Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How to Give a Lecture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Roberts Academic Medicine Handbook

Abstract

Lecturing continues to be an important method of teaching within medical education. This chapter provides guidelines to help educators develop an effective lecture, starting with understanding pertinent aspects of learning theory that inform the foundation of an effective lecture. The chapter outlines the preparation phase, key components of the lecture, and a consideration of methods for evaluating the lecture. It concludes with a discussion of novel uses of the modified lecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. General Medical Council. Tomorrow’s doctors. Recommendations on undergraduate medical education, vol. 2. London: General Medical Council; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Costa ML, van Rensburg L, Rushton N. Does teaching style matter? A randomized trial of group discussion versus lecturers in orthopedic undergraduate teaching. Med Educ. 2007;41:214–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prober CG, Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures – a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1657–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vaccani JP, Javidnia H, Humphrey-Murto S. The effectiveness of webcast compared to live lectures as a teaching tool in medical school. Med Teach. 2016;38:59–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Association of American Medical Colleges. Medical Schools Reporting Use of Selected Teaching Formats in 2013–14, by Topic Area. Curriculum Inventory Reports. https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/cir/406470/06c.html. Accessed 26 Sept 2018.

  6. Gulpinar MA, Yegen BC. Interactive lecturing for meaningful learning in large groups. Med Teach. 2005;27(7):590–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller CJ, McNear J, Metz MJ. A comparison of traditional and engaging lecture methods in a large, professional-level course. Adv Physiol Educ. 2013;37:347–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 2002;41:212–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Paige JT, Khamis NN, Cooper JB. Learning how to “teach one:” a needs assessment of the state of faculty development within the Consortium of the american college of surgeons accredited education institutes. Surgery. 2017;162(5):1140–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeGolia SG, Cagande CC, Ahn MS, Cullins LM, Walaszek A, Cowley DS. Faculty development for teaching faculty in psychiatry: where we are and what we need. Acad Psychiatry. 2019;43(2):184–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bligh DA. What’s the use of lectures? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cardall S, Krupat E, Ulrich M. Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Acad Med. 2008;83(12):1174–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fyrenius A, Bergdahl B, Silen C. Lectures in problem-based learning—why, when and how? An example of interactive lecturing that stimulates meaningful learning. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):61–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Knowles MS. The adult learner: a neglected species. 3rd ed. Gulf: Houston; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brown G, Manogue M. AMEE Medical Education Guide No 22. Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers. Med Teach. 2001;23:231–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Issa N, Mayer RE, Schuller M, Wang E, Shapiro MB, DaRosa DA. Teaching for understanding in medical classrooms using multimedia design principles. Med Educ. 2013;47:388–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baycan Z, Nacar M. Learning styles of first year medical students attending Erciyes University in Kayseri, Turkey. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007;31(2):158–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Price L. Lecturers’ vs. students’ perceptions of the accessibility of instructional materials. Instr Sci. 2007;35(4):317–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duffy RM, Guerandel A, Casey P, Malone K, Kelly BD. Experiences of using Prezi in psychiatry teaching. Acad Psychiatry. 2015;39(6):615–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. AAMC Institute for Improving Medical Education. Colloquium on Educational Technology: Recommendations and Guidelines for Medical Educators. 2007. Effective use of educational technology in medical education. URL: https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Effective%20Use%20of%20Educational.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2018.

  21. Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning to medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44:543–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Collins J. Education techniques for lifelong learning: making a PowerPoint presentation. Radiographics. 2004;24:1177–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Burgoon JK, Birk T, Pfau M. Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Hum Commun Res. 1990;17:140–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Davis B. Delivering a lecture. In: Davis B, editor. Tools for teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fullwood C, Doherty-Sneddon G. Effect of gazing at the camera during a video link on recall. Appl Ergon. 2006;37(2):167–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Irby DM. Clinical teacher effectiveness in medicine. J Med Educ. 1978;53:808–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lucas CA, Benedek D, Pangaro L. Learning climate and students’ achievement in a medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 1993;68:811–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ernst H, Colthorpe K. The efficiency of interactive lecturing for students with diverse science backgrounds. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007;31:41–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ausubel D. Alternative theories of retention and forgetting. Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mayer R. Learning and instruction. New Jersey: Pearson Education; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brown GA, Armstrong S. On explaining. In: Wragg EC, editor. Classroom teaching skills. London: Croom Helm; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:8410–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Krupat E, Richards JB, Sullivan AM, Fleenor TJ Jr, Schwartzstein RM. Assessing the effectiveness of casebased collaborative learning via randomized controlled trial. Acad Med. 2016;91(5):723–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Prado HM, Falbo GH, Falbo AR, Figueiroa JN. Active learning on the ward: outcomes from a comparative trial with traditional methods. Med Educ. 2011;45:273–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sawatsky AP, Berlacher K, Graieri R. Using an ACTIVE teaching format versus a standard lecture format for increasing resident interaction and knowledge achievement during noon conference: a prospective, controlled study. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. White G. Interactive lecturing. Clin Teach. 2011;8:230–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thomas EJ. The variation of memory with time for information appearing during a lecture. Studies Adult Educ. 1972;4(1):57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ebert-May D, Brewer C, Allred S. Innovation in large lectures—teaching for active learning. Bioscience. 1997;47(9):601–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tomorrow’s professor. Improving the effectiveness of your lectures. MSG #495 guided notes. 2007. http://ctl.stanford.edu/TompProf/postings/495.html. Accessed 15 Nov 2011.

  40. Efstathiou N, Bailey C. Promoting active learning using audience response system in large bioscience classes. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32:91–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vital F. Creating a positive learning environment with the use of clickers in a high school chemistry classroom. J Chem Educ. 2012;89:470–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. King DB. Using clickers to identify the muddiest points in large chemistry classes. J Chem Educ. 2011;88:1485–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cotes S, Cotua J. Using audience response systems during in- teractive lectures to promote active learning and conceptual understanding of stoichiometry. J Chem Educ. 2014;91:673–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Caldwell JE. Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. Life Sci Educ. 2007;6(1):9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Plant JD. Incorporating an audience response system into veterinary dermatology lectures: effect on student knowledge retention and satisfaction. J Vet Med Educ. 2007;34:674–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pradhan A, Sparano D, Ananth CV. The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: an application to resident education. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stoddard HA, Piquette CA. A controlled study of improvements in student exam performance with the use of an audience response system during medical school lectures. Acad Med. 2010;85(10):s37–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kay RH, LeSage A. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: a review of the literature. Comput Educ. 2009;53:819–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pickering JD, Roberts DJH. Flipped classroom or an active lecture? Clin Anat. 2018;31:118–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. McClean S, Crowe W. Making room for interactivity: using the cloud-based audience response system Nearpod to enhance engagement in lectures. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017;364(6)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Carifa L, Goodin HJ. Using games to provide interactive peri- operative education. AORN J. 2011;94:370–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gipson M, Bear M. Enhancing learning a comparison of lecture and gaming outcomes. Nurse Educ. 2013;38(5):184–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Newman LR, Lown BA, Jones RN, Johansson A, Schwartzstein RM. Developing a peer assessment of lecturing instrument: lessons learned. Acad Med. 2009;84:1104–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sullivan RL, McIntosh N. Delivering effective lectures. JHPIEGO strategy paper #5. US Agency for International Development. 1996. www.jhpiego.jhu.edu. Accessed 15 Oct 2011.

  55. Brooksfeld S. Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Schon D. Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Gilboy MB, Heinerichs S, Pazzaglia G. Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015;47(1):109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, 2010 (https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf). Accessed 28 Oct 2018.

  59. Deslauriers L, Schelew E, Wieman C. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science. 2011;332:862–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Riddell J, Jhun P, Fung C, Comes J, Sawtelle S, Tabatabai R, et al. Does the flipped classroom improve learning in graduate medical education? J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9:491–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Bandla H, Franco RA, Simpson D, Brennan K, McKanry J, Bragg D. Assessing learning outcomes and cost effectiveness of an online sleep curriculum for medical students. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012;8(4):439–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Holmes C, Reid C. A comparison study of on-campus and online learning outcomes for a research methods course. J Counselor Preparation Supervision. 2017;9(2) https://doi.org/10.7729/92.1182. Accessed October 28, 2018.

  63. Varao-Sousa TL, Kingstone A. Memory for lectures: how lecture format impacts the learning experience. PLoS One. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141587. Accessed October 28, 2018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

    Sallie G. De Golia

Authors
  1. Sallie G. De Golia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sallie G. De Golia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA

    Laura Weiss Roberts

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Golia, S.G. (2020). How to Give a Lecture. In: Roberts, L. (eds) Roberts Academic Medicine Handbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31957-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31957-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31956-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31957-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation