-managing-concurrent-risks/
Linkov, I., Bridges, T., Creutzig, F., Decker, J., Fox-Lent, C., Kröger, W., … & Thiel-Clemen, T. (2014). Changing the resilience paradigm. Nature Climate Change, 4(6), 407–409.
Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., & Hynes, W. (2019). Resilience strategies and policies to contain systemic threats. OECD, SG/NAEC (2019)5. https://www.oecd.org/naec/averting-systemic-collapse
Manzanedo, R. D., & Manning, P. (2020). COVID-19: Lessons for the climate change emergency. Science of the Total Environment, 742, 140563.
OECD. (2018). Climate-resilient Infrastructure (OECD environment policy papers, 14). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/4fdf9eaf-en.
Perreault, K., Riva, M., Dufresne, P., & Fletcher, C. (2020). Overcrowding and sense of home in the Canadian Arctic. Housing Studies, 35(2), 353–375.
Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pescaroli, G. (2018). Perceptions of cascading risk and interconnected failures in emergency planning: Implications for operational resilience and policy making. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 30, 269–280.
Pescaroli, G., & Alexander, D. (2016). Critical infrastructure, panarchies and the vulnerability paths of cascading disasters. Natural Hazards, 82(1), 175–192.
Pescaroli, G., & Alexander, D. (2018). Understanding compound, interconnected, interacting, and cascading risks: A holistic framework. Risk Analysis, 38(11), 2245–2257.
Pescaroli, G., Wicks, R. T., Giacomello, G., & Alexander, D. E. (2018). Increasing resilience to cascading events: The M. OR. D. OR. scenario. Safety Science, 110, 131–140.
Pescaroli, G., Galbusera, L., Cardarilli, M., Giannopoulos, G., & Alexander, D. (2021). Linking healthcare and societal resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic. Safety Science, 140, 105291.
Petermann, T., Bradke, H., Lüllmann, A., Poetzsch, M., & Riehm, U. (2011). What happens during a blackout. Berlin: Office of Technology Assessment at the German Bunderstag.
Royal Academy of Engineering. (2016). Living without electricity: One city’s experience of coping with loss of power. London, UK: RAE.
Stern, N. H., Peters, S., Bakhshi, V., Bowen, A., Cameron, C., Catovsky, S., … Zenghelis, D. (2006). Stern review: The economics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
UNDRR. (2017a). Terminology. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
UNDRR. (2017b). Disaster resilience scorecard for cities. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.
UNDRR. (2019). Global risk assessment report 2019. Geneva: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. UNDRR 2017.
Wardekker, J. A., van der Sluijs, J. P., Janssen, P. H. M., Kloprogge, P., & Petersen, A. C. (2008). Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: Views from the Dutch science- policy interface. Environmental Science and Policy, 11(7), 627–641.
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Pescaroli, G., Guida, K., Kelman, I. (2021). Promoting Societal Resilience to Cascading Risk and Concurrencies. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32811-5_125-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32811-5_125-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32811-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32811-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences