Skip to main content

How to Engage Communities in Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Roberts Academic Medicine Handbook
  • 1221 Accesses

Abstract

Interest in community engagement has grown enormously over the past several decades. Although community-engaged scholarly work does not get the priority it deserves, it is increasingly being embraced by academic and funding institutions. Community engagement, however, remains a challenge for many academics, especially those who work in cross-cultural settings or with marginalized populations. This chapter examines the concept of community engagement and its complexities and describes some frameworks of community engagement and how academics can engage communities in research. It concludes with a brief overview of key ingredients and ethical considerations in the community engagement process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dharamsi S, Espinoza N, Cramer C, Amin M, Bainbridge L, Poole G. Nurturing social responsibility through community service-learning: Lessons learned from a pilot project. Medical Teacher. 2010;32(11):905–11. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590903434169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jongbloed B, Enders J, Salerno C. Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. High Educ. 2008;56(3):303–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9128-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowen F, Newenham-Kahindi A, Herremans I. When suits meet roots: the antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy. J Bus Ethics. 2010;95(2):297–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0360-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bringle RG, Hatcher JA. Campus-community partnerships: the terms of engagement. J Soc Issues. 2002;58(3):503–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindau ST, Makelarski JA, Chin MH, Desautels S, Johnson D, Johnson WE Jr, et al. Building community-engaged health research and discovery infrastructure on the South Side of Chicago: science in service to community priorities. Prev Med. 2011;52(3–4):200–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg-Freeman C, Kass N, Gielen A, Tracey P, Bates-Hopkins B, Farfel M. Faculty beliefs, perceptions, and level of community involvement in their research: a survey at one urban academic institution. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010;5(4):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mc Namara KP, George J, O’Reilly SL, Jackson SL, Peterson GM, Howarth H, et al. Engaging community pharmacists in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: protocol for the Pharmacist Assessment of Adherence, Risk and Treatment in Cardiovascular Disease (PAART CVD) pilot study. BMC Health Services Research. 2010;10:Artn 264. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee D, Newby H. The problem of sociology: an introduction to the discipline. London: Unwin Hyman; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Franz BA, Skinner D, Murphy JW. Defining “community” in community health evaluation: perspectives from a sample of nonprofit Appalachian hospitals. Am J Eval. 2018;39(2):237–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214017722857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mbiti JS. African religion and philosophy. London: Heineman Educational Books; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman RE. Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance. In: Huizinga C, editor. Corporate governance: a definitive exploration of the issues. Los Angeles: UCLA Extension Press; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fawcett SB, PaineAndrews A, Francisco VT, Schultz JA, Richter KP, Lewis RK, et al. Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development. Am J Community Psychol. 1995;23(5):677–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. WHO. WHO Community engagement framework for quality, people-centered and resilient health services. Geneva, Switzerland. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rimsza ME, Schackner RA, Bowen KA, Marshall W. Can child deaths be prevented? The Arizona child fatality review program experience. Pediatrics. 2002;110(1 Pt 1):e11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones L, Wells K. Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research. JAMA. 2007;297(4):407–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pratt B, Vries J. Community engagement in global health research that advances health equity. Bioethics. 2018;32(7):454–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12465.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. National Collaborating Centre for Community Engagement. Community engagement for health: a preliminary review of training and development needs and existing provision for public sector organisations and their workers. London: Health Development Agency; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Westfall JM, Fagnan LJ, Handley M, Salsberg J, McGinnis P, Zittleman LK, et al. Practice-based research is community engagement. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):423–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Commission on Community-Engaged Scholarship in the Health Professions. Linking scholarship and communities: the report of the commission on community-engaged scholarship in the health professions. Seattle: Community-Campus Partnerships for Health; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Melby MK, Loh LC, Evert J, Prater C, Lin H, Khan OA. Beyond medical “missions” to impact-driven short-term experiences in Global Health (STEGHs): ethical principles to optimize community benefit and learner experience. Acad Med. 2016;91(5):633–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marullo S, Edwards B. From charity to justice. Am Behav Sci. 2000;43(5):895–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640021955540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Butin D. Dreaming of justice: critical service-learning and the need to wake up. Theory Pract. 2015;54(1):5–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.977646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shackford-Bradley J. Human rights in everyday life: partnering human rights and service-learning/engaged scholarship in local communities. Partnerships: J Service-Learn Civic Engage. 2013;4(2):137–63.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bowen F, Newenham-Kahindi A, Herremans I. When suits meet roots: The antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy. J Business Ethics. 2010;95(2):297–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0360-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Centers for Disease Control. Principles of community engagement. 2nd ed. Atlanta: CDC/ATSDR Committee on Community Engagement; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reynolds L, Sariola S. The ethics and politics of community engagement in global health research. Crit Public Health. 2018;28(3):257–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1449598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown RE, Reed CS, Bates LV, et al. The transformative engagement process: foundations and supports for university-community partnerships. J Higher Educ Outreach Engage. 2006;11(1):9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stirling L, Wilson-Prangley A, Hamilton G, et al. Antecedents to transformational community engagement in South Africa. S Afr J Econ Manag Sci. 2016;19:514–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shor R, Cattaneo L, Calton J. Pathways of transformational service learning: exploring the relationships between context, disorienting dilemmas, and student response. J Transform Educ. 2017;15(2):156–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344616689044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Austin M, Rust D. Developing an experiential learning program: milestones and challenges. Int J Teach Learn Higher Educ. 2015;27(1):143–53.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zerhouni E. The NIH roadmap. Science. 2003;302(5642):63–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fagnan LJ, Davis M, Deyo RA, Werner JJ, Stange KC. Linking practice-based research networks and clinical and translational science awards: new opportunities for community engagement by academic health centers. Acad Med. 2010;85(3):476–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181cd2ed3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Blachman-Demner DR, Wiley TRA, Chambers DA. Fostering integrated approaches to dissemination and implementation and community engaged research. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(3):543–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0527-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmittdiel JA, Grumbach K, Selby JV. System-based participatory research in health care: an approach for sustainable translational research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(3):256–9. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenthal MS, Barash J, Blackstock O, et al. Building community capacity: sustaining the effects of multiple, two-year community-based participatory research projects. Prog Commun Health Partnerships: Res Educ Action. 2014;8(3):365–74. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2014.0049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sobrero P, Jayaratne K. Scholarship perceptions of academic department heads: implications for promoting faculty community engagement scholarship. J Higher Educ Outreach Engage. 2014;18(1):123–51.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Peterson D, Perry J, Dostilio L, et al. Community-engaged faculty: a must for preparing impactful Ed.D. graduates. Metropolitan Universities. 2016;27(2):59–73. https://doi.org/10.18060/21127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Reciprocity TA. Scholarly connections: faculty perspectives about the role of community-engaged work in their career vitality. J Higher Educ Outreach Engage. 2018;22(3):135–59.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Graham PW, Kim MM, Clinton-Sherrod AM, Yaros A, Richmond AN, Jackson M, et al. What is the role of culture, diversity, and community engagement in transdisciplinary translational science? Transl Behav Med. 2016;6(1):115–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0368-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Beaulieu M, Breton M, Brousselle A. Conceptualizing 20 years of engaged scholarship: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193201.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Douglas S. Advancing the scholarship of engagement: an institutional perspective. S Afr Rev Sociol. 2012;43(2):27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McNall M, Barnes-Najor J, Brown R, et al. Systemic engagement: universities as partners in systemic approaches to community change. J Higher Educ Outreach Engage. 2015;19(1):1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fitzgerald H, Simon L. The world grant ideal and engagement scholarship. J High Educ Outreach Engage. 2012;16(3):33.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Saltmarsh J, Wooding J. Rewarding community-engaged scholarship: a state university system approach. Metropolitan Universities. 2016;27(2):74–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Spataro SE, Bloch J. “Can you repeat that?” Teaching active listening in management education. J Manag Educ. 2018;42(2):168–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562917748696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Weger H. Instructor active empathic listening and classroom incivility. Int J Listen. 2018;32(1):49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2017.1289091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Weger H, Castle Bell G, Minei EM, et al. The relative effectiveness of active listening in initial interactions. Int J Listen. 2014;28(1):13–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2013.813234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Foronda C, Diana-Lyn Baptiste D, Maren M. Reinholdt M, et al. Cultural humility: a concept analysis. 2016; 3:210–217.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tervalon M, Murray-Garcia J. Cultural humility versus cultural competence: a critical distinction in defining physician training outcomes in multicultural education. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1998;9(2):117–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Yeager KA, Bauer-Wu S. Cultural humility: essential foundation for clinical researchers. Appl Nurs Res: ANR. 2013;26(4):251–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2013.06.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Fisher-Borne M, Cain JM, Martin SL. From mastery to accountability: cultural humility as an alternative to cultural competence. Soc Work Educ. 2015;34(2):165–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2014.977244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bromley E, Mikesell L, Jones F, Khodyakov D. From subject to participant: ethics and the evolving role of community in health research. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(5):900–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Visscher W, Feder M, Burns A, Brady TM, Bray RM. The impact of smoking and other substance use by urban women on the birthweight of their infants. Subst Use Misuse. 2003;38(8):1063–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Stellefson M, Paige SR, Alber JM, et al. Proposing ethical practice standards for community-engaged research in health education. Am J Health Educ. 2015;46(2):61–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2014.997942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Weijer C. Protecting communities in research: philosophical and pragmatic challenges. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1999;8(4):501–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Morello-Frosch R, Brown P, Brody JG. Democratizing ethical oversight of research through CBPR. In: Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel J, et al., editors. Community-based participatory research for health: advancing social and health equity. 3rd ed. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass; 2018. p. 215–25.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Brody BA. The ethics of biomedical research: an international perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wood L. The ethical implications of community-based research: a call to rethink current review board requirements. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1609406917748276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917748276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Dempsey SE. Critiquing community engagement. Manag Commun Q. 2010;24(3):359–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ramsbottom A, O’Brien E, Ciotti L, Takacs J. Enablers and barriers to community engagement in public health emergency preparedness: a literature review. J Community Health. 2018 Apr;43(2):412–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-017-0415-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel M. Ngui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ngui, E.M. (2020). How to Engage Communities in Research. In: Roberts, L. (eds) Roberts Academic Medicine Handbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31957-1_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31957-1_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31956-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31957-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics