Skip to main content

Urban Responses to Religious Pluralization in France

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religious Diversity and Interreligious Dialogue
  • 556 Accesses

Abstract

Religious pluralization has transformed the religious configuration of European cities. Such changes have raised challenges for public authorities, also at the municipal level. This chapter presents evidence on the institutional responses of French cities to religious pluralization. Drawing on material from qualitative fieldwork conducted in three French cities, I show the variety of municipal measures and instruments implemented to govern issues of religious diversity. I will argue that, contrary to the widespread vision that France follows the Republican creed of strict separation between church and state and the restriction of expressions of religiosity in the public sphere in a unitary manner, there are a number of policies at the urban level that question this monolithic vision.

This research was funded by the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    My own translation from the original in French: “le principe de laïcité dont nous avons hérité doit nécessairement être actualisé pour prendre en compte le nouveau visage de notre société, de nouvelles situations particulières”.

  2. 2.

    My own translation from the original in French: “Lalaïcité, c’est enfin la garantie de la fraternité. Elle n’est pas une négation du fait religieux ou de la spiritualité. La laïcité n’est ni une indifférence, ni une intolérance. Elle est au contraire une exigence de dialogue, d’apaisement, de coexistence harmonieuse”.

  3. 3.

    My own translation from the original in French: liberté, neutralité, vivre-ensemble, tolérance, humanité, loi, fraternité, liberté de conscience, pluralisme, dialogue, enjeu, doctrine, neutralité absolue de l’état, coexistence.

  4. 4.

    https://marikfetouh.fr/2016/06/27/repas-de-rupture-du-jeune-organise-par-la-fmg/

  5. 5.

    https://marikfetouh.fr/2017/10/31/vive-la-fraternite-a-bordeaux/

References

  • Amiraux, V., & Koussens, D. (2013). From law to narratives unveiling. Contemporary French secularism. RECODE Working Paper Series, 19, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association des Maires de France. (2015). Laïcité. Le vade-mecum de l’AMF. http://www.amf.asso.fr/upload/fichiers/documents/AMF_14082_VADE_MECUM.pdf

  • Association Petites Villes de France. (2015). Laïcité et Vivre-ensemble dans les petites villes: Un diagnostic. http://www.apvf.asso.fr/files/publications/LB-DEFINITIF-Laicite-et-Vivre-ensemble-dans-les-petites-villes.pdf

  • Astor, A. (2009). “Mezquita no!”: The origins of mosque oppositions in Spain. GRITIM Working Paper Series, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barras, A. (2013). Sacred Laïcité and the politics of religious resurgence in France: Whither religious pluralism? Mediterranean Politics, 18(2), 276–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baubérot, J. (2015). Les sept laïcités françaises: le modèle français de laïcité n’existe pas. Paris: Les Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bertossi, C. (2012). French republicanism and the problem of normative density. Comparative European Politics, 10(3), 248–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, J. (2007). A view from France on the internal complexity of national models. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(6), 1003–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brighenti, A. (2007). Visibility: A category for the social sciences. Current Sociology, 55(3), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (2013). Categories of analysis and categories of practice: A note on the study of Muslims in European countries of immigration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesari, J. (2005). Mosque conflicts in European cities: Introduction. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(6), 1015–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Galembert, C. (2003). La gestion publique de l’islam en France et en Allemagne. Revue internationale et stratégique, (52), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Galembert, C. (2006). La construction de l’islam comme ressource d’autorité publique du pouvoir local: La parabole de Mantes-la-Jolie. In B. Jouve & A. G. Gagnon (Eds.), Les métropoles au défi de la diversité culturelle (pp. 69–94). Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, E., & Nagel, A. K. (2017). Local interfaith networks in urban integration politics: Religious communities between innovation and cooptation. In V. Hegner & P. J. Margry (Eds.), Spiritualizing the city: Agency and resilience of the urban and urbanesque habitat (pp. 27–45). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. (2015). Understanding the (re)definition of nationhood in French cities: A case of multiple states and multiple republics. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 15(2), 336–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, L. (2009). Une gestion publique de l’islam entre rupture et rhétorique. L’Homme et La Société, 4, 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourot, A.-C. (2015). Instruments d’action publique et régulation municipale de l’islam. Gouvernement et Action Publique, 3, 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (2015). Political secularism, religion, and the state: A time series analysis of worldwide data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griera, M. (2012). Public policies, interfaith associations and religious minorities: A new policy paradigm? Evidence from the case of Barcelona. Social Compass, 59(4), 570–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, R. (2014). The changing religious space of large Western European cities. Prace Geograficzne, 137, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuppinger, P. (2014). Mosques and minarets: Conflict, participation, and visibility in German cities. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(3), 793–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuru, A. T. (2007). Passive and assertive secularism: Historical conditions, ideological struggles, and state policies toward religion. World Politics, 59(4), 568–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lascoumes, P., & Le Gales, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments—From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen, T. (2013). Multilevel and pluricentric network governance of religion. In T. Martikainen & F. Gauthier (Eds.), Religion in the neoliberal age (pp. 129–142). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Ariño, J. (2019). Governing Islam in French cities: defining ‘acceptable’ public religiosity through municipal consultative bodies. Religion, State and Society, 47(4–5), 423–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obadia, L. (2015). Social and spatial visibility of religion in question: The case of Pluricultural and multiconfessional France. In S. D. Brunn (Ed.), The changing world religion map. Sacred places, identities, practices and politics (pp. 1599–1614). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Observatoire de la laïcité. (2015). Laïcité et collectivités territoriales.http://www.gouvernement.fr/sites/default/files/contenu/piece-jointe/2015/10/charte_laicite_et_collectivites_locales-octobre2015-v3.pdf

  • Roy, O. (2013). Secularism and Islam: The theological predicament. The International Spectator, 48(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarcinelli, U. (2008). Symbolic politics: The international encyclopedia of communication. Blackwell Reference Online. http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405131995_chunk_g978140513199524_ss132-1

  • Scot, J.P. (2007). Liberté-égalité-laïcité. Genèse, caractères et enjeux de la loi de 1905. Cahiers d’histoire. Revue d’histoire critique, (100), 161–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemiatycki, M. (2005). Contesting sacred urban space: The case of the Eruv. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 6(2), 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soper, J. C., & Fetzer, J. S. (2007). Religious institutions, church–state history and Muslim mobilisation in Britain, France and Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(6), 933–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, B. A. (1983). Congress and capital punishment: An exercise in symbolic politics. Law & Policy, 5(2), 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrekens, C. (2012). Concertation et négociation à l’échelle politique locale. Le cas de la gestion locale de l’islam à Bruxelles. Participations, 1, 126–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S. (2005). Symbolic spaces of difference: Contesting the eruv in Barnet, London and Tenafly, New Jersey. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23(4), 597–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisse, W. (2016). Religious pluralization and secularization in continental Europe, with focus on France and Germany. Society, 53(1), 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, K., & Connelly, N. (1981). Policy and practice in the multi-racial city. London: Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Martínez-Ariño .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martínez-Ariño, J. (2020). Urban Responses to Religious Pluralization in France. In: Körs, A., Weisse, W., Willaime, JP. (eds) Religious Diversity and Interreligious Dialogue. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31856-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31856-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31855-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31856-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics